North Dakota moves to dismiss challenge to same-sex marriage ban

[JURIST] The office of the North Dakota Attorney General [official website] on Wednesday filed a motion to dismiss [PDF] a challenge to the state's constitutional amendment [PDF] limiting marriage to a union between one man and one woman. Seven couples challenged [JURIST report] the law in June, alleging that it violates the equal protection, due process and right-to-travel clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment [text] to the US Constitution. In his motion to dismiss, North Dakota Solicitor General Doug Bahr argues [Guardian report] that nothing in the US Constitution prevents North Dakota from limiting the definition of marriage to a union between one man and one woman, and that federal case law supports a state's right not to recognize an out-of-state marriage that would be illegal by North Dakota's laws. North Dakota was the last remaining state that had not had its same-sex marriage ban challenged.

This motion comes in spite of a string of rulings across the US that have struck down many states' same-sex marriage [JURIST backgrounder] bans, after the US Supreme Court struck down [JURIST report] section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) [text]. Earlier this month, a federal judge struck down [JURIST report] Kentucky's constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. In June a federal judge struck down Indiana's same-sex marriage ban [JURIST report]. Also in June Winsconsin's same-sex marriage ban was struck down, and Pennsylvania's ban on same-sex marriage was struck down [JURIST reports] in May. That ruling came after a similar ruling striking down [JURIST report] Oregon's same-sex marriage ban the day before.

 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.