JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE ARCHIVEDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.
Listen to Paper Chase!


Legal news from Saturday, January 14, 2012




UN SG underlines commitment to Lebanon
Michael Haggerson on January 14, 2012 2:41 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon [official website] underscored his commitment to Lebanon's security and sovereignty [press release; transcript] on Friday. Ban Ki-moon stated: "This is a critical moment in the region. It is a time for meaningful change; time to stop the violence and end injustice; time to give people the opportunities they deserve to build a better life." Ban Ki-moon reiterated "that there remain no arms outside the authority of the State" and expressed concern over the military capacity of Hezbollah [JURIST news archive] in the region. In response, Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah dismissed [Reuters report] Ban's call for Hezbollah to disarm and stated that he was happy that Hezbollah's military power was a cause for concern. Ban also stated that he expected Lebanon to continue complying with the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) [official website], which is investigating the 2005 murders of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri [JURIST news archive] and 22 others.

In November, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton [official profile] urged Hezbollah not to resort to violence [text, JURIST report] in an attempt to impede the investigation of the STL. In an interview published by the Lebanese Newspaper An-Nahar [official website], Clinton reiterated US support for Lebanon and noted that the work of the STL is "legitimate and necessary." She also stressed the independence of the tribunal and that "no one knows what the Special Tribunal is going to do, who it might indict, or when it might choose to move forward." Clinton's interview followed remarks made by Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah [BBC profile], who said he would "cut off the hands" of any person attempting to arrest a Hezbollah member in connection with the murder. Nasrallah has previously called for all Lebanese to boycott the STL [JURIST report] after information surfaced suggesting that the tribunal is set to implicate members of Hezbollah as participants in the assassination of Hariri.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Federal court rules California prison officials failed to protect disabled inmates
Michael Haggerson on January 14, 2012 1:52 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Judge Claudia Wilken of the US District Court for the Northern District of California [official website] ruled on Friday that California prison officials have failed to protect disabled parolees by not providing them wheelchairs and other mobility assistance devices. She stated that prison officials have failed to comply with her ruling in a 1994 suit [San Francisco Chronicle report] that required prisons to provide assistance for disabled inmates. Prison officials argued that the mobility assistance devices could be used as weapons and that they are not responsible for disabled inmates. Wilken ruled that as it is the state's decision to revoke parole, must protect disabled parolees' legal rights when they are confined. She also held that prison officials had to provide wheelchairs and chains, could not deny inmates the right to file and grievances and could not exclude disabled inmates form drug treatment programs.

The Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] ruled in Brown v. Plata [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] to uphold an order [JURIST report] requiring California to release up to 46,000 prisoners to remedy the state's overcrowded prisons [JURIST news archive]. Counsel for the state of California argued that the "extraordinary and unprecedented order ... requiring the release of between 36,000 and 45,000 inmates ... is extraordinarily premature." Counsel for the prisoners argued that the court must allow the lower court to provide a remedy for 20 years of overcrowding that has violated inmates' constitutional rights. The California prison system was operating at nearly 200 percent capacity. The three-judge panel, whose decision was upheld by the Supreme Court, ordered California to reduce the population by 46,000 inmates to be under 137.5 percent institutional capacity within two years. California Governor Jerry Brown [official website] submitted a plan [JURIST report] to comply with the court order and relieve prison overcrowding in June. As of January, California has reduced its prison population by 11,000 prisoners [report to court, PDF] and is now operating at 167 percent capacity.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


US House postpones hearings on Internet bill SOPA
Jamie Davis on January 14, 2012 9:59 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA) [official website] announced [press release] Saturday that the US House of Representatives [official website] will postpone hearings on the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) [text, PDF], a day after the bill's main sponsor Representative Lamar Smith (R-TX) [official website] agreed to remove the highly contested [press release] Domain Name System (DNS) blocking provision of the bill. That section would have required Internet Service Providers (ISP) to block any foreign website suspected of copyright infringement. The bill is aimed at expanding the power of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and holders of copyrights to stop the spread of copyright infringement and counterfeit goods through the Internet. If the bill passes, the DOJ and copyright holders will be allowed to obtain court orders requiring advertising agencies and others who use a site's services to stop payments to the accused site. In regards to the bill, Smith said:
We will continue to look for ways to ensure that foreign websites cannot sell and distribute illegal content to U.S. consumers. Current law protects the rights of American innovators by prohibiting the illegal sale and distribution of their products by domestic websites. But there is no equivalent protection for American companies from foreign online criminals who steal and sell American goods to consumers around the world. Congress must address the widespread problem of online theft of America's technology and products from foreign thieves.
Many well-known websites have voiced their opposition to the bill. Earlier this week, popular social news site Reddit [website] announced it will shut down its site [press release] for twelve hours in protest to the bill. Reports have also suggested [CNet report] that other Internet sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Wikipedia and Google [websites] are also considering "blackouts" in order to stop the bill's momentum. The Obama administration also came out against provisions of SOPA [press release] on Saturday.

Recently, there has been a surge in government attention to copyright issues. Earlier this month, the Spanish government approved a new law [JURIST report] that creates a government agency with the authority to force Internet service providers to block certain websites that are involved in pirating copyrighted material. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled in November that ISPs cannot be required by law to monitor [JURIST report] their customers' activities as an attempt to combat illegal sharing of copyrighted material. In October, the US Supreme Court considered the issue of foreign copyrights in the case of Golan v. Holder when it considered arguments to determine the copyright status of foreign works [JURIST report] that used to be in the public domain. A judge for the US District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that a music file-sharing site could be held liable for contributory copyright infringement [JURIST report] in August.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST OP-ED

In Alabama, "Back Door" Restrictions on Abortion and Roe
DOMESTIC
LaJuana Davis
Cumberland School of Law

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

SYNDICATION

Add Paper Chase legal news to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to Paper Chase by e-mail. JURIST offers a free once-a-day digest [sample]. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.


R|mail e-mails individual Paper Chase posts through the day. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.

PUBLICATION

Join top US law schools, federal appeals courts, law firms and legal organizations by publishing Paper Chase legal news on your public website or intranet.

JURIST offers a news ticker and preformatted headline boxes updated in real time. Get the code.

Feedroll provides free Paper Chase news boxes with headlines or digests precisely tailored to your website's look and feel, with content updated every 15 minutes. Customize and get the code.

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org