CT v. Spellings, State of Connecticut, August 22, 2005 [complaint alleging that the federal No Child Left Behind Act is illegal because it requires states to provide programs and expensive testing without furnishing adequate funding and asks that the judge declare that states and local school districts are not required to spend their funds to comply with NCLB mandates]. Read the full text of the complaint here [PDF]. Reported in JURIST's Paper Chase here.
News