US appeals court: employees cannot continue action against OSHA after close of enforcement proceedings News
PublicDomainPictures / Pixabay
US appeals court: employees cannot continue action against OSHA after close of enforcement proceedings

The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Tuesday affirmed a ruling holding that the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSH Act) does not allow an employee to maintain an action against the Secretary of Labor seeking relief for dangerous working conditions after the Department of Labor (DOL) has completed enforcement proceedings.

Judge D. Brooks Smith wrote that the OSH Act does not allow a private right of action to continue once injunctive relief under Section 662 of the OSH Act is no longer available. Accordingly, the private right of action permitted in Section 662(d) of the act is “limited to combating imminent workplace dangers that cannot await the conclusion of OSHA’s enforcement proceedings.”

Three employees of Maid-Rite Specialty Foods, a meat-packing plant located in Dunmore, Pennsylvania, sued the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the DOL and the Secretary of Labor in his official capacity for failing to address alleged insufficient COVID-19 prevention measures at the plant. The employees asserted that Section 662(d) of the OSH Act granted employees the ability to challenge OSHA’s determinations on “imminent dangers” in the workplace, outside the time constraints imposed on injunctive relief. The District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania dismissed the complaint. The appeals court affirmed the district court’s dismissal, holding that Congress intended to provide a “limited mechanism” to address imminent work place dangers that cannot await the conclusion of OSHA’s standard enforcement process.

The employees filed suit on July 22, 2020, after OSHA informed their employer that it would inspect the plant the following day. During the proceedings, OSHA acknowledged that such advanced notice is not its “typical practice.” However, OSHA stated that its need to protect OSHA employees from COVID-19 necessitated such notice. After OSHA’s inspection on July 8, 2020, the agency determined that the conditions at the plant “did not constitute an imminent danger.” In their complaint, the employees argued that the lack of surprise “allowed Maid-Rite to direct its employees to change their conduct and created the appearance that the Plant was closer in line with the OSHA and CDC COVID-19 mitigation guidance.”

THIS DAY @ LAW

Justice Department brings anit-trust action against AT&T

On November 20, 1974, the Department of Justice filed its final anti-trust suit against AT&T. United States v. AT&T was ultimately settled out of court with an agreement that the corporation would break up its monopoly on phone service throughout the country.

Nuremberg war crimes trials began

On November 20, 1945, the war crimes trials of Nazi World War II leaders began in the German city of Nuremberg. Review the Nuremberg Tribunal's Charter and the verdicts and sentences handed down on major war figures.

Winston Churchill born

On November 20, 1874, Sir Winston Churchill was born in Woodstock, England. He would go on to lead the United Kingdom as Prime Minister through World War II. Toward the end of the war, Churchill worked with US President Franklin D. Roosevelt to craft the treaties and accords that have defined the world since WWII. A 2002 poll by the BBC declared Churchill the Greatest Briton of all time.

New Jersey ratifies Bill of Rights

New Jersey ratified the Bill of Rights, a set of 10 fundamental amendments to the US Constitution, on November 20, 1789, becoming the first state to do so. The state also ratified an amendment on federal representation which ultimately failed. Additionally, New Jersey rejected an amendment on congressional salaries, which would eventually become the 27th Amendment more than 200 years later. Read the articles ratified by New Jersey.