JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh

Today in legal history...

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Georgia high court declared right of interpreter for defendants
Cynthia Miley at 12:00 AM ET

On November 22, 2010, the Supreme Court of Georgia ruled that defendants with limited English proficiency have a constitutional right to court interpreters in criminal trials. The Georgia Court of Appeals denied Annie Ling's motion for a new trial after a jury convicted her of cruelty to children in the first degree. Ling's native language was Mandarin Chinese, and she claimed the court relied on her husband to act as her interpreter. The court held that a lack of an interpreter could impede a defendant's right to be present at trial in violation of the Sixth Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) submitted a brief [PDF] on behalf of Ling. The ACLU and many other rights groups have spoken out in support of court interpreters for defendants with limited English proficiency.

State flag of Georgia

Learn more about the Due Process Clause from the JURIST news archive.

Link post | IM post | go to JURIST | © JURIST, 2011


 Congress approved voting machines in federal elections
February 14, 2016

 Israel parliament meets for the first time
February 14, 2016

 click for more...


Add This Day at Law to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL


Subscribe to This Day at Law alerts via R|mail. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.
MyBlogAlerts also e-mails alerts of new This Day at Law entries. It's free and fast, but ad-based.


This Day at Law welcomes reader comments, tips, URLs, updates and corrections. E-mail us at archives@jurist.org