Federal jury reaches impasse in Google-Oracle dispute

[JURIST] A jury in the US District Court for the Northern District of California [official website] failed to reach a conclusion Monday in a copyright dispute between Oracle and Google [corporate websites]. Oracle has alleged that Google's use of Java in its Android OS violates Oracle's patents and copyrights, seeking up to $1 billion in damages. While the jury did find for Oracle in a partial verdict, they remained deadlocked [AP report] on the issue of whether Google's use could be considered "fair use," making it difficult for Oracle to win a large damage award. Google is moving for a mistrial. The trial will now move to a second phase in which the same jury will consider other patent claims.

The case went to trial [JURIST report] last month after settlement negotiations broke down. In addition to defending against patent claims, Google has also been under fire recently regarding its new privacy policy [JURIST news archive], which came into effect in March. EU data authorities are concerned [JURIST report] about the sharing and combination of personal data across services and its compliance with European data protection legislation.

 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.