JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE NEWSBURSTDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.


Tuesday, April 10, 2012

HRW: Thailand 'reconciliation' proposals undermine human rights
Max Slater at 12:57 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] on Tuesday criticized the government of Thailand [press release] for granting legal immunity to officials who allegedly violated human rights during an outbreak of political violence in 2010. In the press release, HRW claimed that the Thai government's "political reconciliation" proposals advance the partisan aims of various Thai political parties at the expense of ensuring justice for the victims of government-motivated violence. HRW Asia advocacy director John Sifton [official profile] emphasized the need for the Thai government to deny immunity to alleged violators of human rights:
The violent clashes that rocked Thailand two years ago continue to affect the lives of many Thais. Those harmed in the upheavals and their families are still waiting for justice because successive governments haven't kept their promises to hold the abusers accountable. ...The reconciliation proposal is about enabling powerful people on all sides to get away with grievous crimes. Everyone wins, except the victims. ...To end Thailand's cycle of impunity, the [Thai] government should act now to bring charges against perpetrators of crimes committed during the 2010 violence, whatever their political affiliation or official position. No amnesty should be given for serious human rights abuses.
Chalerm Yubamrung, the Deputy Prime Minister of Thailand, stated that the political reconciliation proposal will soon be submitted to the Thai parliament for approval.

Last year, HRW urged the Thai government to investigate crimes [JURIST report] allegedly committed by government officials during violent protests in spring 2010. HRW's report detailed the violence [press release] that resulted from the "red shirt" [BBC profile; JURIST news archive] pro-democracy movement and specifically from clashes between security forces and anti-government protesters acting under the direction of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD) [party website]. According to investigations by HRW, the high death toll and injuries were the consequences of excessive and unnecessary lethal force by the government as well as deliberate attacks, aimed at inciting more violence, by armed forces of the UDD. Earlier in 2011, the "red shirt" movement petitioned [JURIST report] the International Criminal Court (ICC) [official website] to launch a preliminary investigation into whether the government committed crimes against humanity during the Bangkok protests.




Link |  | print | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST LEGAL NEWS

 Malaysia authorities seize newspapers, detain opposition activists
12:34 PM ET, May 23

 Member of feminist rock group Pussy Riot denied parole
11:56 AM ET, May 23

 Egypt court acquits police officers accused of killing protester
11:39 AM ET, May 23

 click for more...

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

LATEST FORUM

The War on Terror and the Need for Muslim Support
DOMESTIC
Faisal Kutty
Valparaiso University Law School

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org