 |
|

Legal news from Sunday, July 24, 2011 |
 |
|


Canada public provides aid in arrests of two suspected war criminals
Dan Taglioli on July 24, 2011 4:38 PM ET

[JURIST] Two suspected war criminals have been arrested in Canada after the federal government announced Thursday it would seek the aid of its citizens in tracking down 30 individuals suspected of war crimes or crimes against humanity. Public Safety Minister Vic Toews and Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism Jason Kenney announced and released a list of the 30 alleged war criminals [materials] suspected to be hiding in Canada, including the men's photos, birthdates and other information. The list was posted on the website of the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) [official website], and the public responded. Just one day after the announcement, the Canadian public's tips led to the separate arrests of two men, Arshad Muhammad of Pakistan, and former Honduran soldier Cristobal Gonzalez-Ramirez. Each had evaded arrest for several years and was found in Canada as a direct result of public tips. Toews said [press release] Saturday:The help that Canadians are providing to Canada Border Services is proving to be beyond what we had expected. ... Those who have been involved in war crimes or crimes against humanity will find no haven on our shores; they will be located, and they will face the consequences. The ministers also thanked the public for their assistance and reminded them that all that members of the public should report tips to the CBSA or police, and not take action to apprehend the individuals listed on the website.
In 2000 Canada ratified its Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act [text, PDF] "respecting genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes and to implement the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court [materials], and to make consequential amendments to other Acts." The Act provides universal jurisdiction for war crimes and crimes against humanity. This allows the Canadian government to prosecute any person who committed an applicable offense 1) if at the time of the offense either the offender or the victim was a citizen of either Canada or its ally in an armed conflict, or 2) if after the the time of the offense the person is present in Canada. The first person convicted under the Act was Rwandan Hutu Desire Munyaneza [The Hague Justice Portal profile], who was convicted [JURIST report] in May 2009 of seven counts of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes committed during the Rwandan genocide [HRW backgrounder], and was sentenced to life imprisonment [JURIST report]. A second Rwandan genocide suspect, Jacques Mungwarere [The Hague Justice Portal profile], was charged [JURIST report] later that year and was indicted under the Act in May 2010 for war crimes, crimes against humanity and two counts of genocide. He has not yet stood trial, but his indictment was filed under section 577 of the Canadian Criminal Code, which can permit a case to be sent straight to trial without a preliminary inquiry.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Belgium burqa ban takes effect
Jennie Ryan on July 24, 2011 12:30 PM ET

[JURIST] Belgium implemented a law on Saturday banning women from wearing the Islamic burqa in public. The measure was initially passed by the Belgian Federal Parliament in April 2010 by a vote of 136-1. Under the new legislation, any woman who wears a burqa in public faces the possibility of a fine or up to seven days in jail [ABNA report]. Opponents of the controversial law allege that such a ban is discriminatory against Muslims and that a ban violates human rights. The Council of Europe [official website] commissioner of human rights Thomas Hammarberg [backgrounder] denounced the legislation [JURIST report] in a written comment [text] stating "In fact, the banning may run counter to European human rights standards, in particular the right to respect for one's private life and personal identity." A court challenge has been launched by two women who wear burqas charging that the measure is a violation of religious freedom.
Belgium is not the first EU country to enact legislation banning the wearing of full face veils in public. In April, France enacted [JURIST report] a law similar to that of Belgium after its Constitutional Court [official website, in French] ruled the legislation was constitutional [JURIST report]. Under the French law, violators wearing a face covering may be fined up to 150 euros and/or required to attend citizenship classes. In contrast, anyone convicted of forcing a woman to cover her face may be fined up to 30,000 euro and jailed for one year [AFP report, in French], and the penalties double if that woman is a minor. The French ban is not exclusive to the burqa, prohibiting any covering of the face in a public place [Metro report].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|