JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE ARCHIVEDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.
Listen to Paper Chase!


Legal news from Wednesday, July 11, 2012




Rights group reports sexual assault a weapon in Syria violence
Dan Taglioli on July 11, 2012 4:23 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A human rights group report was released on Wednesday documenting 81 instances of sexual assault and rape in Syria since anti-government demonstrations began in March 2011. Women Under Siege [advocacy website], a project of the Women's Media Center, has been collecting reports of sexualized violence in Syria for several months, creating a crowd-sourced map [materials] of independently confirmed attacks. The team of doctors, activists, and journalists [The Atlantic report] has taken the 81 confirmed stories and broken them down into 117 separate pieces of data on everything from rape to the consequences of sexualized violence, such as depression, HIV and pregnancy to create a sense of the scope and impact of sexualized violence in Syria. The resulting picture shows that sexual assault appears to be widespread, not limited to any particular city and often involves rape. Women Under Siege reports that while there is no evidence of the government ordering its soldiers and militiamen to rape, nearly 67 percent of the reported assaults were allegedly carried out by government and plainclothes militia forces [Reuters report]. The data collected suggests that sexualized violence is being used as a tool of war in Syria, although probably indiscriminately and not necessarily with an organized strategy. Rape and sexual assault are particularly serious in the Middle East, where the stigma from an attack can shame the victim's entire family and women rape victims can be punished for sexual indiscretion or even forced to marry their rapist.

Syria has been plagued with violence over the past year and a half, and human rights groups have blamed both the government and anti-government groups for the resulting deaths. This week UN Joint Special Envoy Kofi Annan on Monday said that he had reached an agreement with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad [BBC News backgrounder] to end the violent conflict in the country. Annan, who met with Al-Assad on Monday, said the president was committed to ending violence in Syria [UN News Centre report] and that he would continue to work with the UN to achieve peace. Annan said that Al-Assad reaffirmed the Syrian government's commitment to implementing the six-point peace plan [JURIST report] generated at the end of June. Last week Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] reported that Syrian authorities have been maintaining secret detention facilities [JURIST report] to hold and torture prisoners.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Broadcasters challenge political expenditure information disclosure law
Sung Un Kim on July 11, 2012 3:29 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The National Association of Broadcasters [advocacy website] on Tuesday filed an emergency motion [text, PDF] with the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit [official website] challenging a new regulation that is expected to go into effect in August. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) [official website] adopted the new rule [77 Fed. Reg. 27631, PDF] in April requiring broadcasters to disclose political expenditure and advertising information on a central website maintained by the FCC, revealing online the prices broadcasters are charging for specific ad spots. Currently the information is only available in paper form, requiring the person seeking it to devote significant amount of time, money and other resources. The NAB is seeking to block the enforcement of the new rule while legal proceedings are ongoing. The organization argued that the rule would place competitive broadcasters such as ABC, NBC, CBS and Fox [corporate websites] in harmful situations because non-competitive broadcasters are able to obtain the information much easier. Additionally, the organization claimed that the new law is inconsistent with the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA) [materials], which only requires television stations to make available political advertising sales information in form of paper records. If the court rejects the motion, the broadcasters are compelled to publish the information requested on FCC's website beginning August 2.

Fox had a recently won a case against the FCC in Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. [SCOTUSblog backgrounder]. The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled unanimously [JURIST report] that the FCC indecency guidelines were too vague to be properly enforced thereby violating the First and Fifth Amendments [text]. The case arose out of two separate broadcasts including a nudity scene and a celebrity using expletives during live broadcast. The Court had heard oral arguments [JURIST report] in the case in January.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Watch group criticizes lack of UN policy on use of private security firms
Dan Taglioli on July 11, 2012 3:15 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A non-profit United Nations [official website] watch group released a report last month criticizing the UN's lack of a comprehensive internal security policy in the face of its own increased reliance on private military and security companies (PMSCs). In producing Dangerous Partnership: Private Military & Security Companies and the UN [report, PDF] the Global Policy Forum [advocacy website; press release] analyzed available data to reveal that the UN has dramatically increased its reliance on PMSCs [BBC report] in recent years. The report claims that it "is impossible to get a full picture of which companies the UN has been using and how much it has been spending on their services." Regardless, the report states that the "UN's move to private security was not accompanied by necessary standard-setting." The report acknowledges that the Inter-Agency Security Management Network (IASMN) [official profile], a policy body composed of the heads of all security departments across the UN system, set up a Working Group to look into the matter in 2010. However, the report claims that "the details of the proposals remain private and the guidelines appear to be vague, offering only weak policy guidance. ... If adopted, these guidelines would probably do little to change the UN's use of PMSCs. The initiative might only deflect criticism and lessen pressure for more fundamental change." The report also notes that in May 2011 the UN Policy Committee discussed the matter of private security and submitted its conclusions to the Secretary-General [official website] the following month, but a year has since passed without public comment.

The ongoing conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan over the last decade and the withdrawal of occupying forces in recent years have drawn public attention to the combat zone roles of PMSCs, typified by infamous firms such as Blackwater [JURIST news archives], now known as Academi [corporate website]. In January Academi reached a confidential settlement agreement with survivors and families of victims in a 2007 shooting incident [JURIST report] in the Nisour Square area of Baghdad that left 17 Iraqi civilians dead. Two ex-Blackwater contractors were convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to two-and-a-half years in prison [JURIST reports] last year for their role in the shooting deaths of two Afghan nationals and the wounding of a third. In April a federal grand jury indicted five former Blackwater executives [JURIST report] on charges of weapons violations and lying to investigators. In 2010 the Iraqi government ordered 250 former Blackwater employees to leave Iraq in reaction to the dismissal of criminal charges [JURIST reports] against the guards involved in the 2007 shooting incident. The same month, the Department of Justice [official website] also opened an investigation [JURIST report] into whether Blackwater bribed the Iraqi government to be permitted to continue operating in Iraq following the 2007 shootings. Blackwater ceased operations in Baghdad [JURIST report] in May 2009 when its security contracts expired and were not renewed.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Microsoft, Motorola agree to suspend patent disputes pending licensing trial
Rebecca DiLeonardo on July 11, 2012 2:39 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Microsoft Inc. and Motorola [corporate websites] on Tuesday filed a joint motion in the US District Court for the Western District of Washington [official website] asking the court to suspend three patent cases between the parties until a trial is held on a licensing disagreement. Microsoft filed suit against Motorola, which is now owned by Google [corporate website] in 2010, complaining that Motorola failed to license them certain video and Wi-Fi technology on reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) terms. The companies asked the court [IDG News Service report] to suspend patent disputes until the completion of the RAND case, including a possible appeal, so that the two can focus their legal resources on one issue.

In May, the US International Trade Commission (ITC) concluded its investigation [JURIST report] into a complaint that a number of Motorola mobile phones infringed on several Microsoft patents. The decision affirmed the ruling of an administrative law judge in December that Microsoft had proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Motorola had in fact violated one of the several patents allegedly infringed. The decision can be appealed in federal court. In March, Microsoft announced that it would file a formal complaint [JURIST report] with the European Commission (EC) detailing alleged anticompetitive practices by Google.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Ivory Coast charges two more ex-president allies with genocide
Dan Taglioli on July 11, 2012 2:14 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Ivory Coast [BBC News backgrounder; JURIST news archive] justice ministry announced Tuesday that two allies of former president Laurent Gbagbo [BBC profile; JURIST news archive] have been charged with genocide relating to the months of post-election violence that followed Gbagbo's refusal to step down after his defeat in the November 2010 elections. Genevieve Bro-Grebe, leader of the pro-Gbagbo Women Patriots, and Abou Drahamane Sangare, former vice president of the Ivorian Popular Front (FPI), were reportedly named in two new indictments [AFP report] charging genocide and crimes against the civilian population. The new charges mean a total of eight Gbagbo loyalists now face "genocide" accusations [AP report], including former first lady Simone Gbagbo, ex-FPI head Pascal Affi N'Guessan and former prime minister Gilbert Ake N'Gbo. Gbagbo's rival President Alassane Ouattara [BBC profile; JURIST news archive] was declared the winner of the 2010 election and is now president. The violence that followed the election claimed approximately 3,000 lives.

Gbagbo was forced out and captured [JURIST report] last April. In November he was surrendered [JURIST report] to the International Criminal Court (ICC) [official website] by the national authorities of the Ivory Coast and brought to the Netherlands in response to an ICC arrest warrant [text, PDF] charging Gbagbo with four counts including murder, persecution, inhumane acts, and rape and other forms of sexual violence allegedly committed during the post-election violence. Last month the ICC postponed Gbagbo's confirmation of charges hearing after his lawyers asked the court more time to prepare [JURIST reports]. Gbagbo's lawyers complained that they did not have enough resources to build their case in the amount of time given. Gbagbo's original hearing date was set [JURIST report] in December during his pre-trial hearing in the Pre-Trial Chamber III of the ICC.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Malaysia PM plans to repeal sedition act
Sung Un Kim on July 11, 2012 2:11 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak [official website] on Wednesday announced plans to replace the 1948 Sedition Act [text, PDF] with the new National Harmony Act. The prime minister stated [NST report] that the new act will ensure the protection of the right to freedom of speech while balancing national unity and preventing hatred based on different religious views. The sedition act that was in place since colonial times has been constantly criticized for infringing free expression, but some opponents claim that the new law will not improve matters. In response, Razak stated that the new law is more specific in language and nature, regulating only that speech related to sensitive areas having the potential to endanger national solidarity.

Malaysia has taken measures to repeal and replace old colonial laws with new ones. In April, the lower chamber of the Malaysian Parliament [official website, in Malay] passed a law [JURIST report] that will replace the Internal Security Act of 1960 (ISA) [text, PDF; HRW backgrounder] that allows indefinite detention of terror suspects, dissidents and political opponents. A day earlier, the prime minister had pledged to review the ISA after the country's parliament announced [JURIST reports] that it was considering repealing and replacing the controversial law. The new act, the Security Offenses Act, requires detainees to be released or brought to court within 28 days in custody thereby significantly limiting the time period terror suspects have to serve in custody. Razak originally announced [JURIST report] that the government would repeal the ISA and the Banishment Act of 1959 [text] in September and initiated [JURIST report] the plan in October.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Case against Hariri assassins to proceed in absentia: Lebanon tribunal
Sung Un Kim on July 11, 2012 1:23 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Trial Chamber of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) [official website] on Wednesday upheld [decision, PDF] the decision to try four accused assassins of former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri [BBC profile; JURIST news archive] in absentia. The Chamber rejected the defense motion [motion, PDF] that challenged the legality and jurisdiction of the Tribunal over the case. The defense counsel, representing the four accused: Salim Ayyash, Mustafa Badreddine, Hussein Oneissi and Assad Sabra [STL profiles], asked the Chamber to suspend or reconsider in absentia proceedings by arguing that they would violate the human rights of the accused and are contrary to international law. The Chamber disagreed with the defense counsel that the February decision [decision, PDF] was discretionary, holding that "once the Trial Chamber had exercised its discretionary fact-finding powers to find that pre-conditions set out in Rule 106 (A)(iii) were met, it had no discretion to refuse to order a trial in absentia." The Chamber expressed that it could not find any error of legal reasoning in the February decision that could lead to unjust treatment of the four accused. The four alleged assassins remain at large.

In February, the STL granted [JURIST report] the prosecution's office permission to proceed with the case against the four accused assassins of Hariri. The four members of the Hezbollah [CFR backgrounder] have been accused of being involved in a February 2005 truck bombing that killed Hariri along with 20 others. The court reasoned that the prosecution and the national authorities have undertaken all reasonable steps to apprehend and inform the accused. Last August, the STL announced [JURIST report] that it would investigate three additional bombings that is believed to be connected to the February 2005 bomb attack. Two days earlier, the UN-backed tribunal unsealed [JURIST report] the indictment [text] against the assassins of Hariri after a pre-trial judge confirmed the indictment and ordered the lift of confidentiality. In June, the STL released [JURIST report] the indictment along with an arrest warrant against the accused to local authorities.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


HRW report: Migrants in Greece face violence, discrimination
Rebecca DiLeonardo on July 11, 2012 1:15 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Migrants residing in Greece face a rising culture of discrimination and violence, Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] said in a report [text, PDF; press release] on Wednesday. The report, entitled "Hate on the Streets: Xenophobic Violence in Greece," documents instances of abuse and discrimination against migrants who traveled Greece seeking refuge from war-torn homelands. The report notes that police frequently fail to investigate instances of violence against migrants, and migrants who report incidents are sometimes told they will be arrested if they pursue charges. Migrants living in Athens told HRW that parts of the city are too dangerous to travel through at night due to risk of attack. The report noted that there have been no convictions under Greece's hate crime statute since it's adoption in 2008. HRW recommended that Greek authorities condemn violence against migrants and immediately investigate reported attacks. The group also recommended that law enforcement adopt comprehensive policies to prevent and respond to violence and hate crimes in the country.

Laws and policies governing the treatment of migrants continue to raise international human rights concerns. Last month, Amnesty International (AI) said the Cyprus government's practice of detaining all illegal migrants seeking asylum in the island nation violates international law [JURIST report]. In January, the Israeli Knesset passed a bill that imposes harsher penalties on illegal migrants [JURIST report] in Israel, as well as on Israelis who help illegal migrants. AI criticized the bill as a violation of human rights. Last March, AI released a report documenting discrimination and human rights violations against Roma migrants [JURIST report] in Slovenia and urging the Slovenian government to protect Roma communities. In September 2010, the Global Migration Group (GMG) adopted a statement urging all governments to respect the human rights of migrants [JURIST report], who are more likely to face various forms of abuse as they lack proper legal status. The GMG stressed that every person, regardless of migration status, should enjoy the fundamental rights to life, liberty and all fundamental human rights.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


US House members file court brief arguing DOMA unconstitutional
Dan Taglioli on July 11, 2012 1:02 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Members of the US House of Representatives [official website] on Tuesday filed an amicus brief [text, PDF] with the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] regarding the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) [text, PDF; JURIST news archive], which denies federal recognition of same-sex marriages [JURIST backgrounder]. The brief was submitted by 132 House members, including House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) [official website; press release], in the appeal of Karen Golinski v. Office of Personnel Management, the landmark case in which the US District Court for the Northern District of California [official website] ruled that DOMA is unconstitutional [JURIST report]. In his decision, Judge Jeffrey White held that statutory classifications based on sexual orientation should be subject to heightened judicial scrutiny and that DOMA is invalid as not being "substantially related to an important governmental objective." The House members' brief strongly supports the February ruling:
Section 3 of DOMA, which defines marriage for all federal purposes as "only a legal union between one man and one woman," lacks a rational relationship to any legitimate federal purpose and accordingly is unconstitutional. ... Amici agree with the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the District Court that laws like DOMA that disadvantage lesbians and gay men warrant heightened judicial review, and that DOMA cannot survive such review. ... [Regardless,] the Fifth Amendment's equal protection guarantee [Cornell LII backgrounder] renders Section 3 invalid under any judicial standard.
The crux of the brief is that the House is "not united on DOMA's validity" and that Section 3 does not affect married heterosexual couples but "affirmatively harms married gay and lesbian couples and their children."

Last month 10 US senators filed their own amicus brief in the case, arguing in the opposite [JURIST report] that the federal government had a legitimate interest in creating a uniform federal definition of marriage to "[avoid] massive legal uncertainty." That filing came the week after the House Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) submitted its brief defending DOMA [JURIST report], arguing that laws relating to sexual orientation should be evaluated with a rational basis [Cornell LII backgrounder] test and that the government's denial of federal benefits to lawfully married same-sex couples is a rational means to preserving a single federal definition of marriage and preserving federal funds. The BLAG DOMA defense group of attorneys [JURIST report] was established by House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) [official website] on a 3-2 BLAG vote in March of last year after the DOJ announced that it would no longer defend the constitutionality of Section 3 on order from President Obama, after he announced he would continue to fight for the repeal of DOMA [JURIST report]. In March of this year the Obama administration petitioned the Ninth Circuit [JURIST report] for an expedited en banc review of the Golinski case.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


UN urged to extend mission to Syria
Rebecca DiLeonardo on July 11, 2012 12:40 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Amnesty International (AI) and three other rights groups on Wednesday urged [letter, PDF; press release] the UN Security Council to renew the UN Supervision Mission in Syria (UNSMIS) [official website], which is scheduled to end on July 20. In an open letter to the Security Council, the rights groups said that human rights abuses in the country are on the rise and that the UN must continue to pressure the government to improve humanitarian conditions. The letter urged that an independent organization was necessary to monitor the deteriorating situation in the country where violent clashes between government forces and armed opposition groups:
In the Syrian situation, where each party to the conflict is increasingly accusing the other of human rights violations and using these accusations as justification for further violence, an independent observer force such as UNSMIS is crucial for diffusing tension and countering the dissemination of false information. The potential of UNSMIS's role in this context was seen in the aftermath of the massacre in Al-Houla, when UNSMIS's observations served as a credible source of information for the international community, bypassing contradictory reports and escalating accusations from either party of the conflict.
The groups further asked that the Security Council give greater authority to the UNSMIS in its renewal resolution, noting that the current UNSMIS has had trouble gaining access to problem areas of the country. The letter was also signed by the Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS), the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy websites].

UN Chief Military Observer in Syria Major-General Robert Mood last week stated that he believed Syrian authorities were committed to implementing the peace agreement [JURIST report] that was reached earlier this month. Mood, who works with the UNSMIS, confirmed that the UN would continue to provide humanitarian support as the violence subsides, even if the UNSMIS mission is not renewed. In June, the UNSMIS concluded [JURIST report] in a report that Syrian forces "may have been responsible" for the killing of more than 100 civilians [JURIST report] in Al-Houla in May. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, however, said earlier this month that the government had nothing to do with it [JURIST report] and that "not even monsters" would carry out those attacks. In April the UN Security Council approved a resolution [JURIST report] to send 300 unarmed soldiers and other humanitarian aid to supervise the implementation of a peace plan. This came after Human Rights Watch (HRW) released a report [JURIST report] stating that Syrian security forces had killed more than 100 civilians and opposition fighters in recent attacks. In March, HRW also reported on and linked to videos of Syrian forces rounding up civilians [JURIST report], including women and children, and forcing them to walk in front of soldiers and tanks during troop movements and attacks so that opposition fighters would not shoot at them.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Journalist rights group concerned about press freedom in Maldives
Rebecca DiLeonardo on July 11, 2012 11:52 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) [advocacy website] on Wednesday said [press release] that press freedom in the Maldives has been deteriorating since the resignation of former president Mohamed Nasheed. Nasheed, who was the first democratically elected presdient of the Maldives, has claimed that he was forced from office in a coup, but current President Mohamed Waheed Hassan [official profile] has denied these allegations. CPR said that under Hassan's presidency, journalists in the Maldives have been subject to police brutality and attacks by political extremists. The group called on Hassan to ensure the safety of journalists in the country, saying, "President Hassan must ensure that journalists are free to report if he wishes to distance himself from [the former dictatorship] and stabilize the nation for elections." Elections are scheduled to take place in the country next year.

Protection of free expression remains a key concern for international human rights advocates. Earlier this month, Human Rights Watch (HRW) urged the government of Sri Lanka to end arrests and office raids of journalists [JURIST report] who publish content critical of the government. In June, two reports were presented to the UN Human Rights Council urging greater protection for the right to life of journalists [JURIST report] and media freedom. The CPJ in February released its annual Attacks on the Press report [JURIST report], expressing concern about increased censorship of journalists worldwide in 2011. The CPJ criticized the growing trend of government censorship, especially Internet censorship. Last May, journalism rights group Reporters without Borders (RSF) released [JURIST report] its annual list of predators of press freedom, which included the heads of state of several countries in the Middle East and North Africa. In April 2011, the US Department of State (DOS) released [JURIST report] its 2010 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, listing many of the same offenders of free press as the RSF report.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Bin Laden associate released from Guantanamo prison
Dan Taglioli on July 11, 2012 11:34 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A confirmed al Qaeda member and Osama bin Laden [JURIST news archives] associate was released [DOD press release] from Guantanamo Bay [JURIST backgrounder] and returned to his native Sudan on Wednesday after more than a decade of detention. Ibrahim Ahmed Mahmoud al Qosi [DOD materials; JURIST news archive], 50, was released under the terms of a 2010 plea arrangement [JURIST report] in which he admitted to supporting al Qaeda since 1996 in their hostilities against the US, acting as the terrorist group's cook and accountant in the 1990s and as a bodyguard for Osama bin Laden in later years. Al Qosi was also accused of being Bin Laden's driver and helping him escape to the mountains of Afghanistan after the US invasion in 2001. Al Qosi is well known as the first Guantanamo detainee to be tried by military tribunal under revised rules [AFP report] introduced by the administration of President Barack Obama. His original 14-year sentence was reduced as a result of the plea arrangement in 2010, and al Qosi reportedly arrived in Khartoum via US military aircraft early Wednesday morning. The US imposed sanctions on Sudan in 1997, partly for its support of international terrorism.

Al Qosi was detained at Guantanamo since he was transferred there from Afghanistan in 2002. In 2010 Andrea Prasow, senior counter-terrorism counsel at Human Rights Watch [advocacy website], used the al Qosi trial to point out flaws in the military commission system [JURIST op-ed], writing that the players constituting the tribunal that tried al Qosi in Guantanamo had created their own "mini-justice system" to replace the broken system they had originally been handed. In December 2009 a military judge ruled that the US government could partially amend the charges [JURIST report] against al Qosi by changing his jurisdictional basis but could not include four additional years of alleged activities under the charges. In October of that year military judges granted continuances [JURIST report] for prosecutors in the case.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Pakistan lawmakers approve bill to shield PM from contempt proceedings
Sung Un Kim on July 11, 2012 11:15 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The National Assembly of Pakistan [official website] on Monday approved a bill that would shield senior officials from contempt of court proceedings. The move by the lower house of the country's parliament is seen as an attempt to exempt the new prime minister Raja Pervez Ashraf [BBC profile] from a possible upcoming contempt of court proceeding for failure to reopen the investigation against President Asif Ali Zardari [official website]. Upon passing the bill, some have criticized the new legislation because it has no other purpose other than protecting the new prime minister. Others, including Ashraf, argued that the new bill neither strips away the power of the judiciary nor interferes with anyone pursuing their responsibilities. Rather, the bill aids in clarifying the confusion underlying the power of the country's Supreme Court. The Supreme Court of Pakistan [official website] had ordered [JURIST report] the new prime minister in late June to investigate into the corruption allegations against the president. Ashraf has argued that president is immune from prosecution under the country's constitution. The court in response claimed that no one is above the law and thus, the investigation against the president should proceed. It gave the prime minister until Thursday to act on its order. The bill is expected to be presented to the Senate [official website], the upper house of the parliament, before the president signs it.

The country's judiciary has been in conflict with the executive branch since political leaders have rejected the court's order to investigate into the president's alleged corruption practices. In June a Pakistani court ordered [JURIST report] the arrest of Makhdoom Shahabuddin [BBC profile], a former health minister from Punjab Province and the nominee for the country's then-vacant prime minister position for allegations that he was involved in irregularities in the amount of the controlled drug Ephedrine circulating within the country during his tenure as health minister. The arrest order was issued the same day the president nominated Shahabuddin to fill the position of former prime minister Gilani who was disqualified two days earlier from being a member of Parliament since his April contempt conviction [JURIST reports]. He was convicted of contempt because he refused to open an investigation against the president.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Rights groups urge Sudan government to end abuse of protesters
Rebecca DiLeonardo on July 11, 2012 11:14 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Amnesty International (AI) and Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy websites] came together on Wednesday to urge the Sudanese government [press release] to end the detention and abuse of protesters in Sudan. In a press release, the two groups estimated that Sudanese security forces have detained more than 2,000 peaceful protesters since June. The groups said that the majority of the detainees are being held by the Sudanese National Security Service (NSS), noting a 2010 AI report [text, PDF; JURIST report] documenting widespread abuses within that organization. AI and HRW called on Sudanese authorities to stop arresting peaceful protesters and to immediately end the abuse of detainees, saying "Torture and other ill-treatment are absolutely prohibited under international law." The statement urged Sudan to investigate allegations of excessive force and torture and prosecute those who are found to have participated in these activities.

Government abuses and violent conflict in Sudan have raised international concern recently. The UN Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs Valerie Amos on Friday expressed concern [JURIST report] about deteriorating conditions in Sudan due to continued violent conflict in the country. Amos noted a recent increase in Sudanese refugees crossing into neighboring countries because of the conflict. In June UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay urged Sudan authorities [JURIST report] to take measures to prevent violence against protesters in upcoming demonstrations. Earlier that month AI urged Sudanese authorities to cease violence against protesters and journalists [JURIST report]. The call came after the country's police in Khartoum used tear gas and batons against civilians who protested over austerity cuts.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Thailand monarch pardons US citizen on defamation charge
Dan Taglioli on July 11, 2012 10:43 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A US citizen was released from a Thai prison Tuesday on a royal pardon that commuted a two-and-a-half-year sentence for defaming the Thai royal family. Thai-born Joe Gordon (Thai name Lerpong Wichaikhammat), 55, is a Colorado used-car salesman who was arrested [BBC report] last May while vacationing in Thailand because several years earlier he had translated and posted online excerpts of a locally banned biography of King Bhumibol Adulyadej. Gordon pleaded guilty to violating Section 112 of the Thai Penal Code [text], the lese majeste law: "Whoever, defames, insults or threatens the King, the Queen, the Heir-apparent or the Regent, shall be punished with imprisonment of three to fifteen years." Gordon had translated into Thai and then posted excerpts of the biography, The King Never Smiles by Paul Handley, on a blog while living in the US. The original sentence was for five years imprisonment, but judges halved the term after Gordon pleaded guilty. Bhumibol, 84, is the world's longest-reigning monarch and sitting head of state. The US has pushed Thai authorities for Gordon's release [Al Jazeera report] since his arrest last year, but no official reason for the royal pardon has been put forth.

Gordon was sentenced in December [JURIST report] after pleading guilty in October. UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression Frank La Rue [official website] recently condemned the lese majeste law [JURIST report] shortly after the guilty plea was submitted: "The threat of a long prison sentence and vagueness of what kinds of expression constitute defamation, insult, or threat to the monarchy, encourage self-censorship and stifle important debates on matters of public interest, thus putting in jeopardy the right to freedom of opinion and expression. ... This is exacerbated by the fact that the charges can be brought by private individuals and trials are often closed to the public." In 2009 Amnesty International (AI) [advocacy website] called for a public trial [JURIST report] for a Thai political activist accused of lese majeste. In 2009 a Thai court sentenced an anti-coup protestor to 18 years in prison. Shortly afterward Awzar Thi, a member of the Asian Human Rights Commission in Hong Kong, wrote that in enforcing the law the Thailand judiciary was discrediting itself [JURIST comment] "in its hurry to defend increasingly outdated social arrangements."




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Russia parliament adopts controversial Internet regulation bill
Rebecca DiLeonardo on July 11, 2012 10:41 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Russian State Duma [official website, in Russian] on Wednesday approved [session minutes, in Russian] the third reading of a controversial Internet regulation bill. The bill, which gives the Russian government the ability to completely block access to certain websites, is described by its authors as a means of protecting children from harmful content. Opponents fear, however, that the government will use the law to silence opposition speech. The legislation was overwhelmingly approved [AFP report] by the lawmakers with little debate and must now be signed by the president. The Russian version of the online encyclopedia Wikipedia [website] on Tuesday shut down its site [JURIST report] in a one-day protest of the legislation. The closed version of Wikipedia redirected users to a page that read, "imagine a world without free knowledge." The page also contained a link to the site's article on the Russian bill, which it says "may become the basis for real censorship on the internet."

Internet Freedom remains a controversial issue around the world. The UN Human Rights Council last week passed its first-ever resolution to protect the free speech [JURIST report] of individuals online. The resolution was approved by all 47 members of the council, including China and Cuba, which have been criticized for limiting Internet freedom. Last month the Chinese Ministry of Information and Technology revealed its proposed changes to Chinese Internet law [JURIST report] that seek to limit the ability of users to post anonymous comments on micro-blogs and forums. A Bangkok criminal court in May sentenced [JURIST report] Chiranuch Premchaiporn, webmaster of independent Internet news site Prachatai, to an eight-month suspended sentence for failing to delete defamatory comments against Thailand's royal family. Earlier that month, a Dutch court ordered [JURIST report] Internet service providers in the Netherlands to block the file-sharing website The Pirate Bay or else pay a fine of USD $12,750 per day.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Maryland board of elections approves same-sex marriage repeal for ballot
Rebecca DiLeonardo on July 11, 2012 9:50 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Maryland Board of Elections [official website] on Tuesday officially certified [certification notice, PDF] a referendum petition seeking to challenge the state's new same-sex marriage law [SB 241, PDF] in the upcoming election. In a letter, the Board of Elections stated that the office had confirmed 122,481 signatures in support of the petition, a count that is well over the requirement of just over 55,000. The petition was organized by the Maryland Marriage Alliance [advocacy website], an advocacy group that opposes same-sex marriage [JURIST backgrounder]. An unofficial count [JURIST report] of certified signatures early last month indicated that the petition had already satisfied the requirement. Maryland joined the seven states that allow same-sex marriage [JURIST report] in March when Governor Martin O'Malley [official website] signed the Civil Marriage Protection Act.

Several states will include a same-sex marriage question on their ballot in the upcoming election. Minnesota voters will have the opportunity to amend the state constitutionin November , defining marriage as a heterosexual relationship. On Monday, proponents of the ballot initiative petitioned the state Supreme Court to restore the original title of the proposed amendment [JURIST report], arguing that its amended title is misleading. Last month, citizens in Washington obtained enough signatures [JURIST report] to challenge newly passed same-sex marriage legislation. The state's ballot will contain a section asking voters to accept or reject the new legislation. Similarly, a group supporting same-sex marriage in Maine achieved enough signatures [JURIST report] in February to have the question of same-sex marriage appear on its ballot. Earlier that month, New Jersey governor Chris Christie vetoed legislation [JURIST report] that would have legalized same-sex marriage in the state, and called for a state-wide referendum on the issue.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Romania court: majority of electorate must turn out for vote to remove president
Michael Haggerson on July 11, 2012 7:52 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Constitutional Court of Romania [official website, in Romanian] stated on Tuesday that at least 50 percent of the electorate must turn out for the July 29 national referendum to decide whether President Traian Basescu [official website, in Romania] should be ousted from the presidency. If less than 50 percent of the electorate turns out for the referendum, then the vote to remove the president will not be valid. This decision is seen as a boon to Basescu's supporters because having 50 percent of Romanian voters turn out for the referendum is not guaranteed [AP report]. The Romanian Parliament [official website] voted to impeach [JURIST report] Basescu on Friday, and the Constitutional Court of Romania approved [JURIST report] the suspension on Monday. There has been a continuing power struggle between Basescu's supporters and the supporters of Prime Minister Victor Ponta [BBC profile] since Ponta came to power. European Union [official website] officials have expressed concern [press release] with the speed with which the Constitutional Court confirmed Basescu's suspension of, stating that it may threaten democratic checks and balances and the independence of the judiciary. Ponta is expected to meet with Jose Manuel Barroso [official website], President of the European Commission [official website], to discuss the matter on Thursday.

Last week, the Constitutional Court also accused Ponta of overstepping his authority [JURIST report] by attempting to seize control over the judiciary system. The court announced that it has alerted the European authorities [Reuters report] of the situation. Also last week Ponta ignored a decision by the court finding Basescu should be the representative of the country at the European Council [official website] meeting in Brussels. In 2009 the Constitutional Court declared incumbent president Basescu winner of the country's disputed presidential election [JURIST report]. Basescu, who has been president of Romania since 2004, has survived impeachment once before. In 2007 Basescu was reinstated after the high court certified the results of a referendum in which 74 percent of voters rejected Basescu's impeachment [JURIST report].




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST OP-ED

In Alabama, "Back Door" Restrictions on Abortion and Roe
DOMESTIC
LaJuana Davis
Cumberland School of Law

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

SYNDICATION

Add Paper Chase legal news to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to Paper Chase by e-mail. JURIST offers a free once-a-day digest [sample]. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.


R|mail e-mails individual Paper Chase posts through the day. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.

PUBLICATION

Join top US law schools, federal appeals courts, law firms and legal organizations by publishing Paper Chase legal news on your public website or intranet.

JURIST offers a news ticker and preformatted headline boxes updated in real time. Get the code.

Feedroll provides free Paper Chase news boxes with headlines or digests precisely tailored to your website's look and feel, with content updated every 15 minutes. Customize and get the code.

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org