Appeals court extends stay blocking new restrictions on use of abortion drugs in Arizona

[JURIST] A federal appeals court panel ruled [order, PDF] on Tuesday to continue to block new regulations on the use of abortion medication while a case against them plays out in court. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] blocked the Arizona rules last week [JURIST report]. Attorney General Tom Horne [official website] asked the court [AP report] to allow them to take effect, arguing that Planned Parenthood Arizona did not have enough evidence to show that the regulations were detrimental. In rejecting Horne's argument, the three-judge panel said that patients will likely suffer irreparable harm if the rules take effect because they will immediately lose access to a common abortion procedure. The new rules, which restrict the distribution of the so-called "abortion pill" from nine weeks to seven weeks, are among the most stringent regulations on abortion medication in the country.

The debate over reproductive rights [JURIST backgrounder] has been contentious throughout the US and particularly combative in the state of Arizona. Last month the Arizona House of Representatives approved [JURIST report] a bill that would allow for unannounced inspections of licensed abortion clinics. In January the US Supreme Court declined to rule in Horne v. Isaacson [SCOTUSblog backgrounder], bypassing its opportunity to rule on Arizona's new ban of abortions at 20 weeks of pregnancy. In August the Ninth Circuit ruled [JURIST report] against an Arizona law that would disqualify health providers which perform abortions, such as Planned Parenthood from receiving public funds.

 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.