JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh

THIS DAY AT LAW
Today in legal history...

Sunday, May 27, 2012

Australia court ruled Red Cross not required to accept blood from homosexual donors
Meagan McElroy at 12:00 AM ET

On May 27, 2009, an Australian anti-discrimination court ruled that the Red Cross policy of not accepting blood donations from sexually active gay males did not discriminate against that group. Petitioner Michael Cain tried to donate blood in 2004 but was refused after he affirmatively answered an inquiry into whether he "had male-to-male sex" during the past 12 months. The stated policy reason for not accepting petitioner Michael Cain's blood donation was the increased risk of undiagnosed HIV infection in donors who had recently engaged in "male-to-male sex." The same rationale is used in many countries, including the US, to deny blood donations from gay men. The United Kingdom (UK) lifted its lifetime ban on blood donations by men who had engaged in homosexual intercourse in September 2011.

Learn more about legal issues surrounding HIV from the JURIST news archive.




Link post | IM post | go to JURIST | © JURIST, 2012


LATEST DAYS

 Former Rwanda politician convicted of genocide
September 2, 2014

 AL governor Wallace deployed National Guard to stop integration of Tuskegee High
September 2, 2014

 click for more...

SYNDICATION

Add This Day at Law to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to This Day at Law alerts via R|mail. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.
MyBlogAlerts also e-mails alerts of new This Day at Law entries. It's free and fast, but ad-based.

CONTACT

This Day at Law welcomes reader comments, tips, URLs, updates and corrections. E-mail us at archives@jurist.org