JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh

Today in legal history...

Saturday, March 05, 2011

Supreme Court denied standing in Colorado redistricting case
Dwyer Arce at 12:00 AM ET

On March 5, 2007, the US Supreme Court ruled per curiam in Lance v. Coffman that four Republican voters in Colorado did not have standing to challenge a court-ordered congressional redistricting plan. A state judge in Colorado drew up a redistricting plan in 2002 when the state legislature was unable to agree on a plan in time for elections that year. The legislature drew up a plan in 2003, but that plan was rejected by the Colorado Supreme Court because the state constitution only allows for a new plan once per decade. The state supreme court held that "judicially-created districts are just as binding and permanent as districts created by the General Assembly." The plaintiffs argued that their rights had been violated under the Elections Clause of the US Constitution.

Learn more about the US Supreme Court and redistricting from the JURIST news archive.

Link post | IM post | go to JURIST | © JURIST, 2011


 Greenwich Mean Time established as universal standard
October 13, 2015

 Rosenbergs' espionage appeal denied by Supreme Court
October 13, 2015

 click for more...


Add This Day at Law to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL


Subscribe to This Day at Law alerts via R|mail. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.
MyBlogAlerts also e-mails alerts of new This Day at Law entries. It's free and fast, but ad-based.


This Day at Law welcomes reader comments, tips, URLs, updates and corrections. E-mail us at archives@jurist.org