 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, June 26, 2012 |
 |
|


Senate committee approves bill to sanction Russia officials linked to lawyer's death
Rebecca DiLeonardo on June 26, 2012 4:08 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Senate Foreign Relations Committee [official website] on Tuesday unanimously approved a bill [S 1039 text] that would impose sanctions on Russian officials linked to the 2009 death of Russian lawyer Sergei Magnitsky [JURIST news archive]. The bill was approved [JURIST report] by a House committee earlier this month. If passed, the bill will bar the US State Department [official website] from issuing visas to Russian officials connected with Magnitsky's death and will impose other sanctions, including making public the names of suspected officials and banning them from banking in the US. A private investigative report issued in November 2011 detailed the denial of medical treatment [JURIST report] to and severe physical abuse of Magnitsky, a former Russian lawyer and purported whistle-blower. He died [JURIST report] in a Moscow prison in November 2009. Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev admitted in 2011 that Magnitsky's death was the result of criminal acts, differing from his previous explanation which had blamed prison doctors. Russian President Vladimir Putin [official website, in Russian] has said the Russian government will retaliate [Reuters report] if the bill is passed.
Prior to his death, Magnitsky was held in prison for 358 days with little to no access to legal representation, his family or medical professionals. In a controversial move last August, Russian investigators reopened the case [JURIST report] against Magnitsky on the basis of a new ruling permitting criminal cases against the dead. Critics of this action, such as JURIST Contributing Editor David Crane, argue that the ongoing posthumous prosecution of Magnitsky is a violation of the rule of law [JURIST op-ed] and an embarrassment for the Russian judicial system. Last year, US lawmakers introduced the bill [JURIST report] to sanction individuals who are connected to Magnitsky's death.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bahrain government to compensate families for protester deaths
Rebecca DiLeonardo on June 26, 2012 3:37 PM ET

[JURIST] The Bahrain government on Tuesday announced that it would pay $2.6 million in restitution to the families of protesters killed in pro-democracy protests last year. The government said that the compensation was to comply with the recommendations [Reuters report] of the Bahrain Independent Commission of Inquiry (BICI) [official website], which suggested in its report [JURIST report] last year that the government "compensate and provide remedies for the families of the deceased victims in a manner that is commensurate with the gravity of their loss." The government reported that each person would receive approximately $153,000, but no list of families was released. The report, issued in November 2011, concluded that Bahrain authorities had used excessive force and tortured detainees involved in the pro-democracy demonstrations earlier that year. The report also recommended that the government compensate victims of torture and ill-treatment.
In April Amnesty International (AI) [advocacy website] criticized Bahrain [JURIST report] for continued human rights violations, noting that Bahrain's reform efforts following the BICI report had failed to alleviate human rights abuses in the country. In November Bahraini King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa ordered a special commission [JURIST report] to investigate the BICI report which concluded that Bahraini authorities used excessive force and to make recommendations. The Bahrain government admitted the use of excessive force [JURIST report] in the protests. This admission, which was made in anticipation of the independent BICI report, was a reversal of the government's previous defense of its actions [CNN report] during the protests. In June, Khalifa announced that an independent commission would investigate human rights violations [JURIST report] related to the pro-democracy protests.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UN rights expert urges focus on victims of human trafficking
Sung Un Kim on June 26, 2012 3:15 PM ET

[JURIST] The UN Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons [official website], especially women and children, Joy Ngozi Ezeilo [official profile] on Tuesday urged [press release] the international community to focus on the human rights of trafficked individuals when criminalizing and prosecuting human trafficking. Ezeilo noted in her report [text, PDF] that criminalization of trafficking is not the end itself, but an effective prosecution of such offenses should be implemented. Criminal justice and victim support agencies should work closely together to make the anti-trafficking effort more effective. The Special Rapporteur also provided recommendations of how penalties should be imposed on trafficking perpetrators. According to her, an effective penalty would be "proportionate to the offence committed, and proceeds from the crime should be confiscated." States were cautioned about unintentional detrimental effects laws and regulations may have on trafficked individuals, such as involuntary detentions based on protective measures.
Last week, the European Commission [official website] announced that it plans to end human trafficking in Europe [JURIST report]. The commission identified poverty, gender inequality and social unrest as key factors leading to risk of human trafficking. The 40-point plan is going to be implemented during the next five years by the member states with the purpose of achieving the five main goals of 1) identifying, protecting and assisting victims of trafficking; 2) stepping up the prevention of trafficking in human beings; 3) increased prosecution of traffickers; 4) enhanced coordination and cooperation among key actors and policy coherence and 5) increased knowledge of and effective response to emerging concerns related to all forms of trafficking in human beings. In April, the UN urged [JURIST report] the international community to increase its effort to stop human trafficking. It was estimated that at least 2.4 million individuals could be victims of human trafficking at any given moment. Last August, Thailand was called to improve its measures to combat human trafficking including sexual and labor exploitation especially of children.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal appeals court rules for EPA on greenhouse gas emissions
Sung Un Kim on June 26, 2012 2:21 PM ET

[JURIST] The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit [official website] on Tuesday upheld [opinion, PDF] the findings of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [official website] that heat-trapping pollutants such as carbon dioxide are endangering the public health and welfare. The court reviewed four rules: the Endangerment Finding [text, PDF], the Tailpipe Rule [materials], the Timing Rule and the Tailoring Rule [texts, PDF]. It unanimously held that "1) the Endangerment Finding and Tailpipe Rule are neither arbitrary nor capricious; 2) EPA's interpretation of the governing CAA provisions is unambiguously correct; and 3) no petitioner has standing to challenge the Timing and Tailoring Rules." The findings at issue laid out the foundations for EPA's new restriction of greenhouse gas emissions placed on car models build in 2012 and on new regulations on permits for power plants and factories. The 82-page ruling was criticized by industry leaders and politicians who claim that Tuesday's holding will impose heavy burden on the industries, resulting in possible economic stagnation.
The EPA has been granted [JURIST report] authority under the Clean Air Act (CAA) [official website; EPA backgrounder] to regulate the emission of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, by automobiles. In Massachusetts v. EPA [Duke Law case backgrounder; JURIST report], 12 states and several environmental groups sued the EPA arguing that the agency had "abdicated its responsibility under the Clean Air Act" to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. The court held that greenhouse gas was within the CAA's definition of "air pollutant" and thus, the EPA had statutory authority to take control the emission of such gases from new motor vehicles.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Arizona governor: enforcement of immigration law will not violate Constitution
Rebecca DiLeonardo on June 26, 2012 1:48 PM ET

[JURIST] Arizona Governor Jan Brewer [official website] said [press release] Monday she is pleased with the US Supreme Court's decision upholding the a controversial section of Arizona's immigration law [SB 1070, PDF; JURIST news archive] and that she is confident future enforcement will not violate the Constitution. The decision in Arizona v. United States [SCOTUSblog backgrounder; JURIST report], while striking down three sections of the law, upheld section 2(b) which requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest and allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant. The case examined the sole issue of whether the provision was preempted by federal law, and the court noted that its decision did not bar challenges based on other constitutional issues. In a statement, Brewer said she was confident that enforcement of the law would not violate the constitution:We know the eyes of the world will be upon us. We know critics will be watching and waiting, hoping for another opportunity to continue their legal assault against our State. But I have faith in our law enforcement. Our brave men and women in uniform have been trained so that they are able to enforce this law efficiently, effectively and in harmony with the Constitution. The controversial law, however, already faces civil rights challenges. Earlier this month, a group of Arizona residents argued [JURIST report] before a federal judge for class-action status in a lawsuit challenging the law. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) [official website] on Monday announced [press release] that it had raised nearly $9 million to "[fight] the 'corrosive effects' of existing anti-immigrant laws in Arizona." US Attorney General Eric Holder [official profile] said [press release] Monday he "remain[s] concerned about the impact of Section 2[b]," noting that it is "not a license to engage in racial profiling."
In upholding section 2(B), the Supreme Court found that the section can be construed as a constitutional exercise of state authority, and that "it would be inappropriate to assume 2(B) will be construed in a way that creates a conflict with federal law." The court noted, however, that this decision does not bar other actions against 2(B) and other parts of the law based on different constitutional issues. The court heard final oral arguments [JURIST report] for the case in late April. The key issue was whether certain provisions of the Arizona law intruded in areas reserved by the Constitution for federal regulation. The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case in December after Arizona asked the high court to weigh in [JURIST reports] on the issue. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld an injunction last April before the law ever took effect, and the US Department of Justice [official website] urged the Supreme Court not to hear the appeal [JURIST report].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Serbia court sentences 14 individuals for war crimes
Sung Un Kim on June 26, 2012 1:29 PM ET

[JURIST] The War Crimes Chamber of the Belgrade District Court on Tuesday sentenced 14 former members of the Yugoslav army and paramilitaries for killing non-Serb civilians during the Serbo-Croatian War [GlobalSecurity backgrounder] in which around 20,000 people lost their lives. The court found [B92 report] that the prosecution had presented evidence proving beyond reasonable doubt that the 14 individuals were guilty of killing 70 Croat civilians during November and December 1991. The court sentenced Ljuban Devetak to 20 years in prison and Mulan Radojcic to 13 years, while Milan Devcic and Zeljko Krnjajic each received a 10-year sentences. Former member of the Yugoslav Army Miodrag Dimitrijevic was also sentenced to 10 years in prison while Darko Peric and Radovan Vlajkovic received five years each with Radisav Josipovic getting four years. Jovan Dimitrijevic and Zoran Kosijer, former paramilitaries were sentenced to eight and nine years, respectively. Petronije Stevanovic, Sasa Stojanovic and Dragan Bacic were sentenced to 14, eight and six years. Lastly, Aleksandar Nikolaidis received a six-year sentence. They were found guilty of compelling civilians to walk through mine fields and using them as human shields.
The International Criminal Tribune for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) [official website] has been working with Serbia to convict and sentence those responsible for the crimes committed during the 1991-95 war in Croatia. Completion of the ICTY is considered the final step before Serbia's accession to the European Union (EU) [official website]. Earlier this month, the ICTY closed its third contempt trial against former Serb nationalist politician and war crimes suspect Vojislav Seselj [official website, in Serbian; JURIST news archive] who has been accused of contempt of court and divulging data in a book he authored [website, in Serbian] disclosing names, occupations and residences of 11 protected witnesses. He was sentenced in October to 18 months in prison and in July 2009 to 15 months [JURIST reports]. A week earlier, the prosecution for the ICTY reported [JURIST report] the court's Completion Strategy to the UN Security Council [official website] addressing among others Serbia's failure to investigate and prosecute those who aided the fugitives. In July 2011, Serbian authorities arrested [JURIST report] Goran Hadzic [ICTY backgrounder], the last fugitive of the original 161 sought for war crimes by the ICTY.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Netherlands to appeal state liability for deaths of 3 Bosniaks at Srebrenica
Rebecca DiLeonardo on June 26, 2012 1:03 PM ET

[JURIST] The Netherlands plans to appeal a judgment finding its government liable for the death of three Bosnian Muslims (Bosiniaks) during the Srebrenica massacre [BBC timeline; JURIST news archive] and forcing it to compensate the men's families. The Hague Appeals Court [official website, in Dutch] last year ruled [judgment, in Dutch] that the Netherlands is liable [JURIST report] for the deaths of three Bosiniaks who took refuge in a UN-designated "safe area" controlled by the Dutch battalion (Dutchbat), during the invasion of Srebrenica by Ratko Mladic [ICTY backgrounder, PDF; JURIST news archive]. Dutchbat allegedly forced the refugees to leave the compound after which they were killed during the massacre. The court held that Dutchbat knew that men were being beaten and killed by the invading army and thus should reasonably have known that by forcing the men out of the compound it was putting them in grave danger. A spokesman for the government of the Netherlands said that they believed the area was effectively under UN control [AFP report] at the time of the incident.
Relatives of the victims filed the complaint [JURIST report] with the Dutch prosecutor's office in July 2010 alleging that three Dutch soldiers, operating as UN peacekeepers, were complicit in the commission of war crimes and genocide during the 1995 Srebrenica massacre. The complaint argued that the soldiers knew the victims would be killed if they were handed over to Serbian troops. Relatives of the victims of the Srebrenica massacre had previously sought justice for the actions of Dutch peacekeeping forces, which they say led to the massacre. In March, The Hague Appeals Court upheld [JURIST report] the UN's immunity from prosecution by rejecting claims [JURIST report] brought by relatives of victims of the massacre. The relatives, known as the Mothers of Srebrenica, alleged that the Netherlands should be liable for the deaths because Dutch soldiers operating under the UN flag negligently failed to protect civilians by forcing the victims out of "safe area" and turning them over to Bosnian Serbs. Ratko Mladic was arrested [JURIST report] in May and is currently on trial in the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) [official website] for charges of genocide and crimes against humanity. He was thrown out of his latest court appearance [JURIST report] earlier this week for causing a disruption and refusing to issue a plea.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

South Sudan urged to adopt plan to prevent future violence
Sung Un Kim on June 26, 2012 12:35 PM ET

[JURIST] The UN Mission in the Republic of South Sudan (UNMISS) [official website] on Monday urged South Sudan [BBC backgrounder; JURIST news archive] to adopt a plan to prevent further inter-communal violence [press release] in Jonglei State. The report [text, PDF] was completed based on information gathered through 20 field missions by UNMISS with the support of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) [official website]. The report revealed that there were 612 fatalities during the armed conflict between Lou Nuer and Murle ethnic groups between December 23 and January 4. Investigators found that the attacks targeted entire communities, including women and children. UNMISS called on the newly created government to ensure that its citizens will be free from conflicts based on ethnicity:While the causes of inter-communal violence in Jonglei State are complex, ranging from arms proliferation and insecurity to marginalisation and lack of development, it is imperative that the newly-independent State demonstrates its commitment to preventing further intercommunal attacks and protecting civilians from violence and abuse, regardless of their ethnic origin. Its success in creating a new state and national identity will greatly depend on its ability to overcome ethnically-driven conflict, and to safeguard the human rights of all its people and communities, including access to food, education and healthcare. UNMISS provided nine recommendations for the country to avoid similar violence and conflicts in the future. Among others, the country should develop a "comprehensive, multi-sectorial plan with short, medium and long-term actions to respond to the main causes of the violence in Jonglei State" while keep supporting the peace process that has already launched.
In February Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] had called on [JURIST report] South Sudan to investigate the ethnic conflict sparked by the attacks made on Murle villages and to prosecute those responsible for the violence. In December around 6,000 to 8,000 armed Lou Nuer youths calling themselves "White Army" invaded the Murle villages for 12 days, robbing and burning houses and killing thousands of people. In response, the Murles groups initiated retaliatory attacks on Lou Nuer and Bor Dinka areas which lasted until February 4. South Sudan is not only facing tension within its boundaries. In April the Sudanese government declared a state of emergency [JURIST report] on the South Sudan border after the arrest of four people whom the Sudanese claim were arrested for aggression against the north in the contested Heglig oil fields. During the same month, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay [official profile] called on [JURIST report] both Sudan [BBC backgrounder; JURIST news archive] and South Sudan to stop the violence that has caused fatalities on both sides. South Sudan was recognized as an independent state [JURIST report] in July 2011, making it the world's 193rd nation.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal judge blocks Florida law barring contracts for business tied to Cuba, Syria
Rebecca DiLeonardo on June 26, 2012 11:23 AM ET

[JURIST] A judge for the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida [official website] on Monday issued a temporary injunction blocking enforcement of a new Florida law [materials] that denies government contracts to companies that do business in Cuba or Syria. The law is currently facing a challenge [JURIST report] from Odebrecht Construction Inc. [corporate website, in Portuguese], a company that would be affected by the new legislation. The company argues that the law is an unconstitutional intrusion in the federal government's authority to regulate foreign affairs. In issuing the injunction, Judge K Michael Moore noted that laws like this have not survived in the past. The law, which was signed by Governor Rick Scott [official website] in early May, bars any company that is "engaged in business operations in Syria or Cuba" from bidding for government contracts and authorizes steep penalties for companies who fail to disclose ties to the countries. It was planned to take effect on July 1. Lawyers for Florida say the state has the authority to choose the businesses with which it contracts.
Cuba-US relations have improved in recent years. Last year US President Barack Obama [official profile] ordered [JURIST report] the Departments of State, Treasury and Homeland Security [official websites] to take steps to ease restrictions on travel and remittances to Cuba. The new regulations were expected to allow greater travel from the US to Cuba for religious and educational purposes, the transfer of up to $2000 per year to non-family members in Cuba so long as they are not senior government or Communist Party leaders, and all US international airports to service charter flights between the two countries. In 2009, Obama ordered the lifting of travel restrictions and restrictions on money transfers [JURIST report] between Cuban-Americans and their families in Cuba in 2009. Obama also ordered that US telecommunications companies be allowed to work within Cuba to facilitate communication between families split between the two countries. The plan was put forward as not only necessary for the interests of the families, but also as way to bolster a democratic movement within Cuba


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UN SG urges nations to cease torture against civilians
Sung Un Kim on June 26, 2012 10:41 AM ET

[JURIST] UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon [official profile] on Tuesday urged the international community to take measures to stop torture [official statement] by numerous states against their own citizens. Commemorating the International Day in Support of Victims of Torture [official website], Ban and other UN officials addressed the need for continued support to end inhumane practices in various places around the world. Ban noted that countries are still using torture and other inhumane practices against citizens in response to their legitimate demand for freedom and human rights. The secretary-general stated that states should not only find ways to cease such practices but should also implement measures to compensate victims:We also note the obligation of States not only to prevent torture but to provide all torture victims with effective and prompt redress, compensation and appropriate social, psychological, medical and other forms of rehabilitation. Both the General Assembly and the Human Rights Council have now strongly urged States to establish and support rehabilitation centres or facilities. The United Nations Voluntary Fund for Victims of Torture supports hundreds of organizations and entities that provide assistance to victims of torture and their family members in all regions of the world. However, the Fund has seen a significant decrease in contributions over the past two years. I strongly encourage States to reverse this trend, despite current global financial uncertainty. By concretely supporting victims of torture, the international community will prove its unequivocal determination and commitment to fight torture and impunity. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay [official profile] supported [press release] Ban's call on Tuesday by stating that torture is illegal in any circumstance and urging states to live up to their promise to prevent and stop inhumane treatment of individuals. She also noted that torture is used even against children. In 1997, the UN General Assembly [official website] proclaimed June 26 the International Day in Support of Victims of Torture through Resolution 52/149 [text, PDF].
Torture and ill-treatment of individuals remain problems throughout the international community. Last week, the new Senegalese government was urged to adopt fresh measures [JURIST report] to protect and promote human rights by addressing the impunity that undermines the judicial system and rule of law in the country. Amnesty International (AI) [advocacy website] found that the government was using torture and other similar methods to stop protesters and civilians as well as journalists and political opponents. Syria has also been subject to criticism by the UN experts [JURIST report] and human rights organizations such as Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] for its use of torture against civilians. It was reported [JURIST report] that Syria was even sexually abusing detainees regardless of gender and age. Even Canada was condemned [JURIST report] earlier this month for being complicit in rights violations against three Canadians who were held prisoner in Syria. The Canadian government dismissed [JURIST report] the criticism six days later. Exactly two years ago, Pillay pledged justice for torture victims [JURIST report], noted that democracies with a rule of law in place still maintain amnesties that prevent torturers from being brought to justice and promised that the international criminal tribunals and the International Criminal Court (ICC) [official website] will continue to prosecute those responsible for torture.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

HRW: China must provide for Myanmar refugees
Rebecca DiLeonardo on June 26, 2012 10:38 AM ET

[JURIST] Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] on Tuesday issued a report [text, PDF; press release] documenting refugee abuse and urging the government of China to provide basic food and shelter needs to thousands of refugees fleeing sectarian violence in neighboring Myanmar [BBC backgrounder; JURIST news archive]. Escalating violence between the Myanmar Army and the Kachin Independence Army (KIA) has put thousands of ethnic Kachin civilians in the country at risk. HRW noted that although China has generally accepted the Myanmar refugees into its borders, they typically live in poor conditions without access to adequate food, shelter, or health care. Additionally, HRW reported that the Chinese authorities arbitrarily turn away some refugees, and force others back into war-torn areas of Myanmar. The report also alleges that Myanmar refugees in China are subject to abuse by Chinese authorities, including random road-side drug testing, detention, and arbitrary fines, all without due process of law. The rights group noted that China is a party to the 1951 Refugee Convention [materials] and is required under international law to provide assistance to refugees. They called on China to immediately institute temporary protection measures for the refugees and provide them with adequate food and shelter.
Escalating conflict in Myanmar has led to international concerns. Earlier this month, HRW urged Bangladesh [JURIST report] to open its borders to Myanmar refugees. Also this month, HRW urged Myanmar to ensure the safety of communities [JURIST report] in the Arakan State. President Thein Sein [official website, in Burmese] issued a state of emergency in the area on Sunday, turning over police power to the Burmese Army, but HRW warned that without international overview, such intervention could make matters worse. Despite calls and demands by international communities to end the violence in Myanmar, the government has thus far failed to control the violence and protect civilians. In March, HRW reported that violence and rights abuses continue [JURIST report] in Myanmar's northern state of Kachin due to the conflict between Myanmar's armed forces and the KIA. During the same month, Tomas Ojea Quintana, the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar urged the country to ensure the protection of human rights [JURIST report]. In November, Human rights group Partners Relief and Development issued a report which alleged that the army may be committing war crimes [JURIST report] including torture and forced labor against ethnic communities in Kachin state.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Ukraine court postpones Tymoshenko appeal
Rebecca DiLeonardo on June 26, 2012 9:24 AM ET

[JURIST] A Ukrainian appeals court on Tuesday delayed the appeal hearing for former Ukrainian prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko [personal website; JURIST news archive] challenging her corruption conviction and seven-year sentence. Although Tymoshenko has previously indicated that she would discontinue all appeals in Ukrainian courts [JURIST report], she is required to exhaust all national options before appealing to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) [official website]. Tymoshenko's lawyers accused [press release, in Ukrainian] the prosecution of attempting to delay the transfer of her case to the ECHR. Her lawyers also said that they believed the hearing delays would continue [press release, in Ukrainian] "because the main goal of all these cases is to remove Yulia Tymoshenko from active participation in Ukrainian politics and deny her the opportunity to be elected to parliament in the 2012 elections." European leaders have called for Tymoshenko's release, and many politicians have chosen to boycott the Ukraine [Reuters report] as it co-hosts the Euro 2012 soccer championships this month.
Tymoshenko is currently facing additional charges of tax evasion. On Monday, a Ukrainian court postponed a hearing [JURIST report] in that trial and ordered Tymoshenko to be seen by a court-appointed doctor after she again failed to appear in court due to health concerns. Tymoshenko is reportedly suffering from a spinal condition which causes her debilitating pain. Earlier this month, the ECHR ended an investigation [JURIST report] into the health care conditions of Tymoshenko, finding that the Ukrainian government provided her with adequate care. She previously alleged that prison guards were beating her [press release, in Ukrainian], and refused to be treated [JURIST report] by prison doctors for back problems, believing they were under the direction of political rival President Viktor Yanukovych. Tymoshenko has already been sentenced to seven years [JURIST report] in prison on corruption charges. Ukrainian prosecutors have also indicated that she will face charges [JURIST report] in a 1996 contract killing.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bangladesh war crimes tribunal rejects bail plea for Jamaat-e-Islami leader
Jamie Davis on June 26, 2012 8:18 AM ET

[JURIST] The International Crimes Tribunal Bangladesh (ICTB) on Monday rejected a bail petition from Jamaat-e-Islami party (JI) [party website, in Bengali; GlobalSecurity backgrounder] leader Delwar Hossain Sayeedee [JURIST news archive]. Lawyers for Sayeedee asserted that he just had a surgery and needed to be placed on bail [Gulf Times report] in order to recover fully. The prosecutor opposed the bail petition, citing that Sayeedee has been recovering well and is already receiving necessary medical attention. Sayedee is a former member of Parliament in the National Assembly of Bangladesh [official website, in Bengali] and one of the leaders of the JI Bangladesh. He has been charged with 20 crimes [PTI report] contained in the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act of 1973 [text, PDF] including genocide, arson, rape and torture, and he went on trial [JURIST report] in November.
The ICTB has continued to arrest and indict individuals accused of war crimes in connection to the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War. On Thursday, the ICTB indicted Ali Ahsan Mohammad Mojaheed [JURIST report], secretary general of the JI, on seven counts of crimes against humanity. Earlier in the week, Bangladesh police arrested [JURIST report] Mir Kashem Ali for allegedly being an auxiliary to the Pakistani armed forces and running a torture facility at the Dalim Hotel during the war. The ICTB issued an arrest warrant earlier that day against the chairman of Diganta Media Corporation [Facebook page] and senior leader of the JI. He was the eighth high-profile leader who has been indicted for the crimes committed during the war. A week earlier, the ICTB indicted [JURIST report] former Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) leader Abdul Alim on 17 counts of crimes against humanity, Bangladesh's national news agency reported.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|