JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE ARCHIVEDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.
Listen to Paper Chase!


Legal news from Sunday, March 17, 2013




Egypt court acquits former ministers of corruption charges
Jaimie Cremeans on March 17, 2013 2:38 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Egypt's criminal court on Saturday acquitted former ministers of tourism and housing, Zohair Garanah and Ahmed al-Maghrabi, of charges of corruption. Both men were charged with profiteering and illegally selling state-owned land during their time as ministers under former president Hosni Mubarak [JURIST news archive]. Garanah was originally convicted [JURIST report] of corruption charges and sentenced to three years in prison in 2011, but a retrial [Albawaba report] was ordered in February. Al-Maghrabi was also convicted [JURIST report] and sentenced to five years in prison in 2011, but Egypt's Court of Cassation [ESIS backgrounder] canceled that verdict in December. Both men currently remain in prison in Cairo, however, on other charges.

Since the ousting of Mubarak [JURIST report] following the Egyptian Revolution [JURIST backgrounder] in 2011, the country has been working to prosecute Mubarak and members of his regime for corruption and other charges. Last month a court ordered the release [JURIST report] of former chief of staff Zakaria Azmi after an appeals court reversed his conviction for corruption charges and ordered a retrial. Weeks earlier, a court sentenced former interior minister Habib el-Adly [JURIST news archives] to abuse of power for forcing public workers to perform work on his home. Mubarak's own conviction and life sentence was overturned [JURIST reports], and a retrial was ordered in January. The judge who ordered the retrial did not release the reasons for his ruling, but a retrial had been anticipated after the trial judge made it clear that the prosecution lacked hard evidence to support the charges.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


UN member nations adopt plan to end violence against women
Jaimie Cremeans on March 17, 2013 2:09 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] More than 130 UN member states on Friday agreed [press release] to adopt new measures to prevent and eliminate violence against women and girls in a document produced at the conclusion of the 57th Session of the Commission on the Status of Women [official website] in New York City. The document, called the Agreed Conclusions, condemns violence against women in all forms and calls for prevention in the form of raising awareness through education as well as addressing political, economic and social gender inequalities. According to a statement released by the Commission, the document also "highlights the importance of putting in place multi-sectoral services for survivors of violence, including for health, psychological support and counseling, social support in the short and long term." UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said [press release] that he hopes all of the countries who participated in the "historic session" will "translate this agreement into concrete action to prevent and end violence against women and girls."

The UN and others have been working lately to increase awareness and prevention of violence against women. Earlier this month, UN officials urged governments [JURIST report] to take steps to "turn decades of empty promises into concrete change" when it comes to women's rights, and cautioned that violence against women is still a serious problem throughout the world. That same day, US President Barack Obama signed into law [JURIST report] an updated version of the Violence Against Women Act [text, PDF], which expired in 2011 and provides for legal assistance, counseling and other resources for domestic violence and rape victims. Days earlier, legislators from UN member states discussed the importance [JURIST month] of new laws punishing and preventing sexual, domestic and gender violence at the Commission on the Status of Women's annual session.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Kenya PM Raila Odinga appeals election results
Michael Haggerson on March 17, 2013 11:41 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga [official website; Al Jazeera profile] on Friday appealed the results of Kenya's 2013 election [JURIST report] to Kenya's Supreme Court. Kenya's election commission declared Uhuru Kenyatta [BBC profile; JURIST news archive], son of Kenya's first president Mzee Jomo Kenyatta, the winner of the nation's 2013 presidential election earlier this month. Odinga has accused electoral authorities of "electoral theft" [press release] and stated that he is appealing the results of the election to "ensure elections count." Police dispersed [BBC report] a crowd of Odinga's supporters outside the Kenyan Supreme Court after they were told that they would not be allowed to congregate. Odinga called on his supporters to not resort to violence and stated that he would respect the decision of the Supreme Court, whatever the result.

The challenge to the election results comes five years after Kenya's disputed 2007 election [JURIST news archive] which resulted in several of Kenya's leaders being charged before the International Criminal Court (ICC) [official website] with crimes against humanity. Last week the ICC dropped [JURIST report] the crimes against humanity charges against former Kenyan cabinet secretary Francis Muthaura [case materials] after encountering various issues with evidence and witness testimony. Earlier this month the ICC agreed to delay [JURIST report] until July the trials of Kenyatta and Muthaura. Last month Kenyatta and Muthaura asked [JURIST report] the ICC to review the decision to move forward with the trial. In December, Kenyatta and former cabinet minister William Ruto [case materials] announced [JURIST report] that they would be running together in the March elections despite the upcoming trials. In October the ICC called for complete cooperation [JURIST report] from the Kenyan government in the investigation and trial process. Journalist Joshua Arap Sang is also facing trial alongside Ruto for crimes against humanity. In June the ICC expressed its desire to start Kenyatta's and Ruto's trials simultaneously [JURIST report] to avoid any appearance of bias in the March 2013 presidential election.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Federal judge rules national security security letters unconstitutional
Michael Haggerson on March 17, 2013 10:13 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A judge for the US District Court for the Northern District of California [official website] ruled [order, PDF] Thursday that the use of national security letters [CRS backgrounder, PDF; FBI backgrounder] under 18 USC § 2709 [text] is unconstitutional. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) [advocacy website] challenged [press release] the use of national security letters by the FBI [official website] on behalf of an unnamed telecommunication company. The statute allows the FBI to issue national security letters without court approval, requiring telecommunication companies to turn over information about their subscribers. Furthermore, the nondisclosure provision of the law prohibits the telecommunications companies from revealing anything pertaining to the national security letters, including notifying the individual for which information was sought. The judge held that the nondisclosure provision is not narrowly tailored to a compelling government interest because "the government has not shown that it is generally necessary to prohibit recipients from disclosing the mere fact of their receipt of NSLs." The EFF stated that "[t]he First Amendment prevents the government from silencing people and stopping them from criticizing its use of executive surveillance power." The order was stayed 90 days to give the government time to appeal.

The EFF has strongly opposed controversial domestic surveillance by the US government. In November the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California (ACLU-NC) [advocacy website] joined with the EFF to challenge [JURIST report] portions of the Californians Against Sexual Exploitation (CASE) Act [campaign website] that requires all registered sex offenders, even those with decades-old misdemeanors and non-Internet related offenses, to turn in their Internet usage information to law enforcement. In September 2011 the EFF urged the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] to preserve two lawsuits [JURIST report] over the warrantless surveillance of US citizens. In January 2011 the EFF released a report [JURIST report] stating that between 2001 and 2008 the FBI committed approximately 800 violations of laws, executive orders, or other regulations governing intelligence investigations.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST OP-ED

The War on Terror and the Need for Muslim Support
DOMESTIC
Faisal Kutty
Valparaiso University Law School

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

SYNDICATION

Add Paper Chase legal news to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to Paper Chase by e-mail. JURIST offers a free once-a-day digest [sample]. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.


R|mail e-mails individual Paper Chase posts through the day. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.

PUBLICATION

Join top US law schools, federal appeals courts, law firms and legal organizations by publishing Paper Chase legal news on your public website or intranet.

JURIST offers a news ticker and preformatted headline boxes updated in real time. Get the code.

Feedroll provides free Paper Chase news boxes with headlines or digests precisely tailored to your website's look and feel, with content updated every 15 minutes. Customize and get the code.

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org