JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE NEWSBURSTDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.


Thursday, March 21, 2013

Legal experts tell Senate drones require new privacy laws
Matthew Pomy at 9:05 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A group of legal experts testified [webcast] before the Senate Judiciary Committee [official website] Wednesday regarding the growing need for new privacy laws because of the rapid advancement of drone technologies and their increased use. The escalation [AP report] in use and technology have outpaced current privacy laws, according to these experts. The Federal Aviation Administration [official website] has predicted there will be 7,500 civilian drones in the air in five years. They have also recently created six test sites for drones around the country and have accepted applications to create 37 more. The experts testified [hearing materials] that if the privacy laws surrounding the drones are not addressed, the full benefits of them may not be realized. One such proposal was a law requiring a warrant to be acquired before law enforcement agencies could use a drone for surveillance, except in emergency situations. While one expert called for a brightline federal law on the matter, another raised concerns this approach would be too broad and called for a state focused approach.

The use of drones by the US has been a growing concern, especially in a military context. Last week a federal appeals court reversed [JURIST report] a ruling on CIA drone records saying the CIA had to comment on the drone strike records. The week before that, Attorney General Eric Holder wrote a letter [JURIST report] to Senator Rand Paul suggesting that a drone strike on US soil would be legal only in extraordinary circumstances following. In January, UN Special Rapporteur on human rights and counter-terrorism Ben Emmerson announced that he will begin investigating [JURIST report] the legality of the use of drone strikes. Following a request to allow an independent investigation [JURIST report] into the use of targeted killings last year, Emmerson stated that there is still no consensus among the international community as to the legality of the conduct.




Link |  | print | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST LEGAL NEWS

 UK judge upholds request to withhold evidence in Russian spy death investigation
5:26 PM ET, May 19

 Afghanistan parliament blocks women's rights legislation
4:06 PM ET, May 19

 Rights groups urge Cameroon to drop charges against transgender youths
11:45 AM ET, May 19

 click for more...

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

LATEST FORUM

In Alabama, "Back Door" Restrictions on Abortion and Roe
DOMESTIC
LaJuana Davis
Cumberland School of Law

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org