JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh

Today in legal history...

Saturday, October 27, 2012

Federal judge ruled on meaning of 'enemy combatant'
Kimberly Bennett at 12:00 AM ET

On October 27, 2008, Judge Richard Leon of the US District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that an "enemy combatant" must have directly supported hostilities against the US or its allies. Leon stated that the definition should comport with the President's constitutional war powers and the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force [PDF]. He adopted the definition provided in a 2004 Order Establishing Combatant Status Review Tribunal [PDF] for use in several habeas corpus petitions filed by Guantanamo detainees, which stated that:

an "enemy combatant" shall mean an individual who was part of or supporting Taliban or al Qaeda forces, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. This includes any person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported hostilities in aid of enemy armed forces.

Learn more about Guantanamo Bay detainess from the JURIST news archive, and read an overview of Guantanamo Bay in Features.

Link post | IM post | go to JURIST | © JURIST, 2012


 Defense Secretary Robert McNamara resigns during Vietnam Conflict
November 29, 2015

 UN divided Palestine between Arabs and Jews
November 29, 2015

 click for more...


Add This Day at Law to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL


Subscribe to This Day at Law alerts via R|mail. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.
MyBlogAlerts also e-mails alerts of new This Day at Law entries. It's free and fast, but ad-based.


This Day at Law welcomes reader comments, tips, URLs, updates and corrections. E-mail us at archives@jurist.org