Eleventh Circuit defers ruling on Alabama, Georgia immigration laws Keith Herting at 10:35 AM ET
[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit [official website] on Thursday heard arguments in a challenge to illegal immigration legislation recently passed in Alabama and Georgia, but the three-judge panel chose to defer its ruling until after the US Supreme Court [official website] rules on a pending challenge to the controversial Arizona immigration law [JURIST news archives]. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) [advocacy website; press release] and a coalition of other civil and immigrant rights organizations claim that the Alabama [HB 56, PDF] and Georgia [HB 87 text] laws "endanger public safety and invite racial profiling" and "interfere with federal law that controls immigration law enforcement." After nearly five hours of oral arguments the court opted to refrain from acting until the Supreme Court provides some direction when it rules on the Arizona immigration legislation, which largely inspired the Alabama and Georgia [JURIST reports] laws in question. Until the court issues a decision, the lower court rulings in the Alabama and Georgia [ACLU backgrounders] cases will remain in effect. Oral argument before the Supreme Court for Arizona v. United States is scheduled for April 25, with a ruling expected by the end of the summer term.
Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.