Federal judge blocks Seattle ride sharing union law News
Federal judge blocks Seattle ride sharing union law

The US District Court for the Western District of Washington [official website] has issued a preliminary injunction [text, PDF] to block Seattle’s first-in-the-nation law that will allow drivers for taxis, Lyft and Uber [official websites] to unionize. The law, passed in 2015, allows drivers who are considered independent contractors to unionize and collectively bargain for benefits such as healthcare. The law was challenged by two separate suits, one brought by a small group of drivers from each company, the other by the US Chamber of Commerce [official website]. The Chamber of Commerce asserts [Seattle Times report] that under federal law, the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), contractors are not permitted to unionize. Excluding from unionization under the NLRA are public-sector workers, agriculture workers, domestic workers, supervisors and independent contractors. The first three are permitted to unionize under various state laws. City attorneys argue that independent contractors are more akin to the first three than supervisors and the city has the authority to permit them to unionize. The Chamber contends that while drivers have been permitted to set uniform rates to deter under-charing, they have never been able to collectively bargain. Should the city law be upheld, the business models for Lyft and Uber would “likely be disrupted in fundamental and irreparable ways.” The presiding judge stressed that the “Order should not be read as a harbinger of what the ultimate decision in this case will be” when all motions have been fully considered.

With the rapid growth of companies like Lyft and Uber, ride-sharing services have been among the most controversial business models [JURIST backgrounder] in recent history. In March a judge for the US District Court for the Northern District of California [official website] approved a $27 million settlement [JURIST report] in a class action lawsuit between Lyft and its drivers. The suit challenged Lyft’s characterization of the drivers as independent contractors. In December the European wing of Uber was indicted [JURIST report] in Denmark on charges of assisting drivers in their violation of taxi laws, although Copenhagen prosecutor Vibeke Thorkil-Jensen stated that this is just a test case seeking judicial assessment of Uber’s involvement in the illegal acts of two of its drivers. Last April Uber settled a lawsuit [JURIST report] brought by 385,000 drivers in California and Massachusetts regarding their status as independent contractors. In several states, ride-sharing companies have met significant legal opposition, frequently led by competitors such as the taxi industry. Other unresolved questions [JURIST backgrounder] surrounding this new business model continue to prompt debate among lawmakers.

THIS DAY @ LAW

Pope Urban II sparks First Crusade

Pope Urban II threw his support behind what would become the First Crusade on November 27, 1095 during the Council of Clairmont. The Pope urged the council's participants to render aid to the Byzantine Empire, which was being attacked by the Seljuks. Pope Urban called for a wide coalition of rich and poor to combat the threat, which eventually resulted in the conquest of much of the Muslim-controlled Levant by the Crusaders and the establishment of the Crusader States. Read Pope Urban's address.  

Catholic Code of Canon Law revised

On November 27, 1983, the revised Code of Canon Law of the Roman Catholic Church went into effect. Learn more about the history of Canon Law from Professor Kenneth Pennington of the Catholic University of America's Columbus School of Law.

Alfred Nobel creates Nobel Prize in his will

On November 27, 1895, Alfred Nobel signed his will, creating the Nobel Prize. Learn more about the history of the Nobel Prize and the Nobel Commission.