JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh

THIS DAY AT LAW
Today in legal history...

Saturday, March 05, 2011

Supreme Court denied standing in Colorado redistricting case
Dwyer Arce at 12:00 AM ET

On March 5, 2007, the US Supreme Court ruled per curiam in Lance v. Coffman that four Republican voters in Colorado did not have standing to challenge a court-ordered congressional redistricting plan. A state judge in Colorado drew up a redistricting plan in 2002 when the state legislature was unable to agree on a plan in time for elections that year. The legislature drew up a plan in 2003, but that plan was rejected by the Colorado Supreme Court because the state constitution only allows for a new plan once per decade. The state supreme court held that "judicially-created districts are just as binding and permanent as districts created by the General Assembly." The plaintiffs argued that their rights had been violated under the Elections Clause of the US Constitution.



Learn more about the US Supreme Court and redistricting from the JURIST news archive.




Link post | IM post | go to JURIST | © JURIST, 2011


LATEST DAYS

 Convention on Cybercrimes opens for signature
November 23, 2014

 President Harding signed "anti-beer bill"
November 23, 2014

 click for more...

SYNDICATION

Add This Day at Law to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to This Day at Law alerts via R|mail. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.
MyBlogAlerts also e-mails alerts of new This Day at Law entries. It's free and fast, but ad-based.

CONTACT

This Day at Law welcomes reader comments, tips, URLs, updates and corrections. E-mail us at archives@jurist.org