JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE ARCHIVEDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.
Listen to Paper Chase!


Legal news from Sunday, December 19, 2010




UK High Court overturns interim immigration cap
Matt Glenn on December 19, 2010 1:45 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A UK High Court ruled Friday that a temporary immigration cap on skilled workers cannot stand because it was passed without sufficient parliamentary review. The court held that Home Secretary Theresa May [official profile] attempted to sidestep Parliament [BBC report] in enacting the temporary cap ahead of a permanent cap set to take effect next April. Judges ruled that May's attempt to circumvent parliamentary review violated the 1971 Immigration Act [text]. The government will have an opportunity to introduce the measure before Parliament in January. Immigration Minister Damian Green [official profile] said the government might appeal the ruling [Reuters report], but does not believe that this decision on the temporary cap will affect the permanent cap.

The Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) and the English Community Care Association (ECCA) [advocacy websites] filed their challenge to the cap [Independent report] in September. The temporary cap was announced in June [BBC report]. The caps affect only skilled non-EU workers, a segment of the immigrant population that some advocacy groups assert are vital to the UK economy [IPPR press release]. Officials argue that the temporary cap is necessary to avoid a flood of applications from immigrants seeking to enter the UK before the permanent cap goes into effect.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Ninth Circuit strikes down ban on military recruitment of minors
Ann Riley on December 19, 2010 10:23 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] on Friday upheld [opinion, PDF] a lower court's ruling invalidating the ban on the military recruitment of minors passed by two Northern California cities. In 2008, voters in Eureka and Arcata each passed the Youth Protection Act [text], identical ballot measures which prohibited the military recruitment of children under the age of 18. The Coalition to Stop Recruiting Kids! [advocacy website] accused [materials] recruiters of ignoring the dangers of military service while exaggerating the benefits. The cities argued that the ordinances prohibit conduct already forbidden by the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict [text], which the US ratified in 2002, and the Tenth Amendment [text]. The appeals court rejected the arguments because the ordinances impose greater restrictions on military recruitment than federal law and the regulation of federal military recruitment policies is not a power reserved to the states. The appeals court concluded that the ordinances were unconstitutional under the doctrine of intergovernmental immunity, first descrobed in McCulloch v. Maryland [opinion, text], because they expressly and directly regulate and discriminate against the federal government's recruitment policies and the conduct of federal agents.

Military recruitment policies recently became an issue in the June confirmation hearings [JURIST report] of Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan [JURIST news archive]. During her deanship at Harvard Law School [academic website], Kagan reinstated a prohibition against military recruiters because the military's "Don't Ask Don't Tell" (DADT) [10 USC § 654; JURIST news archive] policy violated the school nondiscrimination code. In 2006, the Supreme Court upheld [JURIST report] the 1996 Solomon Amendment [text, Georgetown backgrounder], which blocks federal funding for schools refusing to allow military recruitment on campus. The military's DADT policy was repealed [JURIST report] by the US Senate [official website] on Saturday. After September 11th, US military branches have increased recruiting waivers and continue to enlist a greater number of recruits with criminal records [JURIST reports].




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST OP-ED

In Alabama, "Back Door" Restrictions on Abortion and Roe
DOMESTIC
LaJuana Davis
Cumberland School of Law

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

SYNDICATION

Add Paper Chase legal news to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to Paper Chase by e-mail. JURIST offers a free once-a-day digest [sample]. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.


R|mail e-mails individual Paper Chase posts through the day. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.

PUBLICATION

Join top US law schools, federal appeals courts, law firms and legal organizations by publishing Paper Chase legal news on your public website or intranet.

JURIST offers a news ticker and preformatted headline boxes updated in real time. Get the code.

Feedroll provides free Paper Chase news boxes with headlines or digests precisely tailored to your website's look and feel, with content updated every 15 minutes. Customize and get the code.

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org