 |
|

Legal news from Monday, March 19, 2012 |
 |
|


Serbia military chief files libel suit against rights activist
Andrea Bottorff on March 19, 2012 11:46 AM ET

[JURIST] Serbian General Ljubisa Dikovic [official profile, in Serbian] on Monday brought a libel suit against the head of a Serbian human rights group that accused him of failing to prevent war crimes in 1998 and 1999 during the war in Kosovo [JURIST news archive]. Natasa Kandic, director of the Humanitarian Law Center (HLC) [advocacy website], accused Dikovic of war crimes in January [JURIST report], pointing to evidence uncovered during the trial of former Serbian president Milan Milutinovic by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) [official website]. HLC noted that Dikovic was in command of the 37th Motorized Brigade, in whose zone of control the ICTY found a "number of heavy and massive war crimes committed." The HLC alleged that, although Dikovic had a responsibility to prevent the war crimes, he did not act. Dikovic denies the allegations [RFE/RL report].
The ICTY is currently preparing for the trial of former Serbian general and alleged war criminal Ratko Mladic [ICTY backgrounder, PDF; JURIST news archive], which was supposed to begin this month but has been further delayed [JURIST report] until May 14. During a hearing last month, Mladic accused the ICTY of being "biased" against Serbs [JURIST report] and a "puppet" of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) [official website]. Mladic faces charges [case background] of genocide and crimes against humanity, including murder, political persecution, forcible transfer and deportations, cruel treatment, and the taking of peacekeepers as hostages committed by Bosnian Serb forces under his command during the Bosnian civil war. The ICTY had previously tried [JURIST news archive] former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic [JURIST news archive] but ended that trial after his death [JURIST report] in custody in 2006.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Switzerland judge resigns from Cambodia genocide tribunal
Andrea Bottorff on March 19, 2012 10:22 AM ET

[JURIST] A Swiss judge at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) [official website; JURIST news archive] resigned [press release] on Monday over a dispute with a Cambodian ECCC judge. International Co-Investigating Judge Laurent Kasper-Ansermet said that he faced ongoing resistance from National Co-Investigating Judge You Bunleng concerning investigations relating to ECCC Khmer Rouge [BBC backgrounder] cases 003 and 004 [materials] and that the dispute had created a "dysfunctional situation" at the court. Kasper-Ansermet, who will step down on May 4, is the second judge to resign from the UN-supported war crimes tribunal. He took over for Judge Siegfried Blunk who resigned [JURIST report] in October due to Cambodian political interference with the court. Also on Monday, former Khmer Rouge leader Kaing Guek Eav [ECCC materials], also known as "Duch," testified before the ECCC and agreed to cooperate with the court [AFP report] in the ongoing trials of three other senior leaders accused of crimes against humanity. Kaing is the only former Khmer Rouge leader to be convicted [JURIST report] by the ECCC for crimes against humanity and violation of the 1949 Geneva Conventions [materials].
Last month, the Open Society Justice Initiative [advocacy website] reported that the continuing dispute between Cambodia and the UN over the appointment of Kasper-Ansermet to the ECCC threatened the legitimacy of the court [JURIST report]. A week later, Dr. Mark Ellis, executive director of the International Bar Association (IBA) [official website], reported that the legitimacy of the ECCC had been undermined [JURIST report] and that criticism of the court's failure to meet international standards was necessary to promote international justice. In January, the UN [official website] refused to replace [JURIST report] Kasper-Ansermet, who was tasked with investigating two possible suspects believed to be involved in the deaths of around 1.7 million people, after Cambodia attempted to block him. ECCC judges have been criticized for allegedly failing to conduct impartial investigations. Cambodia has argued that the trial of former Khmer Rouge leaders is a Cambodian issue and should not be a matter of international concern.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court to rule on competence in capital cases
Jaclyn Belczyk on March 19, 2012 10:15 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] granted certiorari [order list, PDF] Monday in two capital cases. In Ryan v. Gonzales [docket; cert. petition, PDF], the court will determine whether 18 USC § 3599(a)(2) [text], which provides that an indigent capital state inmate pursuing federal habeas relief "shall be entitled to the appointment of one or more attorneys," impliedly entitles a death row inmate to stay the federal habeas proceedings he initiated if he is not competent to assist counsel. Respondent Ernest Valencia Gonzales's counsel initiated federal habeas proceedings and filed an exhaustive petition seeking relief, but several years later asserted that Gonzales was incompetent to communicate rationally and the proceedings should be indefinitely stayed pending possible restoration of competency. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit agreed [opinion, PDF], holding that "although Gonzales's exhausted claims are record-based or legal in nature, he is entitled to a stay pending a competency determination."
In a similar case, Tibbals v. Carter [docket], the court will also decide on the "right to competence" in capital habeas cases. The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit found [opinion, PDF] that the district court did not abuse its discretion in conducting a competency hearing and finding Sean Carter incompetent. However, the Sixth Circuit did find that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing Carter's petition and prospectively tolling the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act statute of limitations indefinitely.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

NATO failed to investigate strikes killing Libya civilians: AI
Sarah Posner on March 19, 2012 9:49 AM ET

[JURIST] The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) [official website] failed to investigate the Libyan civilians killed by air strikes which assisted in the downfall of Muammar Gaddafi [BBC obituary; JURIST news archive], Amnesty International (AI) [advocacy website] reported [text, PDF; press release] Monday. According to AI's report, entitled, "Libya: The forgotten victims of NATO Strikes," numerous civilians were either injured or killed in the strikes, and NATO has failed to conduct investigations or contact survivors. AI called on NATO to investigate the strikes and provide reparations for those injured and the families of victims. AI seeks a determination as to whether the deaths of Libyan civilians were a result of violations of international law and, if so, claims the perpetrators should be brought to justice. AI reported:The four Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their two Additional Protocols of 1977 are among the principal IHL [International Humanitarian Law] instruments. Many of the specific rules included in these treaties form part of customary IHL and are thus binding on all parties to any type of armed conflict, including on armed groups. Violations of many of these rules can constitute war crimes. All of the principles and rules cited in this briefing are part of customary international law and are binding on all parties to an armed conflict. According to the report, many of the civilian casualties were the result of strikes on private homes and no evidence demonstrated that these houses were used for military purposes.
Allegations of war crimes and human rights violations have been widespread during the Libya conflict [JURIST backgrounder]. Last month AI released a report [JURIST report] accusing the ruling National Transitional Council (NTC) [official website] in Libya of allowing the abuse and torture of supporters of former leader Gaddafi by unofficial militias. In January AI reported the recent deaths of several Libyan detainees who were apparently tortured while in custody [JURIST report]. The deaths came amid allegations of widespread torture and ill-treatment of detainees accused of being pro-Gaddafi loyalists and fighters during the Libyan conflict last year. In October of last year AI alleged that Libyan forces arrested nearly 2,500 people who face ongoing torture and detainment [JURIST report] without formal charges. In September the NTC vowed to investigate allegations of human rights abuses after AI published a report [JURIST report] alleging that both sides of the Libya conflict are responsible for human rights abuses and warning the NTC to act quickly to investigate these allegations.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|