US must not hand over Ramadan for Iraqi execution Commentary
US must not hand over Ramadan for Iraqi execution
Edited by:

Giovanni Di Stefano [defense lawyer for Taha Ramadan; Studio Legale Internazionale, Rome]: "The decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit in the recent case of Shawqi Omar confirms the submissions we made in the cases of Saddam Hussein, Barzan Al Tikriti and Awwad Al Bandar; namely that the US government cannot use the question of jurisdiction to preclude our clients being protected by US law. In Omar the judges rejected the US contention that, although it has custody of Omar, US court jurisdiction is precluded because the forces are part of a multinational effort. This was the argument that the US Government successfully made in the case of Saddam Hussein on 29th December 2006. I was appalled by the conduct of the US, which handed over Saddam Hussein within 40 minutes of the DC Court's decision and allowed the Iraqi Government to execute him BEFORE I had an opportunity to appeal. The Omar case makes evident that had Saddam not been handed over until an appeal was made (as in the case of Omar) that appeal would have succeeded. It follows that the rights of any citizen before a US Court is no less than that of a US citizen. There cannot be a system of a fair trial and fair rights for US citizens, and less for others. Omar was a naturalized US citizen still holding Jordanian citizenship.

In the case of Taha Ramadan, I will now go to [US federal court] to preclude the US Government in handing him over for execution until his civil suit in the US is resolved. In the event the US hands him over prior to such, it may well be the case that those responsible for the decision will answer to the legal consequences in both the civil and criminal courts. It is time that the US ceased playing the part of Pontius Pilate in these matters and exhibited a respect for law and order. I am personally grateful to the US DC Circuit Court for having the intellectual courage to reach the correct decision in Omar. It is too late for Saddam Hussein, Barzan Al Tikriti and Awwad Al Bandar but may not be too late for others."

Opinions expressed in JURIST Commentary are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of JURIST's editors, staff, donors or the University of Pittsburgh.
THIS DAY @ LAW

US Supreme Court ruled Indians not US citizens

On November 3, 1884, the US Supreme Court ruled in Elk v. Wilkins that John Elk, an American Indian who had tried to vote in a federal election in Omaha, Nebraska, was not a US citizen entitled to the protection of the 14th and 15th Amendments of the US Constitution. Native Americans became eligible for citizenship in 1887 under the Dawes Act, but only in 1924, under the Indian Citizenship Act, were all Native Americans born in the US made citizens.

Last public execution at Tyburn Gallows in London

On November 3, 1783, the last public execution took place at Tyburn Gallows in London, when John Austin was hanged for highway robbery. From the hanging of William Fitz Osburn in 1196 until Austin's execution, Tyburn served as London's primary location for public executions.

Learn more about the trial of John Austin.