Supreme Court to rule on appointment of patent judges News
272447 / Pixabay
Supreme Court to rule on appointment of patent judges

The Supreme Court granted certiorari on Tuesday in United States v. Arthrex Inc and two other consolidated cases to address the appointment of administrative patent judges.

The question before the court is whether administrative patent judges are considered “principal officers” under the US Constitution’s Appointment Clause or are instead considered “inferior officers.” If administrative patent judges are considered “principal officers,” then they must receive Senate confirmation. However, if they are “inferior officers,” the department head can appoint them.

Currently, the Patent Act of 1952 authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to appoint administrative patent judges. The respondent challenged a decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board on the grounds that the administrative patent judges who rendered a decision were unconstitutionally appointed without Senate confirmation. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit agreed, and the US appealed to the Supreme Court.

The court has not scheduled a date for oral argument yet. Each side will have 30 minutes to argue.

THIS DAY @ LAW

19th Amendment adopted

On August 26, 1920, the Nineteenth Amendment to the US Constitution was adopted, granting women full suffrage. The Amendment states that "[t]he right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation." Learn more about the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment from the National Archives.

Declaration of the Rights of Man adopted

On August 26, 1789, the Declaration of the Rights of Man was adopted by the French National Assembly. Click here to read the text of the Declaration and learn more about its formulation.