Federal judge postpones ruling on Michigan same-sex marriage ban

[JURIST] A judge for the US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan [JURIST report] on Wednesday decided not to rule on the constitutionality of the state's ban against same-sex marriage. Judge Bernard Friedman stated [AP report] that there are still issues to be resolved and set a trial date for February 25, noting that plaintiffs have the right to trial. In a 2004 vote [materials], 59 percent of Michigan citizens approved a state constitutional amendment defining marriage as a union between individuals of the opposite sex. The Michigan Attorney General's Office [official website] has argued that there is no fundamental right to same-sex marriage or adoption and that the state has a legitimate interest in defining marriage. Opponents have argued that the state's ban is hurting the most vulnerable members of society. The case was brought by a Michigan same-sex couple who challenged the state's ban on same-sex marriage and adoption in 2012.

The heated debate regarding same-sex marriage [JURIST backgrounder] is one of the most polarizing [JURIST op-ed] issues currently facing the US legal community. On Tuesday lawyers for two Portland same-sex couples filed a lawsuit [JURIST report] in the US District Court for the District of Oregon [official website] challenging the state's ban on same-sex marriage. Earlier this week Buncombe County Register of Deeds [official website] Drew Reisinger began accepting [JURIST report] marriage license applications from same-sex couples and requested review of the decision from North Carolina's Attorney General [official website]. A 2012 amendment to North Carolina's Constitution currently bans same-sex marriage [JURIST report]. The Supreme Court of New Jersey [official website] last week agreed to hear an appeal by New Jersey Governor Chris Christie challenging a lower court ruling that same-sex couples must be allowed to marry [JURIST reports]. Last month Michigan's Treasury Department ruled [JURIST report] that same-sex spouses must file separate tax returns. Also last month a judge for the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio expanded a lawsuit [JURIST report] seeking the recognition of same-sex spouses on death certificates.

 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.