Iran court’s amputation sentence raises concerns for human dignity and rights News
mostafa_meraji / Pixabay
Iran court’s amputation sentence raises concerns for human dignity and rights

A Tehran court sentenced two individuals to finger amputation as punishment for a theft that occurred in June 2022, when 13 individuals, allegedy including the two principal defendants, arranged a robbery at the National Bank of Iran. The group proceeded to flee the nation following the theft, however, Turkish officials ultimately apprehended them and sent them back to Iran.

The sentence, in accordance with Iran’s Islamic Penal Code, is part of a broader framework of corporal punishment that has been used to address crimes such as theft. While amputation is legally sanctioned in Iran, this practice contradicts various international legal standards, especially human rights obligations under treaties that Iran is party to.

Iran is a signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which expressly prohibits inhumane and degrading treatment, including torture. Article 7 of the ICCPR forbids any form of cruel or degrading punishment. The amputation of fingers, as a form of retributive justice, is seen as inconsistent with the principle of human dignity upheld by the ICCPR.

Although Iran is not a party to the United Nations Convention Against Torture, the country are regardless bound by international norms and standards regarding the treatment of prisoners and criminals. Iranian courts continue to impose amputation penalties in defiance of these duties, indicating a significant discrepancy between Iranian domestic legislation and its international commitments.

Amnesty International has been a strong opponent of amputations. The organisation urged Iranian officials to be held responsible for these abuses and denounced the amputation of fingers as “cruel, inhuman, and degrading” in a 2022 report. Amnesty highlights the long-term psychological and physical suffering inflicted upon those who receive this punishment, as well as the duty of the international community to demand that such practices be abolished in Iran.

THIS DAY @ LAW

38 Santee Sioux hanged by US for rebellion

On December 26, 1862, 38 Santee Sioux men were hanged in a mass execution for their roles in a rebellion against US authorities in Minnesota which left hundreds dead and made refugees of some 40,000 white settlers. Government annuities promised under a treaty with the Sioux had failed to arrive on schedule and credit for purchases was not advanced in the meantime, threatening the tribe with starvation. The Santee Sioux Tribe's members were deported first to South Dakota and ultimately to Nebraska, where they remain today. Learn more about the 1862 Minnesota Sioux Rebellion.

Louis XVI put on trial during French Revolution

On December 26, 1792, Romain de Sèze, a defense attorney for deposed King Louis XVI, presented a defense of his client. The former King was on trial before a French Revolutionary court on thirty-three charges, including treason and other crimes against the state. He was convicted on January 15, 1793 executed by guillotine on the following January 21.