Senate rejects amendment to remove detainee provision in defense spending bill

[JURIST] The US Senate [official website] voted Tuesday to reject an amendment [S AMDT 1064] to the National Defense Authorization Act for 2012 [SB 1867, PDF] that would have struck a provision authorizing the president to use "all necessary and appropriate force" to detain individuals suspected of terrorism. The amendment, authored by Senator Mark Udall and proposed by Senator Rand Paul [official websites], suggested to institute a timeline to allow further study and investigation on the issue of counterterrorism by Congress. The amendment was rejected by a 67-30 vote [roll call, text], allowing the controversial provision to remain in the act. The provision grants the military complete custody and control over terror suspects and grants authority to Attorney General Eric Holder [official website] over whether suspects should be tried in military or civilian courts. Opponents of the provision fear it could be applied to US citizens threatening their constitutional liberties. Supporters argue that the idea of an American citizen suspected of aiding al Qaeda [GlobalSecurity backgrounder; JURIST news archive] not getting due process is simply a lie. The entire bill is now under consideration by the Senate. If passed, it will be sent to the White House, which previously released a statement of administration policy [text, PDF] warning that President Barack Obama [official website] could veto the bill [JURIST report] if it "challenges or constrains the President's critical authorities to collect intelligence, incapacitate dangerous terrorists, [or] protect the Nation." The White House protested that the FBI should have unrestricted access and interrogation rights over domestically detained al Qaeda suspects, rather than the military.

The provision was approved [JURIST report] earlier this month by the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) [official website] in a unanimous vote after disagreements regarding the provision had blocked their passage for months [CNN report]. The passage by the SASC came shortly after an American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) [advocacy website] report [PDF] claiming that the US is diminishing its "core values" [JURIST report] with regard to various counterterrorism measures put in place during the 10 years since the 9/11 attacks [JURIST backgrounder]. To support this contention, the report cites to US policies regarding indefinite military detention for terrorism suspects, the use of torture on terrorism suspects and enemy combatants, racial and religious profiling and domestic surveillance and wiretapping. The report posits that certain US policies run deeper than what is known by the American people, civil liberties continue to be violated in secret and that future violations are imminent. The ACLU acknowledged that the government has sought to cease certain questionable practices, citing President Barack Obama's directive to close the Guantanamo Bay military prison [JURIST news archive], but stated that other questionable practices remain "core elements of [US] national security strategy today."

 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.