Arab League supports Saudi Arabia rejection of UN Security Council seat

[JURIST] Arab League chief Nabil al-Arabi on Sunday declared support of Saudi Arabia's decision to reject a seat on the UN Security Council (UNSC) [official website] after several Arab ambassadors criticized the decision earlier this week. The UN awarded Saudi Arabia a two-year position on the UNSC Thursday along with Chad, Chile, Lithuania and Nigeria. The Saudi government, however, declined the position [AFP report] Friday and accused the UNSC of applying inconsistent standards and ineffective methods in dealing with the Syrian civil war [JURIST backgrounder]. Reports suggest the Saudi government based its decision partly on the US government's failure to move forward with military action against the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad [BBC profile; JURIST news archive]. al-Arabi supported [AFP report] the Saudi government's decision, stating that the UNSC has failed in its efforts to restore peace in several Arab states. In September the UNSC passed a resolution mandating the destruction of al-Assad's chemical weapons cache, but several other resolutions have been stifled by nations supporting al-Assad's regime. No country has ever rejected a UNSC seat, and if the Saudi government does not overturn its decision, the UN General Assembly will vote on new candidates proposed by Asian-Pacific member states.

The Syrian Civil War has been ongoing since 2011 when opposition groups first began protesting the regime of Bashar al-Assad. In October JURIST Guest Columnist Patricio Galella argued [JURIST op-ed] that, if diplomacy with Syria fails, and the UNSC is deadlocked, states would face a lasting dilemma: violate international law by using force without UNSC authorization or stay still and confirm the weakness of the UN system of collective security. Also in October a team of disarmament experts from the UN and the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) began overseeing the destruction of chemical weapons [JURIST report] by the Syrian government, and will verify that the process is correctly handled. In September UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon reported [JURIST report] that UN inspectors confirmed that "chemical weapons were used on a relatively large scale" in the suburbs of Damascus on August 21, causing numerous civilian casualties in violation of international law. Also in September Ki-moon questioned [JURIST report] the legality of the US' plan to strike Syria.

 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.