 |
|

Legal news from Saturday, February 19, 2011 |
 |
|


Federal judge upholds detention of Yemeni Guantanamo inmate
Maureen Cosgrove on February 19, 2011 4:40 PM ET

[JURIST] A judge for the US District Court for the District of Columbia [official website] on Friday denied [opinion, PDF] a petition for writ of habeas corpus of a Yemeni man currently detained at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive]. Judge Ricardo Urbina held that the government proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Mashour Abdullah Muqbel Alsabri was a part of and provided material support to the Taliban, al Qaeda [JURIST news archive] or associated enemy forces. The court found that the petitioner traveled to Afghanistan to fight with the Taliban or al Qaeda, stayed at Taliban or al Qaeda guesthouses, received military training at an al Qaeda facility, traveled to the battle lines and was captured during armed conflict. Furthermore, the court found no evidence that the petitioner dissociated with these enemy forces at any point prior to his capture. These findings taken together, the court said, support the government's contention that the petitioner was lawfully detained. The petitioner was arrested in 2002 and filed his habeas corpus petition in October 2006.
Federal courts have struggled with habeas corpus rights for Guantanamo detainees. In September, Kuwaiti Guantanamo detainee Fawzi Khalid Abdullah Fahad al Odah [JURIST news archive] petitioned [text, PDF; JURIST report] the US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] to reverse a federal appeals court decision that denied him habeas corpus relief. The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit [official website] denied [text, PDF; JURIST report] habeas corpus relief to al Odah in July. The court affirmed the district court's ruling [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] that there was sufficient evidence against al Odah for him to be considered "part of" al Qaeda and Taliban forces. In August, the US District Court for the District of Columbia released a partially redacted opinion [text, PDF] ordering the release [JURIST report] of Yemeni Guantanamo Bay detainee Adnan Farhan Abdul Latif [NYT profile] for lack of evidence.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Kenya parliament speaker rules presidential nominations unconstitutional
Dwyer Arce on February 19, 2011 12:25 PM ET

[JURIST] Kenneth Marende, Speaker of the Kenyan National Assembly [official website], ruled [text] Thursday that four nominations made by President Mwai Kibaki [official profile] had violated the requirement of consultation with the prime minister under the new constitution [text, PDF; JURIST news archive]. In the ruling, Marende found that Kibaki's nominees to the positions of chief justice, attorney general, director of public prosecutions and controller of budget had violated Article 29(2) of the constitution, which states: "when this Constitution requires an appointment to be made by the President with the approval of the National Assembly, until after the first elections under this Constitution, the President shall, subject to the National Accord and Reconciliation Act, appoint a person after consultation with the Prime Minister and with the approval of the National Assembly." Prime Minister Raila Odinga [official website] has disputed the nominations [VOA report], which were made while he was in Ethiopia. Odinga had asked Kibaki to wait for his return to Kenya before making the nominations. After finding that he could rule on the issue, Marende held:I find and rule that the constitutional requirements of ... consultation subject to the National Accord and Reconciliation Act are not met if the National Assembly receives a list of nominees to constitutional offices, on which there is open and express disagreement between His Excellency, the President and the Prime Minister. Such is not the nomination contemplated by the National Accord and Reconciliation Act, which is part of the Constitution. It is unconstitutional and the unconstitutionality cannot be cured by any act of this House or of its Committees nor by a vote on a Motion in the House. Further, and I so find, no Motion on such a nomination, whatever its terms and whatever the contents of the Report upon which the Motion is based, is admissible and I therefore hereby so order. Following the ruling, Kibaki argued that Marende's ruling violated the separation of powers [KBC report], and that the issue should have been left for the courts to decide. Kibaki also insisted that his nominations were made pursuant to the constitution.
Last week, the High Court of Nairobi [official website] ruled that the nominations were unconstitutional because they violated promises of gender equality [JURIST report]. Justice Daniel Musinga found that Kibaki's appointments violated Article 27(3) of the constitution, which states, "[w]omen and men have the right to equal treatment, including the right to equal opportunities in political, economic, cultural and social spheres." Kenya ratified its new constitution [JURIST report] in August, as part of a reform movement aimed at curbing vast presidential powers. Kenya's new constitution includes numerous checks on presidential authority, among which are the creation of a supreme court and senate. The new constitution was approved by popular referendum [JURIST report], which took place amid concerns that high turnout and heated debate over the referendum could cause a repeat of the violence following the 2007 presidential election [JURIST news archive] that resulted in Kenya's current power sharing agreement between Kibaki and Odinga. The government is now expected to start implementing the new constitution, which could take as long as five years.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US military tribunal sentences Guantanamo prisoner to 14 years
Megan McKee on February 19, 2011 10:02 AM ET

[JURIST] A US military tribunal on Friday sentenced Sudanese Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] detainee Noor Uthman Mohammed [DOD materials] to 14 years in prison following a plea agreement [JURIST report] in which he admitted to helping al Qaeda and providing material support to terrorism. Mohammed admitted earlier this week to meetings with al Qaeda and acting as a weapons instructor and manager at the Khaden military camp in Afghanistan, where hijackers and other members of al Qaeda trained prior to the 9/11 attacks. Mohammed was charged [JURIST report] in May 2008 and has been detained at Guantanamo since his capture in Pakistan in 2002. As part of his plea agreement, Mohammed promised to cooperate with US investigators [AFP report] in ongoing investigations. If he does so, he will likely be released in advance of the 14 years to which he was sentenced.
Earlier this month, the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) [advocacy website] used the death of a Guantanamo detainee to highlight what it claims are problems [JURIST report] with the detention system currently used by the US for dealing with suspected terrorists. The detainee, Awal Gul, had been at the Guantanamo Bay detention center since October 2002, suspected of having aided the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan [DOD press release, PDF]. Gul died of an apparent heart attack after he had completed some aerobic exercises. The CCR believes that the circumstances surrounding Gul's death illustrate the inherent problem with the detention center and the policy the US follows in detaining and indefinitely holding suspected terrorists, claiming that the facility has become a purgatory, where people are held indefinitely. The issue of what to do with remaining detainees in US custody continues to be a significant issue. In January, Human Rights Watch criticized President Barack Obama [JURIST report] for failing to shut down the facility as he promised during the 2008 presidential campaign.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Jury reaches mixed verdict over Pennsylvania juvenile sentencing scandal
Megan McKee on February 19, 2011 9:38 AM ET

[JURIST] A jury in the US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania [official website] reached a split decision on Friday in the corruption trial of former Pennsylvania judge Mark Ciavarella, convicting him of 12 counts, including racketeering, money laundering and conspiracy, and acquitting him of 27 counts, including extortion. Ciavarella, a former judge in Pennsylvania's Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas [official website], was implicated in a juvenile sentencing scandal [JURIST news archive] and accused of receiving kickbacks for sentencing teenagers to two private juvenile detention facilities in which he had a financial interest. Ciavarella was charged with 39 counts of honest services fraud, racketeering, money laundering, wire fraud, bribery, extortion and tax evasion. He will remain free pending sentencing, and he is expected to serve [Scranton Times-Tribune report] between 13 to 15 years.
The trial began [JURIST report] earlier this month. In July, Judge Edwin Kosik accepted [JURIST report] a plea agreement [text, PDF] with former Pennsylvania judge Michael Conahan for his involvement in the juvenile sentencing scandal. Conahan now faces a 20-year prison sentence, a fine of up to $250,000 and disbarment. Kosik had previously rejected [JURIST report] joint plea agreements [text, PDF] from Conahan and Ciavarella, finding that plea bargaining to honest services fraud and tax evasion charges demonstrated that the men did not accept responsibility and that the disbarment and 87-month prison sentences were too lenient [JURIST op-ed]. Conahan and Ciavarella were indicted in September 2009, following a withdrawal of the guilty pleas they entered [JURIST reports] in February 2009.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|