Federal appeals court blocks bid to reduce limits on detention for accompanied minors in immigration custody News
pixel2013 / Pixabay
Federal appeals court blocks bid to reduce limits on detention for accompanied minors in immigration custody

The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Tuesday blocked a set of regulations from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that were set to significantly reduce the limits on detention for minors taken into custody with a family member or guardian (“accompanied minors”).

In coming to the decision, the court held to the standards set forth by the Flores Settlement Agreement (FSA), a consent decree with protections for minors in immigration custody that the US government agreed to comply with in 1997. The FSA “established nationwide standards for the detention, release, and treatment of minors by US immigration authorities,” creating a “presumption in favor of releasing minors and requires placement of those not released in licensed, non-secure facilities that meet certain standards.” In 2015, a federal judge decided the protections applied to both unaccompanied and accompanied minors.

By the FSA’s own terms, it terminates after the government’s publication of final regulations implementing it. DHS’s final regulations issued in 2019 were set to implement, and thus terminate, the FSA. The regulations sought to change the law surrounding accompanied minors.

For example, one shift since the FSA entered into force in 1997 has been the 2015 judicial interpretation of the agreement as applying to accompanied minors, i.e., juveniles encountered with their parents or legal guardians. DHS strongly disagrees with that interpretation and disagrees that the FSA provisions were suited to handling the challenging circumstances that are presented—in exponentially more cases than in 1997—when aliens are apprehended in family units.

Ultimately, the court found that the new regulations relating to accompanied minors were inconsistent with the FSA. It found that the government went beyond the FSA in attempting to detain families together, rather than permitting the placement of parents and children together.

The government’s intent is not to place families together in an open setting, but to “detain” them together for “enforcement” purposes. We therefore conclude that the new regulations regarding licensed facilities are inconsistent with the Agreement.

The court affirmed the district court’s order enjoining the final regulations and approved its conclusion that the FSA was not terminated by the adoption of the regulations.

THIS DAY @ LAW

Laws of Burgos put into effect

The Spanish Crown put the Laws of Burgos into effect on December 27, 1512. These laws governed the relationship of Spanish settlers with the indigenous peoples of the Caribbean. The laws established the encomienda system of labor, promoted conversion to Catholicism, and safeguarded the indigenous peoples from physical abuse.  However, historians argue that the laws were ineffective at protecting the rights of the indigenous population. Learn more from the Library of Congress.

Prohibitionist Carrie Nation carried out her first public bar smashing

On December 27, 1900, militant Prohibitionist Carrie Nation carried out her first public smashing of a bar, at the Carey Hotel in Wichita, Kansas. Nation argued that destroying bars was an acceptable means of battling the liquor trade since the Kansas Constitution prohibited alcohol. Learn more about Carrie Nation.

World Bank created

On December 27, 1944, the World Bank was created during the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, USA. Learn more about the history of the World Bank.