Hong Kong appeals court partially upholds face mask ban News
vperemencom / Pixabay
Hong Kong appeals court partially upholds face mask ban

The Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal on Thursday partially upheld the special administrative region’s recent ban on face masks during public gatherings.

The ruling notes that “the expert evidence shows [that] masks function as a facilitator of anonymity […] for rioters and those who resort to violence. […] The PFCR [Prohibition on Face Covering Regulation] makes it an offence for anyone without reasonable excuse wearing a mask that will prevent identification at public assemblies or processions.”

The ruling cited 2013’s HKSAR v. Chow Nok Hang (2013), which upheld Hong Kong’s ability to impose limits on the right of assembly as the special administrative region’s government sees fit. This includes limitations on protester attire, including the face masks that protesters have been wearing during the past 10 months’ demonstrations.

In November a Hong Kong High Court ruled a ban on face masks to be unconstitutional, but the ban continued in conjunction with protests that began in June 2019 to protest a controversial extradition bill that would have limited the democratic status of the special administrative region. Hong Kong’s Secretary of Security withdrew the bill, but protests have continued.

While Thursday’s decision upholds a ban on face masks during protests, it recognizes “that many other protesters participating in public assemblies and processions who are not involved in violence are also wearing masks and dressed in black outfits.” In a win for pro-democracy activists, this decision reverses police autonomy to forcefully remove protester masks. However, the court emphasizes a protest’s potential to rapidly turn violent and notes that banning face masks is constitutional in a time of “public danger.”

As the pandemic continues, the court remains open, but all entrants are required to wear a mask and submit to a temperature check upon reaching court premises. There are currently 974 cases of COVID-19 in the special administrative region, with four deaths attributed to the disease.

For more on COVID-19, see our special coverage.

THIS DAY @ LAW

38 Santee Sioux hanged by US for rebellion

On December 26, 1862, 38 Santee Sioux men were hanged in a mass execution for their roles in a rebellion against US authorities in Minnesota which left hundreds dead and made refugees of some 40,000 white settlers. Government annuities promised under a treaty with the Sioux had failed to arrive on schedule and credit for purchases was not advanced in the meantime, threatening the tribe with starvation. The Santee Sioux Tribe's members were deported first to South Dakota and ultimately to Nebraska, where they remain today. Learn more about the 1862 Minnesota Sioux Rebellion.

Louis XVI put on trial during French Revolution

On December 26, 1792, Romain de Sèze, a defense attorney for deposed King Louis XVI, presented a defense of his client. The former King was on trial before a French Revolutionary court on thirty-three charges, including treason and other crimes against the state. He was convicted on January 15, 1793 executed by guillotine on the following January 21.