JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE ARCHIVEDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.
Listen to Paper Chase!


Legal news from Wednesday, October 31, 2012




UK Supreme Court rejects detainee request for release from US prison in Afghanistan
Maureen Cosgrove on October 31, 2012 12:58 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Supreme Court of the UK [official website] on Wednesday quashed [judgment, PDF] a request for release from a 30-year-old individual detained by US officials at an Afghan prison. Yunus Rahmatullah, a citizen of Pakistan, was arrested by British forces in 2004 and was subsequently transferred to US officials who held him at Parwan prison without charges or trial for several years. The UK Court of Appeal [official website] had granted a writ of habeas corpus to Rahmatullah in 2011, reasoning that Rahmatullah's detention was unlawful. It also held that, because he was captured by British forces, the UK judicial system has jurisdiction over his case. However, US officials failed to comply with the ruling despite acknowledging that Rahmatullah was not a security threat, and the order has since been cancelled [AP report]. The judges concluded that the order to cancel the habeas ruling was lawful because US authorities believed Rahmatullah's detention was lawful and were therefore unwilling to release the detainee to UK authorities.

A similar situation took place in May, when an Afghan detainee who was handed over to authorities in Afghanistan by UK forces won permission [JURIST report] to challenge the legality of his transfer. He argued that he had been tortured by Afghanistan officials until he confessed that he was a member of the Taliban. The Open Society Institute of New York and the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission [advocacy websites] alleged in March that US detainees were sent to a National Directorate of Security (NDS) facility in Kandahar, which was condemned [JURIST reports] by the UN in October for "systematically tortur[ing]" prisoners during interrogations. Afghan officials denied the torture allegations [JURIST report], claiming that there was no basis for the UN's findings.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Croatia court sentences former policemen for torture during war of independence
Keith Herting on October 31, 2012 10:58 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A Croatian court on Wednesday sentenced five former policemen to between one and three years in prison for their roles in torturing ethnic Serb prisoners during Croatia's 1991-95 war for independence. Judge Marijan Garac of the Zagreb County Court [official website, in Croatian] handed down the sentences [Slobodna Dalmacija report, in Croatian] for the policemen who had been guards at a prisoner camp and were previously found guilty of abusing those detained. Former prisoners testified that they while they were held in the Kerestinec camp they would routinely be brought into what was called the "black room" where they would be beaten, subjected to electrical shocks and sexually abused by the guards. The camp, located just outside of the capital Zagreb, housed dozens of male and female prisoners detained by Croatian independence forces from December 1991 until May 1995.

This case is underscored by the ongoing pressure from the EU for Croatia to sort out corruption and address human rights abuses from its war of independence before it joins the EU in July 2013. The push to join the EU has been a primary focus [JURIST op-eds] of the nation's rulers for years. In January of this year the Croatian people voted in favor of joining the EU a month after the government signed a treaty [JURIST reports] to finalize its EU accession. The EU gave final approval [JURIST report] to Croatian membership in June after six years of negotiations. The EU had previously suspended accession talks [JURIST report] in 2005 when it felt Croatia was not cooperating fully with International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia investigations into war crimes against its former military officers.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Kuwait arrests opposition leader for negative comments against regime
Matthew Pomy on October 31, 2012 10:25 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Opposition leader and former MP Mussallam Al Barrak [Gulf News backgrounder] was arrested on Tuesday after criticizing leader Emir Shaikh Sabah Al Ahmad Al Sabah, which is a crime under Kuwait's constitution. Barrak was arrested [Gulf News Report] after a public speech on October 15 was found to contain remarks detrimental to the "social and political balance of the country." His remarks broke the silence surrounding criticisms of the regime that has lasted for decades. The rally was in opposition to a controversial election law that the opposition claims is illegal and will establish a rubber stamp parliament. Despite stern warnings against further protests, the opposition is planning another rally after riot police broke up a rally on October 21 that is being called the largest in Kuwaiti history. The public is sharply divided [Gulf News report] on Barrak's arrest with some attacking the law while others simply claim he broke the law and should be subject to it like anyone else.

Kuwait's constitutional court upheld [JURIST report] the election law in September. In August, leaders of the political opposition in Kuwait criticized [JURIST report] the government's efforts to change the country's election law through the Constitutional Court, saying the government is attempting to seize power through the court in violation of the constitution. The government announced in August that they had asked the national Constitutional Court to review the legality of the country's election law. In June the Constitutional Court ruled that this year's election for the new parliament was unconstitutional [JURIST report] and the previous parliament of 2009 should be reinstated, thereby removing the opposition-controlled parliament, and restoring a more government-friendly body.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Ex-Yugoslav army chief begins appeal to ICTY
Julia Zebley on October 31, 2012 10:02 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Ex-Yugoslav army chief Momcilo Perisic [ICTY profile, PDF; JURIST news archive] began his appeal [redacted brief, PDF] before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) [official website] on Tuesday in an attempt to overturn his conviction [JURIST report] on crimes against humanity and war crimes committed during the wars in Bosnia and Croatia. Perisic, the only Yugoslav officer to be convicted, was sentenced to 27 years in prison and appealed the conviction in April. Perisic began his appeal by denouncing the decision as unprecedented [Reuters report], stating that never before has a Chief of Staff been convicted for crimes committed by opposing forces. In his brief, Perisic made a similar argument:
Momcilo Perisic's case is the only case before this Tribunal of a senior officer of one army being found guilty for crimes committed by members of a distinct army in a foreign country. It highlights the importance of a fundamental principle of national and international criminal law—that individual criminal liability is based on personal guilt, not state responsibility. This judgement ignores the reality that relations between states are often reinforced by the provision of significant military aid, in finding Perisic's provision of assistance renders him individually criminally responsible for aiding and abetting the crimes committed during the war. Many foreign armies are dependent, to various degrees, upon such assistance to function. [...] If Perisic's convictions are sustained, it will have a chilling effect on international relations as under the Majority's reasoning a commander of any army can be found responsible for crimes committed by any troops of any nation simply by giving logistical or technical assistance to prosecute a war. The outcome of this appeal is not only of great importance to Perisic but also to political and military leaders throughout the world.
Perisic is seeking a full acquittal.

Perisic was found guilty of 12 out of 13 charges, including aiding and abetting murders occurring during the Srebrenica massacre [JURIST news archive], inhumane acts, attacks on civilians, unjust persecutions and having knowingly supplied "extensive logistical assistance" to the Army of Republika Srpska (VRS) and the Army of Serbian Krajina (SVK) that would be used to torture and kill hundreds of Muslim civilians. He was also found guilty on the basis of command responsibility for the inhumane acts of his officers and subsequently failing to punish them. In March UN prosecutors demanded that Perisic receive a life sentence [JURIST report] for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed against Bosnian Muslims in the early 1990s. Perisic's trial began [JURIST report] in October 2008, and closing arguments concluded at the end of March. ICTY Prosecutor Mark Harmon said Perisic was one of the "principal collaborators" of late Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic [JURIST news archive], claiming in his opening statement that Perisic "created an environment of impunity, wherein his subordinates were encouraged and did persist to commit crimes, knowing there would be no consequences." Perisic turned himself in to the UN in 2005, surrendering to officials [JURIST report] from the ICTY.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Egypt court rules only president can void peace treaty
Keith Herting on October 31, 2012 9:52 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A court in Cairo on Tuesday threw out a lawsuit against Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi [BBC profile; JURIST news archive] intended to nullify the 1979 Camp David Peace Accord with Israel. The court, which is charged with solving administrative concerns, determined [Ahram Online report] that the issues were a matter of sovereignty which only the president had the authority to choose to enforce. The lawsuit was brought by Egypt's Revolutionary Youth Union who believe that the terms of the peace accord are contrary to the interests of Egyptian citizens and that those terms should be amended or discarded in entirety so that new arrangements might be made with Israel. The issue of greatest concern to the Revolutionary Youth is the restriction on troops in the Sinai Peninsula which the group believes is causing an increase in militant groups in the area.

Despite the success of a peaceful presidential election, Egypt has faced continued political turmoil since the overthrow of former president Hosni Mubarak last year. In August a lawyer in Egypt filed an appeal challenging a declaration by Morsi granting himself complete legislative and executive power [JURIST reports]. In July, a few days after he was sworn in, Morsi issued a decree [JURIST reports] calling the dissolved Egyptian parliament back into session, despite a previous ruling by the country's Supreme Constitutional Court [official website] dissolving it due to its finding that one-third of its members were elected illegally. The court suspended Morsi's decree two days later, after which Morsi vowed that he would respect the ruling [JURIST reports]. Days before its dissolution, the Egyptian parliament elected a new constitutional council after lawmakers finally reached an agreement [JURIST reports] on the political composition of the council. In April the country's Administrative Court temporarily suspended [JURIST report] the work of the Egyptian Constituent Assembly after ruling in favor of a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the formation of the panel.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Rights group urges justice for victims of sexual violence during Bosnian civil war
Matthew Pomy on October 31, 2012 9:33 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Amnesty International (AI) [advocacy website] called Wednesday for reparations and greater recognition for the victims of sexual violence during [press release] the Bosnian Civil War [JURIST news archive]. The briefing paper [text, PDF] calls on the Republika Srpska (RS) [official website] to recognize that widespread sexual violence occurred during the war and to take steps to address the specific needs of those victims. AI suggested this should be done by gathering information about the victims to assess their needs, ensuring that proper medical and psychological care is available, amending the law on civilian victims to cover a broad array of injuries resulting from sexual violence, and making NGO's and other victims' associations available to provide support. AI emphasized that justice for the survivors requires both prosecution of the perpetrators and rehabilitation of the victims. While the RS is making progress in the prosecution, its silence on the issues directly affecting the victims of sexual violence is unacceptable for AI.

Bosnian courts have continued prosecuting individuals responsible for human rights abuses, especially surrounding the 1995 Srebrenica massacre [BBC backgrounder; JURIST news archive]. Earlier this month a Bosnian court acquitted two policemen [JURIST report] accused of war crimes. In June the country's war crimes court sentenced [JURIST report] four former Bosnian Serb soldiers for their involvement in the 1995 massacre. In May US resident Dejan Radojkovic was deported [JURIST report] to Bosnia and Herzegovina to stand trial before the country's court for his actions as a police commander in Srebrenica during the 1995 massacre. He was arrested in 2009 after it was revealed that he did not disclose his involvement in the conflict and his appeal was rejected in February. He was the second to be deported after his commanding officer, Nedjo Ikonic, was deported in 2010 [JURIST report]. A day earlier the war crimes court convicted [JURIST report] Dusko Jevic and Mendeljev Djuric for taking part in the killing of 1,000 Muslim men during the massacre after it found that the two former Bosnian Serb police officers were guilty of aiding and abetting genocide.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Italy passes anti-corruption law
Maureen Cosgrove on October 31, 2012 9:07 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti [official website, in Italian] on Tuesday approved a new law that imposes harsher sanctions on officials engaged in corruption in both the public and private sectors. Public officials convicted of abuse of office, bribery and exploiting government influence in return for favors or payments will receive increased prison sentences under the new law [Corriere della Sera report, in Italian]. The law also imposes higher sanctions [Reuters report] for corruption in the private sector. Convicted officials are prohibited from running for public office. The law also requires that local administrations create plans for curbing corruption and demands transparency with respect to local finances, requiring these offices to post budgets and public works project costs online. Finally, the anti-corruption law protects the identities of whistle blowers.

The new anti-corruption law is part of Italy's effort to renew its reputation after corruption ran rampant during the rule of former prime minister Silvio Berlusconi [BBC profile; JURIST news archive]. Earlier this week Berlusconi was found guilty of tax fraud [JURIST report] and sentenced to four years in prison on charges that his media empire Mediaset [corporate website, in Italian] purchased television rights for US movies through offshore companies and falsely declared the costs on its taxes. Berlusconi, who stepped down as prime minister last November, has been a defendant in nearly 50 cases but has never served a single prison sentence due to either successfully appealing or having the statute of limitations on the charge expire. In addition to the tax fraud charges, he is also facing charges of publicly releasing private wiretaps, embezzlement and paying for sex with an underage prostitute [JURIST reports] and abusing his power by having the police release her. In January 2011 the Italian Constitutional Court held hearings and subsequently struck down [JURIST reports] portions of an immunity law backed by Berlusconi that would have granted the premier and other public officials temporary amnesty from any charges while holding office. The Italian audit court, Corte del Conti [official website, in Italian], announced in February 2010 that the number of corruption cases in Italy had risen by 229 percent [JURIST report] over the previous year.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST OP-ED

In Alabama, "Back Door" Restrictions on Abortion and Roe
DOMESTIC
LaJuana Davis
Cumberland School of Law

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

SYNDICATION

Add Paper Chase legal news to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to Paper Chase by e-mail. JURIST offers a free once-a-day digest [sample]. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.


R|mail e-mails individual Paper Chase posts through the day. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.

PUBLICATION

Join top US law schools, federal appeals courts, law firms and legal organizations by publishing Paper Chase legal news on your public website or intranet.

JURIST offers a news ticker and preformatted headline boxes updated in real time. Get the code.

Feedroll provides free Paper Chase news boxes with headlines or digests precisely tailored to your website's look and feel, with content updated every 15 minutes. Customize and get the code.

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org