North Carolina Supreme Court holds that it had no authority to strike down redistricting maps last year News
DiscoA340, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
North Carolina Supreme Court holds that it had no authority to strike down redistricting maps last year

The North Carolina Supreme Court Friday held that the court had no authority to strike down the state’s election redistricting map last year.

In Harper v. Hall, the majority of the state’s highest court reasoned that the role of the court does not include political disputes that implicate policy issues. Chief Justice Paul Martin Newby explained the decision by the court to strike down the redistricting map exceeded the North Carolina Constitution’s separation of powers between the executive, legislative and judicial branches.

Historically, the majority detailed:

Courts presume that an act of the General Assembly is constitutional, and any challenge alleging that an act of the General Assembly is unconstitutional must identify an express provision of the constitution and demonstrate that the General Assembly violated the provision beyond a reasonable doubt.

Ultimately, the majority found the plaintiffs did not meet the burden to find the General Assembly violated the state constitution with partisan gerrymandering. Most of the justices sided with the defendants, including North Carolina Representative Destin Hall, because they claimed the former make-up of the court in December misinterpreted the state’s constitution and expanded their judicial powers unconstitutionally to decide a solely political case.

Justice Anita Earls wrote the dissenting opinion and stated:

Today, the majority strips the people of this right; it tells North Carolinians that the state constitution and the courts cannot protect their basic human right to self-governance and self-determination. Unchecked partisan gerrymandering allows the controlling party of the General Assembly to draw legislative redistricting plans in a way that dilutes voting power of voters in the disfavored party.

This comes after the Democratic majority for the North Carolina court held the maps violated the state’s constitution because they favored one political party over the other. Last October, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments concerning alleged racial gerrymandering in Alabama’s redistricting maps, with a decision expected by June.

THIS DAY @ LAW

UN Security Council called for Israeli withdrawal from territories occupied in Six Days' War

On November 22, 1967, the UN Security Council called for Israeli withdrawal from territories occupied during the Six Days' War, and for respect of the right of all States in the area to "live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries." Read Resolution 242, which remains a cornerstone of efforts to achieve peace in the Middle East.

President Kennedy assassinated, VP Lyndon Johnson sworn inin

On November 22, 1963, President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas. Later that day, Vice-President Lyndon Johnson was sworn in as the 36th President of the United States. Earl Warren, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, was later tasked with leading a commission to investigate the assassination. President Johnson received the final report of the Warren Commission on September 24, 1964. Read the Warren Commission Report.