Congress policy analysts question legal justification of NSA surveillance News
Congress policy analysts question legal justification of NSA surveillance

[JURIST] The Congressional Research Service [welcome page, archives], the non-partisan public policy research arm of the US Congress, reported [text, PDF] Friday that although the legality of the NSA warrantless surveillance program [JURIST archive] could not be determined due to the need for classified materials, the legal justification [JURIST document] for the program "does not seem to be as well-grounded" as the Bush administration has asserted. The report also concluded that a court would likely find that Congress did not intend to legislatively authorize the surveillance operations under its 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force. White House spokesmen maintain that the program was legally conducted, necessary to the war on terror, and protective of civil liberties. The New York Times has more.

THIS DAY @ LAW

President Harding signed "anti-beer bill"

On November 23, 1921, President Warren G. Harding signed the Willis-Campbell Act, popularly termed the "anti-beer bill," prohibiting doctors from prescribing beer or liquor for medicinal purposes.

Convention on Cybercrimes opens for signature

On November 23, 2001, the Convention on Cybercrime was opened for signature in Budapest, Hungary, before entering into force on July 1, 2004. The Convention seeks to coordinate the Internet laws of signatory states and promote international enforcement of cybercrime laws. Learn more about the Convention on Cybercrime from the Council of Europe.