British Columbia judge strikes down minimum sentence for firearm possession Samuel Franklin at 11:37 AM ET
[JURIST] A judge for the Provincial Court of British Columbia [official website] on Friday ruled that the federal government's mandatory-minimum sentence for the possession of a loaded and prohibited firearm is arbitrary and fundamentally unjust. Judge James Bahen ruled [CBC report] in the case of Glenn Harley Tetsuji Sheck, a 29-year-old male with no prior criminal record who was arrested by police and found with a loaded Glock 9-millimeter semi-automatic handgun outside a Surrey restaurant in November 2010. The Canadian Criminal Code stipulates [§ 95(1)] that any party found guilty of possessing a loaded handgun shall be sentenced to a minimum imprisonment of three years. Sheck's defense lawyer argued that the mandatory sentence amounted to cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms [text], and Bahen agreed [Globe and Mail report].
In the previous two years the Ontario Superior Court has handed down separate rulings, R. v. Smickle and R. v. Nur [opinions], in which similar sentences were upheld [JURIST report]. Such cases present a significant challenge to Canada's current mandatory minimum sentence requirements. According to a spokesman for British Columbia's criminal justice branch, the Canadian Crown [official website] will be reviewing the decision to assess the appropriate next steps. Under section 1 of the Charter, the Crown may allow laws which restrict Charter rights as long as they can be "demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society."
Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.