This law undermines our core American values of fairness and equality and will make the rampant racial profiling of people of color that is already going on in Georgia that much worse, threatening the rights of citizens and non-citizens alike. Authorizing police to demand papers from people on the street is a tactic commonly associated with police states, not robust democracies.

Alabama, Virginia, Oklahoma, Utah and Indiana [JURIST reports] have all enacted Arizona-style immigration laws within the past year. Nonetheless, these type of laws remain controversial. Earlier this week, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] upheld [opinion, PDF] a lower court decision to enjoin several provisions [JURIST report] of Arizona's controversial immigration law [SB 1070 materials; JURIST news archive]. The US Department of Justice (DOJ) [official website] filed suit [JURIST report] in July to permanently enjoin Arizona from enforcing the law, arguing that it is preempted by federal law and is thus a violation of the Supremacy Clause [text] of the US Constitution. In response, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer [official website] countersued [JURIST report] the federal government alleging an infringement upon state rights. In May, the ACLU filed suit [JURIST report] also seeking an injunction against Arizona's immigration law. The national debate over immigration issues has led President Barack Obama [official website] to call for comprehensive immigration reform [JURIST report].