JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE ARCHIVEDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.
Listen to Paper Chase!


Legal news from Wednesday, August 8, 2012




Germany constitutional court grants equal tax benefits to same-sex couples
Sung Un Kim on August 8, 2012 3:32 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany [official website, in German] on Wednesday ruled that homosexual couples in a civil union [JURIST news archive] should receive the same tax benefits as heterosexual married couples. The court held [Deutsche Welle report] that with regard to land transfer tax, gay couples should enjoy the same rights as heterosexual couples and further noted that the decision should apply retroactively, meaning that those couples who did not receive any benefits in the past would be compensated. The judge for the court ruled that the unequal treatment of gay and heterosexual couples before 2010 is unconstitutional without legal justification. In 2010, the law related to land transfer tax was amended to allow the same benefits for gay couples in case of a divorce as heterosexual couples. On Monday, thirteen politicians, members of the country's ruling Christian Democratic Union (CDU) [party website, in German] party, had called [Spiegel report] for the joint-filing tax benefits, which allows married couples to pool their tax rebates and pay less tax, to also to apply to gay couples. Germany has recognized same-sex civil unions since 2001 but there are still areas of rights that they do not enjoy as heterosexual couples.

In 2010, the Federal Constitutional Court had ruled [JURIST report] that a portion of the tax code requiring gay couples to pay a larger inheritance tax than partners in heterosexual marriages is unconstitutional. Before the ruling the German tax code required gay couples to pay between 17 and 50 percent for an inheritance tax upon the death of a partner, while heterosexual married partners are required to pay between 7 and 30 percent for the tax. In June of the same year, an administrative court in Berlin held [JURIST report] that a same-sex marriage performed abroad must be recognized in a registered partnership in Germany. A year earlier the country's constitutional court ruled [JURIST report] that surviving partners in a registered civil partnership have a right to collect under the occupational pension scheme for civil service employees




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Blackwater agrees to settle federal criminal charges
Rebecca DiLeonardo on August 8, 2012 3:11 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The US Department of Justice (DOJ) [official website] announced on Tuesday that private security contractors Blackwater [JURIST news archive], now known as Academi [corporate website], agreed to settle [agreement, PDF] several federal criminal charges dealing with export and firearm violations. Academi agreed to pay a $7.5 million fine. The company also agreed to acknowledge a statement of facts [text, PDF] and to continue to cooperate with law enforcement in future investigations. In exchange, the government has agreed to defer prosecution of Academi for the crimes discussed in the agreement. The agreement is voidable if Academi attempts to deny the statement of facts in the future or if the company engages in future illegal activity. The statement of facts stipulates that Academi acted on its own initiative in

Blackwater and its employees have faced legal controversy in recent years for as a result of the company's prior business practices. In January the company reached a confidential settlement agreement with survivors and families of victims in a 2007 shooting incident [JURIST reports] in the Nisour Square area of Baghdad that left 17 Iraqi civilians dead. Two ex-Blackwater contractors were convicted of manslaughter and sentenced [JURIST reports] to two-and-a-half years in prison last year for their role in the shooting deaths of two Afghan nationals and the wounding of a third. In April a federal grand jury indicted five former Blackwater executives [JURIST report] on charges of weapons violations and lying to investigators. In 2010 the Iraqi government ordered 250 former Blackwater employees to leave Iraq in reaction to the dismissal of criminal charges [JURIST reports] against the guards involved in the 2007 shooting incident. The same month, the DOJ also opened an investigation [JURIST report] into whether Blackwater bribed the Iraqi government to be permitted to continue operating in Iraq following the 2007 shootings. Blackwater ceased operations in Baghdad [JURIST report] in May 2009 when its security contracts expired and were not renewed.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Ukraine president signs Russian language bill
Sung Un Kim on August 8, 2012 2:50 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych [official website] on Wednesday signed into law a bill that makes Russian the official language in parts of former Soviet republic within the country. Opponents of the bill heavily criticized the move, condemning [Reuters report] the bill as a crime against the state. Politicians opposing the new language bill such as Yulia Tymoshenko [personal website; JURIST news archive] and one-time foreign minister Arseny Yatseniuk [official website, in Ukrainian] argued that the act of signing the bill amounts to a crime for which the president should face impeachment. The united opposition Batkivshchyna (Fatherland) [official website, in Ukrainian] has called [press release, in Ukrainian] on local councils to initiate such proceedings against Yanukovych. There are concerns that the new bill may escalate tension among the country's citizens resulting in violence.

The bill was passed [JURIST report] by the Ukrainian parliament earlier in July despite protests and heavy opposition. The legislation would allow Russian in courts, education and other government institutions [AP report] in Russian-speaking regions of the country. The bill went through the parliament a month after it passed [JURIST report] the first reading of a controversial bill. In April 2010 Ukrainian prosecutors considered filing criminal charges after a Parliament session in which lawmakers hurled eggs and smoke bombs and engaged in physical violence in an attempt to prevent a vote [JURIST report] on a Russian treaty. The chaos erupted as lawmakers voted to approved a treaty that extended Russia's lease on a naval base in the Ukrainian Sevastopol port on the Black Sea until 2042 in exchange for discounted Russian gas. The agreement was strongly opposed by pro-Western lawmakers who see Russian influence as reminiscent of Soviet occupation. The treaty came soon after the election [JURIST report] of Yanukovych, who took office in February of that year. Yanukovych replaced Viktor Yushchenko [JURIST news archive], who had sought to cut ties with Russia and strengthen relationships with Western Europe. Yushchenko opposed the extension of Russia's Black Sea lease.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


ACLU challenges Puerto Rico protest law
Rebecca DiLeonardo on August 8, 2012 2:34 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) [advocacy website] on Tuesday filed a lawsuit challenging a new Puerto Rican law that limits the rights of protesters in the commonwealth. The new law, approved by Puerto Rican Governor Luis Fortuno last week, bans certain kinds of protests and includes penalties of up to three years in prison for some violations. The complaint alleges that the language of the new statute is vague and could lead to uneven application of the law. The ACLU filed the challenge as an amendment [WP report] to a prior complaint [text, PDF; JURIST report] against the Puerto Rico Police Department (PRPD) [official website, in Spanish] alleging that they violated the rights of protesters. The original lawsuit was filed just after the ACLU released a report alleging widespread abuses [JURIST report] by the PRPD. The report documents numerous instances of excessive use of force to suppress speech, subdue protesters, and target ethnic and racial minorities. The amended complaint also calls on the PRPD to create a comprehensive policy on the use of force against protesters.

Police abuse is a subject of international concern. Human Rights Watch (HRW) reported [JURIST report] in May that China's chengguan, a para-police organization charged with enforcing non-criminal administrative regulations, is abusing its power. In April HRW alleged that Bahrain's police officers regularly abuse minor detainees [JURIST report] before transporting them to police stations. Last October the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan reported that prisoners in some Afghan-run detention facilities had been beaten and tortured [JURIST report]. In June 2011 HRW reported that Iraqi police forces had been beating and illegally detaining protesters [JURIST report].




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Federal judge blocks Florida limit on campaign contributions by minors
Rebecca DiLeonardo on August 8, 2012 1:49 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A federal judge on Monday issued a temporary injunction [order, PDF] barring enforcement of a Florida statute [text] that prevents minors from donating more than $100 to any political candidate or committee within an election period. Under the law, adults are allowed to contribute up to $500 per election. The lawsuit was brought by Julie Towbin, a 17-year-old Florida resident who was unable to purchase a $150 ticket to a political dinner due to concerns about the law, and the suit was supported by the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida (ACLU-FL) [advocacy website]. In her order, the judge found that the law was substantially likely to be a violation of Towbin's First Amendment rights to free expression. In a statement [text] Randall Marshall, Legal Director of the ACLU of Florida praised the decision:
This law put an unconstitutional limit on some citizens' ability to engage in political activities based solely on their age. Our laws should encourage everyone regardless of age—and especially young people—to participate in the political process. Instead, this law took away speech and political participation rights to young citizens.
Florida authorities are barred from enforcing the law until the judge makes a final ruling in the suit. The law did not apply to federal elections.

Florida election laws and policies have faced numerous federal challenges recently. Florida Secretary of State Ken Detzner announced last month that the federal government will allow Florida access [JURIST report] to a US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) immigration database to challenge individuals' voting rights if the state suspects them of not being US citizens. In June a judge for the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida denied a request [JURIST report] by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) to issue a temporary injunction barring Florida from continuing the practice of purging its voter rolls. The DOJ alleged that Florida's policy violates the Voting Rights Act (VRA) [text] as well as the National Voter Registration Act [text], which requires all voter roll maintenance to cease 90 days before the primary election, meaning all purging in Florida should have stopped by May 16. Florida also faces challenges to its purging policy from the ACLU-FL and a coalition of rights groups [JURIST reports] on behalf of several Florida citizens. Earlier in June, amidst calls to end its purging practices, Florida filed suit [JURIST report] seeking access to the DHS immigration database. Earlier that month, a spokesperson for Governor Rick Scott said that the state would continue to search for ineligible voters, even after receiving a letter from the DOJ ordering them to stop the practice [JURIST report].




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Supreme Court refuses to halt Texas execution of man with low IQ
Sung Un Kim on August 8, 2012 1:31 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] on Tuesday denied [order, PDF] an application to stay the Texas execution of a man with in IQ of 61. Justice Antonin Scalia refused [Reuters report] the challenge brought by Marvin Wilson who claimed that his execution is unconstitutional under the 2002 ruling in Atkins v. Virginia [opinion, PDF], which prohibits the execution of mentally retarded persons. Wilson was sentenced to death in 1994, two years after he was convicted of murder for killing a police drug informant. His IQ was determined to be 61—lower than the mentally competent level which is set at 70. Texas however argued that the IQ test was conducted by an intern and that that the result was flawed. Defense lawyers claimed that state officials used nonclinical factors in determining Wilson's mental competency. They also raised the issue that the state allegedly received new evidence demonstrating that their client was not the shooter. However, the Supreme Court did not address the issue. Wilson was executed Tuesday night.

Texas courts had previously stayed an execution of a mentally ill defendant. In July the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals [court website] ordered [JURIST report] a stay of execution [order, PDF] for convicted killer Marcus Druery who had been scheduled for execution on August 1. He had been diagnosed as schizophrenic by both prison and private doctors. In 2009, the Supreme Court ruled [JURIST report] in the case of Bobby v. Bies [Cornell LII backgrounder] that a post-conviction hearing to determine the mental competency of a capital defendant convicted before the Court's 2002 ruling in Atkins does not violate the Double Jeopardy [Cornell LII backgrounder] clause. Despite the ruling in Atkins, in 29 states, including Texas, Tennessee and New Jersey [JURIST reports], the defendant still carries the burden of proving mental retardation in death-penalty [JURIST news archive] cases to receive a lesser sentence.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Ninth Circuit dismisses Islamic charity wiretapping suit
Sung Un Kim on August 8, 2012 12:46 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The US Court for the Ninth Circuit [official website] on Tuesday reversed [opinion, PDF] a lower court's decision in favor of an Oregon-based Islamic nonprofit corporation challenging the Bush administration's warrantless wiretap program. The US District Court for the Northern District of California [official website] held that the federal government implicitly waived sovereign immunity under Section 1810 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) [LII backgrounder]. The court also awarded the Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation [JURIST news archive] $40,800 in damages and $2.5 million in attorney's fees and legal costs. District court Judge Vaughn Walker found [JURIST report] that the National Security Agency (NSA) [official website] warrantless wiretapping program violated the rights of organization under the FISA. Judge Margaret McKeown for the court of appeals, however, held that the lower court was wrong in its decision because Section 1810 of the FISA "does not include an explicit waiver of immunity, nor is it appropriate to imply such a waiver." With its decision, the appeals court also noted that the case raised an important issue of balancing national security and individual liberties:
In light of the complex, ever-evolving nature of this litigation, and considering the significant infringement on individual liberties that would occur if the Executive Branch were to disregard congressionally-mandated procedures for obtaining judicial authorization of international wiretaps, the charge of "game-playing" lobbed by the government is as careless as it is inaccurate.
McKeown noted that the recent decision will end the continuous attempt by the organization to hold the government responsible for wiretapping without judicial authorization.

Al-Haramain filed a motion [JURIST report] for partial summary judgment in July 2009. In February of that year the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling [JURIST reports] denying a government appeal to keep the NSA call log secret, despite its accidental release to Al-Haramain in 2004. The call log had been deemed a state secret [JURIST report], but the decision required the government to allow the foundation to view the document. JURIST contributor Victor Comras said that Walker had done a "truly remarkable job" balancing national security and due process [JURIST comment] in the case. Walker had previously dismissed the suit [JURIST report], finding that Al-Haramain lacked a cause of action because the state secrets privilege trumped procedural requirements under FISA.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Canada court orders judicial review of prison grievance system
Sung Un Kim on August 8, 2012 11:43 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A Canadian federal court judge on Tuesday ordered a judicial review of the nation's prison grievance system. Justice Anne Mactavish for the Federal Court of Canada [official website] held [CBC report] that the backlog in the grievance system is contributing to the increased violence and tension in the nation's prisons. The case arose when Michael Spidal, an inmate in British Columbia who filed several complaints in the past two years, alleged that prison officials repeatedly failed to address inmate complaints in a "fair and expeditious" manner, violating the Corrections and Conditional Release Act [text, PDF]. Howard Sapers [official profile] for the Office of the Correctional Investigator [official website] commented that the recent decision is merely echoing what his office has urged for years and stated that the dysfunctional grievance system is only getting worse in light of the overcrowding in Canadian prisons. Prison officials cited growing backlogs of complaints as the cause for such failure and further alleged that most of the complaints are made in bad faith. Sapers responded that there are other measures to deal with such complaints and argued that only a fraction of all complaints are made in bad faith. Canada had spent $105 million on prison expansions in 2010 anticipating drastic increase in prisoners, a year after Sapers reported that the nation's prisons are operating at their full capacity [JURIST reports].

Overcrowding of prisons has been a problem around the world. Earlier this month the Colombia Ministry of Justice [official website] announced [JURIST report] a new measure to address the problem of overcrowding in the nation's prisons involving a transfer of 800 inmates from "La Modelo" prisons in Bogota and Cali to less crowded detention centers elsewhere in the country. In June UN Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights Kyung-wha Kang [official profile] urged [JURIST report] the government of Malawi to improve its human rights conditions and promote accountability by addressing the problem of overcrowding of prisons and the slow process of justice in the country. During the same month Burundi announced [JURIST report] that the government will release prisoners in order to address the overcrowding in national prisons. In April South Africa announced [JURIST report] that it would issue pardons to 35,000 offenders in order to ease prison overcrowding. Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] in February urged Latin American countries to improve their prison conditions and called [JURIST report] for a reduction of prison population after a fire killed more than 300 inmates of a prison in Honduras. Last August Venezuela announced [JURIST report] its plan to reduce its prison population by 40 percent. The prisons in the US are facing the same problem. In May 2011 the US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [JURIST report] in Brown v. Plata [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] to uphold an order requiring California to release up to 46,000 prisoners to address the problem of prison overcrowding.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Pakistan high court orders PM to explain refusal to reopen case against president
Sung Un Kim on August 8, 2012 11:41 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Supreme Court of Pakistan [official website] on Wednesday ordered Prime Minister Raja Pervez Ashraf [BBC profile] to appear before the court by the end of this month to explain his refusal to reopen the investigation into corruption allegations against President Asif Ali Zardari [official website]. Ashraf may also face contempt of court proceedings like his predecessor Yousuf Raza Gilani [BBC profile; JURIST news archive] if he does not appear before the court on August 27 or continues to refuse to write a letter to Swiss authorities to reopen the case against the president. The tension between the country's judiciary and executive branch has been escalating since the government has refused to follow the high court's order to probe the corruption allegations against the president. Despite the announcement by the Swiss authorities stating that they will not reopen the case against the Pakistani president, the tension continues. Some have argued [WP report] that the judiciary is becoming too powerful. The former prime minister Gilani was disqualified from being a member of Parliament after an April contempt conviction [JURIST reports] and removed from office when he declined to follow the same court order that has been given to Ashraf.

On Monday the government announced that it will petition the high court to review its decision nullifying [JURIST reports] the Contempt of Court Bill 2012 which was passed to shield the country's new prime minister from contempt charges. The bill was passed by the upper [AFP report] and lower houses of the national parliament and signed [JURIST reports] by Zardari last month. The legislature and the president approved the law in order to protect the new PM from possible contempt of court proceedings for failure to reopen the investigation against Zardari. The court had ordered [JURIST report] the new prime minister in late June to investigate the corruption allegations against the president. Ashraf, like his predecessor, has argued that the president is immune from prosecution under the country's constitution. The court in response claimed that no one is above the law and thus, the investigation against the president should proceed. During the same month, a Pakistani court ordered [JURIST report] the arrest of Makhdoom Shahabuddin [BBC profile], a former health minister from Punjab Province and the nominee for the country's then-vacant prime minister position for allegations that he was involved in irregularities in the amount of the controlled drug Ephedrine circulating within the country during his tenure as health minister. The arrest order was issued the same day the president nominated Shahabuddin to fill the position of former prime minister Gilani.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Russia court reduces sentence for Khodorkovsky partner
Rebecca DiLeonardo on August 8, 2012 10:50 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A Russian court on Wednesday reduced the sentence of the former business partner of jailed Russian oil executive Mikhail Khodorkovsky [defense website; JURIST news archive]. Platon Lebedev [defense website; JURIST news archive] has been incarcerated since 2003 for various charges associated with his business partnership with Khodorkovsky. Khodorkovsky and Lebedev are each serving prison sentences for fraud, theft and money laundering, scheduled to run until 2016. Lebedev's 13-year prison sentence was reduced [AP report] Wednesday, moving his scheduled release date to March 2013. Khodorkovsky's sentence will remain intact until an appeal is heard in his case. A senior Russian judge last month ordered a court to review [JURIST report] Khodorkovsky's appeal. Khodorkovsky has denied all the charges and maintains that he was falsely convicted as retribution for funding opposition parties during a former presidency of current President Vladimir Putin [BBC profile]. His former oil company, Yukos Oil [JURIST news archive], was split up and Russian state-controlled oil firm Rosneft eventually bought the largest production assets, making Rosneft the country's biggest oil producer.

Opposition leaders and other groups have shown skepticism about the validity of Khodorkovsky's sentence. In December the Russia Presidential Council on Civil Society and Human Rights under President Dmitry Medvedev called for the prosecutor general to petition to annul the conviction [JURIST report]. Describing the verdict as fictitious, council member and former Constitutional Court judge, Tamara Morshchakova, noted the council found neither evidence nor substance to the charges brought against Khodorkovsky in the second trial. The council's decisions are non-binding and have seldom elicited action from Russian authorities. In July, the council urged amnesty for economic crimes in a meeting with Medvedev that would include amnesty for the crimes of Khodorkovsky. Last year former Russian prime minister Mikhail Kasyanov testified [JURIST report] that former president and current prime minister Vladimir Putin ordered Khodorkovsky's arrest for political reasons, indicating that Khodorkovsky had funded the Communist Party without first getting approval to do so from the president.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Tucson shooter pleads guilty to killing federal judge, wounding congresswoman
Brandon Gatto on August 8, 2012 8:21 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The man charged with killing six people and wounding 13 others in the January 2011 Tucson shooting [USA Today backgrounder] pleaded guilty [DOJ press release] on Tuesday in the US District Court for the Southern District of California [official website] shortly after Judge Larry Alan Burns declared him mentally competent to stand trial. The defendant, Jared Lee Loughner, admitted guilt [LAT report] to 19 of 49 charges [text], including killing a 9-year-old girl and Chief Judge John Roll of the US District Court for the District of Arizona [official website] as well as wounding former congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords [Guardian backgrounder]. In ending an ongoing debate between prosecutors and defense counsel, Burns found that Loughner understood in court that he was responsible for opening fire during Giffords's local constituent meeting in an Arizona parking lot. Both sides then arranged Loughner's ensuing plea, which assuredly sidesteps the death penalty. Loughner will be sentenced on November 15.

Loughner was formally charged [JURIST report] with the Tucson shootings in January 2011. Significant charges included one count of attempted assassination of a member of Congress, two counts of killing an employee of the federal government and two counts of attempting to kill federal employees. Loughner originally invoked his right to remain silent [ABC News report] before the debate regarding his competence stalled legal proceedings for more than a year. Given the circumstances, President Barack Obama [official website] directed that the investigation into the shooting [press releases] be conducted by the FBI.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST OP-ED

The War on Terror and the Need for Muslim Support
DOMESTIC
Faisal Kutty
Valparaiso University Law School

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

SYNDICATION

Add Paper Chase legal news to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to Paper Chase by e-mail. JURIST offers a free once-a-day digest [sample]. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.


R|mail e-mails individual Paper Chase posts through the day. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.

PUBLICATION

Join top US law schools, federal appeals courts, law firms and legal organizations by publishing Paper Chase legal news on your public website or intranet.

JURIST offers a news ticker and preformatted headline boxes updated in real time. Get the code.

Feedroll provides free Paper Chase news boxes with headlines or digests precisely tailored to your website's look and feel, with content updated every 15 minutes. Customize and get the code.

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org