The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit declined Tuesday to overturn a lower court’s injunction that blocked President Donald Trump’s executive order abrogating birthright citizenship. The rejection stated that the federal government had not made a “strong showing that they are likely to succeed on the merits,” as required by law.
Circuit Judge Danielle Forrest, a Trump appointee, concurred with the opinion. She found the government’s sole basis for emergency relief was that the lower court had “stymied implementation of an Executive Branch policy,” and that this argument alone was insufficient for emergencies. Neither opinion addressed the merits of the executive order or interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment’s citizenship clause.
This was the first time an appellate court has weighed in on Trump’s birthright citizenship order. Other appeals are underway as three other federal judges in Maryland, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire have similarly blocked the order. Judge John Coughenour, who ruled against Trump prior to this appeal, found there was a strong likelihood that the executive order violates the 14th Amendment and immigration laws. But now following the appellate court’s decision, the Trump administration has their first chance of being heard on this issue before the Supreme Court.
The US Supreme Court has clear precedent on the issue of birthright citizenship which is more than 125 years old. In 1898, the court ruled in United States v. Wong Kim Ark that the 14th Amendment guaranteed birthright citizenship regardless of the immigration status of the child’s parents. Trump’s executive order seeks to end birthright citizenship for babies born in the US to parents without citizenship or permanent status. Judge Coughenour, in his ruling, claimed the order was “blatantly unconstitutional.”
Longstanding precedent, however, has been overturned by the Supreme Court before, as it was in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization in 2022 (overturning the nearly 50-year abortion rights precedent in Roe v. Wade) and Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo in 2024 (overturning the 40-year old Chevron deference to executive agencies).