Groups urge Thailand to establish Surrogacy laws

[JURIST] Surrogacy campaigners on Saturday urged for the Thailand government [official website] to provide clearer regulations to address domestic and international surrogacy issues. Currently, Thailand does not have any established laws [advocacy website] which speak to issues regarding surrogacy. The movement for surrogacy laws in Thailand has became an international issue due to a recent incident where an Australian couple paid a Thai women to carry their child. When the surrogate mother bore twins, the male child was rejected by the adoptive parents [BBC report] due to complications such as a congenital heart disease, a lung infection, and down syndrome. The surrogate mother is currently taking care of the refused twin and is currently raising funds [campaign website] to support the child.

Courts around the world continue to grapple with legal issues surrounding surrogacy. In 2012 a judge for Australia's Queensland District Court defined the term "conception" [JURIST report] as the act of getting pregnant. The definition was crucial because the Queensland Surrogacy Act of 2010 [text, PDF] requires that surrogacy arrangements be signed "before the child is conceived." In the US the New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, issued two rulings [JURIST report] expanding the rights of nonbiological gay and lesbian parents. In one case the court ruled 7-0 that a lesbian can assert parental rights over the biological child of her partner, reversing a lower court decision [JURIST report]. In a separate case the court ruled [NYTimes Blog] 4-3 that a lesbian could seek child support from her former partner.

 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.