Federal appeals court to rehear patent rules challenge News
Federal appeals court to rehear patent rules challenge

[JURIST] A federal appeals court on Monday ordered [text, PDF] an en banc rehearing of a patent case that challenges new US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) [official website] rules [text, PDF]. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit [official website] will reexamine a previous ruling [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] that upheld three of the rules but rejected a fourth after all four were struck down [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] by a district court. The rules upheld would limit the number of times that someone can request a re-examination of a patent and require applicants with several claims to submit additional materials among other provisions aimed to address the "large and growing backlog of unexamined patent applications." The three-judge panel for the court rejected one rule [37 CFR § 1.78(d)(1)(i) text] that requires a person pursuing more than two continuation applications to file a petition showing that the added information could not have been provided previously, removing all references to the prior application if the requisite showing is not made. The panel ruled that this fourth rule was inconsistent with 35 USC § 120 [text], which entitles patent applicants to use the filing date of the previously-filed application. The original action was brought by plaintiffs Smithkline Beecham Corporation, doing business as GlaxoSmithKline [corporate website], and Dr. Triantafyllos Tafas [TradeVibes profile] against the PTO and the office's former director Jon Dudas [professional profile].

In addition to rules aimed at slowing down the influx of applications, the scope of patentable subject matter may affect the number of patents being filed in the future. In June, the US Supreme Court [official website] granted certiorari [JURIST report] in the controversial case of Bilski v. Doll [docket; cert. petition, PDF] to review the scope of patentable subject matter. In Bilski, the Court will rule on the rejection of a business method patent that sought to protect a method of hedging risks in commodities trading. The Federal Circuit narrowly defined [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] the "machine-or-transformation" test to be used in determining business method patent eligibility.

THIS DAY @ LAW

UN General Assembly approves Palestine partition plan

The UN General Assembly approved UN Resolution Resolution 181 (II) on November 29, 1947, recommending that the British Mandate for Palestine be split into a Jewish state, an Arab state, and an international zone for Jerusalem. The vote in the assembly was 33 for to 13 against, with 10 abstentions. The resolution sparked a war between Palestinian Arabs and Jews in 1947 and a wider war after Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and Lebanon invaded the new State of Israel in 1948. Read Resolution 181 (II).

UN divided Palestine between Arabs and Jews

On November 29, 1947, the UN General Assembly voted to partition Palestine into Jewish and Arab territories, leading to the establishment of a Jewish state the following year. Read UN General Assembly Resolution 181.

Defense Secretary Robert McNamara resigns during Vietnam Conflict

On November 29, 1967, Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara announced that he was resigning from his office to accept an appointment as head of the World Bank. The announcement came as the Vietnam Conflict was becoming increasingly unpopular in the United States and abroad.