Federal appeals court hears arguments on same-sex marriage

[JURIST] A three-judge panel from the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit [official website] heard arguments Tuesday on Wisconsin and Indiana's ban on same-sex marriage. The oral arguments lasted an hour and 40 minutes, during which judges directed tough questions [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel report] to both sides. Some judges called the states' support of bans "absurd" and "ridiculous." Federal Judge Richard Posner [official website] reportedly balked [AP report] when Wisconsin Assistant Attorney General Timothy Samuelson made the argument that "tradition" should preserve the ban on same-sex marriage. Posner responded to this argument by stating that "It was tradition to not allow blacks and whites to marry—a tradition that got swept away" and that a ban on same-sex marriage is rooted in a "tradition of hate." A ruling from the Seventh Circuit is in the near future.

Since the US Supreme Court struck down [JURIST report] section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act [text] last year, numerous state and federal courts have declared state same-sex marriage bans [JURIST backgrounder] unconstitutional. In June a federal judge in Indiana ruled the state's ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional [JURIST report]. Also in June the ACLU challenged Alabama's same sex marriage ban, days after Wisconsin's same-sex marriage ban [JURIST reports] was struck down. In May a federal judge struck down [JURIST report] Pennsylvania's same sex marriage ban. That followed a similar ruling in Oregon, where a federal judge struck down [JURIST report] that state's same sex marriage ban as well. Nineteen US states currently allow same-sex marriage, and more than 70 lawsuits are pending in all 31 others.

 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.