Third Circuit rules business cannot challenge birth control mandate

[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Friday that family-owned, profit-making businesses cannot challenge the new federal health care law's birth control mandate on religious grounds. Conestoga Wood Specialties, a Pennsylvania company with 950 employees, maintains a policy not to support "anything that terminates a fertilized embryo." The company objected to the provision of the mandate requiring employers to provide contraceptive coverage to employees, including the "morning-after pill," known as Plan-B Onestep [product website]. The court noted that the First Amendment [text; Cornell LII backgrounder] right to exercise a religious belief—under the Free Exercise Clause—is a "personal right" that exists for the benefit of human beings, not artificial "persons" like corporations:

We do not see how a for-profit, "artificial being, invisible, intangible, and existing only in contemplation of law," that was created to make money could exercise such an inherently "human" right. ... It is one thing for a religious organization to be able to exercise the tenets of its faith ... and another thing for a purely secular corporation to make the same claim.
The three-judge panel noted that the judges could not find a single court opinion, before the lawsuits against the contraception mandate began, that had found that a profit-making corporation doing ordinary business had its own right of "free exercise" of religion.

The 2-1 decision by the Third Circuit conflicts with a recent ruling [JURIST report] by the US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit [official website], which held that for-profit company Hobby Lobby [corporate website] is entitled to bring claims under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) [text]. Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) [text; JURIST backgrounder], private employers with more than 50 employees must provide health insurance that covers a range of birth control and reproductive health screening. Failure to do so can lead to financial penalties of up to $100 a day for each employee who is not provided with such coverage. Some 60 lawsuits are pending around the country, by profit-making businesses and various non-profit institutions, challenging this mandate on religious grounds. In his dissenting opinion, Circuit Judge Kent Jordan argued that "the government takes us down a rabbit hole where religious rights are determined by the tax code, with non-profit corporations able to express religious sentiments while for-profit corporations and their owners are told that business is business and faith is irrelevant." The decision, which created a direct split among federal appeals courts enhanced chances that the US Supreme Court [official website] will take on the issue.

 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.