JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh

THIS DAY AT LAW
Today in legal history...

Wednesday, June 06, 2012

Supreme Court ruled on patent rights to HIV testing process
Katherine Bacher at 12:00 AM ET

On June 6, 2010, the US Supreme Court ruled in Board of Trustees of Stanford University v. Roche Molecular Systems that the titles of inventions developed through federally funded research do not automatically belong to the university where the research was conducted. The dispute concerned a Stanford employee that had developed a method to test for HIV in blood samples. The Court determined that the Bayh-Doyle Act did not override existing patent law regarding an inventor's rights to his or her invention belonging to an inventor. This determination ensured that Stanford could not claim title to inventions developed by employees prior to their employment at the university.



Learn more about patent law from the JURIST news archive.




Link post | IM post | go to JURIST | © JURIST, 2012


LATEST DAYS

 Former Rwanda politician convicted of genocide
September 2, 2014

 AL governor Wallace deployed National Guard to stop integration of Tuskegee High
September 2, 2014

 click for more...

SYNDICATION

Add This Day at Law to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to This Day at Law alerts via R|mail. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.
MyBlogAlerts also e-mails alerts of new This Day at Law entries. It's free and fast, but ad-based.

CONTACT

This Day at Law welcomes reader comments, tips, URLs, updates and corrections. E-mail us at archives@jurist.org