JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh

THIS DAY AT LAW
Today in legal history...

Monday, January 09, 2012

NDNY refused to dismiss Albany terror case despite alleged FBI entrapment
Cynthia Miley at 12:00 AM ET

On January 9, 2006, the US District Court for the Northern District of New York held that two Muslim men accused of supporting terrorism would stand trial despite claims of entrapment. The defendants, Yassin Aref and Mohammed Hossain, had been arrested in August 2004 and accused of laundering money for an FBI informant posing as an arms dealer. According to prosecutors, the two allegedly accepted some $50,000 which the informant told them originated from the sale of a missile intended to kill a Pakistani diplomat in New York City. In March 2006, the judge issued a highly unusual classified ruling rejecting a defense motion to dismiss the case. The two men were convicted a year later and were each sentenced to 15 years in prison. They were also ordered to forfeit $40,000, and pay special fines of $1,000 and $4,000 respectively.

Learn more about the laws governing terrorism and money laundering from the JURIST news archive.




Link post | IM post | go to JURIST | © JURIST, 2012


LATEST DAYS

 Former Rwanda politician convicted of genocide
September 2, 2014

 AL governor Wallace deployed National Guard to stop integration of Tuskegee High
September 2, 2014

 click for more...

SYNDICATION

Add This Day at Law to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to This Day at Law alerts via R|mail. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.
MyBlogAlerts also e-mails alerts of new This Day at Law entries. It's free and fast, but ad-based.

CONTACT

This Day at Law welcomes reader comments, tips, URLs, updates and corrections. E-mail us at archives@jurist.org