Supreme Court rules for steel company in labor case

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Monday in Sandifer v. US Steel Corp. [SCOTUS Blog backgrounder] that employees are not entitled to compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) [text, PDF] for time spent changing in and out of protective gear. The FLSA governs minimum wages and maximum hours for certain employees and specifically excludes the time it takes to change clothes from hours worked, unless otherwise specified in a collective bargaining agreement. A group of current and former employees at the US Steel plant in Gary, Indiana sought backpay for time spent donning and doffing protective gear, including commonly used flame-retardant gear, despite a provision in the companies collective-bargaining agreement which states that this time is noncompensable. The employee's argued [brief, PDF] that the word "clothes" as used in the FLSA does not include the protective gear, which is designed to guard against workplace hazards. Writing for a unanimous court, Justice Antonin Scalia rejected that argument and held that the time spent donning and doffing protective gear is not subject to compensation under the FLSA because it was not sufficiently different from "changing clothes" [Reuters report].

The court heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] on the case in November. The court granted the petition for certiorari [text, PDF] after the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit [official website] ruled [opinion] in favor of US Steel Corp.

 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.