THIS DAY AT LAW
Today in legal history...

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Ninth Circuit held employer make-up requirement not discriminatory

On December 28, 2004, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled 2-1 that requiring female employees to wear makeup while serving customers did not constitute sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 USC § 2000e et seq.]. The complaint was filed after Harrah's Casino in Reno, Nevada began requiring gender specific standards for male and female employees. The plaintiff, a bartender for nearly 20 years, refused to wear make-up and was terminated. She argued that the policy constituted disparate treatment sex discrimination. In dismissing the claim, the court found that there was not enough evidence to demonstrate that the requirements imposed greater burdens on women than those imposed on men.



Learn more about Title VII from the JURIST news archive.




Link post | IM post | go to JURIST | © JURIST, 2010


LATEST DAYS

 New Zealand women become the first to vote in a national election
November 28, 2014

 Ku Klux Klan trials began in South Carolina
November 28, 2014

 click for more...

SYNDICATION

Add This Day at Law to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to This Day at Law alerts via R|mail. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.
MyBlogAlerts also e-mails alerts of new This Day at Law entries. It's free and fast, but ad-based.

CONTACT

This Day at Law welcomes reader comments, tips, URLs, updates and corrections. E-mail us at JURIST@pitt.edu