JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE ARCHIVEDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.
Listen to Paper Chase!


Legal news from Friday, November 12, 2010




China court rules against plaintiff in first HIV employment discrimination suit
Zach Zagger on November 12, 2010 3:36 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A Chinese court ruled Friday against a man who claimed he was denied a teaching job because he is HIV-positive, in China's first HIV/AIDs employment discrimination lawsuit. The man, known only by the alias Xiao Wu, said that he passed requisite academic tests and interviews [BBC report] for the job but was denied after his health examination. He brought the suit against the Education Ministry [official website] in Anqing where the court ruled that the city education officials properly assessed [CP report] his unsuitability for the position base on health standards. The man's lawyer said that he is only seeking the job he deserves, and he is already planning to appeal the ruling. There are about 740,000 Chinese people living with HIV/AIDs, and many face discrimination in education, employment and health care.

In June, the UN Development Programme (UNDP), in coordination with the UNAIDS Secretariat [official websites], launched the Global Commission on HIV and the Law [JURIST report] in order to better understand the role played by the law in facilitating universal access to AIDS prevention and treatment. The commission also plans to address some of the most challenging HIV legal issues, including the criminalization of HIV/AIDS transmission and behavioral practices such as drug use and sexual activity. China has struggled to deal with the HIV/AIDs problem. In April, the Chinese government lifted a ban on entry into the country [JURIST report] for individuals with HIV/AIDS and other communicable diseases. In 2006, China responded to the growing numbers of those afflicted with the disease and issued it first guidelines [JURIST report] on HIV/AIDS, banning discrimination against those infected by the virus and providing for free treatment.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Supreme Court refuses to block 'Don't Ask Don't Tell'
Matt Glenn on November 12, 2010 2:47 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Friday refused to vacate [order, PDF] a stay issued by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] allowing the military to continue enforcing its Don't Ask Don't Tell (DADT) [10 USC § 654; JURIST news archive] policy while the government appeals a September decision [JURIST report] finding the law unconstitutional. The order reads in its entirety:"The application to vacate the stay entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on November 1, 2010, presented to Justice Kennedy and by him referred to the Court is denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this application." The Obama administration, which wishes to repeal DADT legislatively, asked the court to maintain the stay in a brief [text, PDF; JURIST report] filed with the Supreme Court Wednesday. The filing was in response to a petition filed last week [text; JURIST report] by the Log Cabin Republicans [advocacy website] asking the court to overturn the indefinite extension [order, PDF; JURIST report] of a temporary stay [JURIST report] issued by the Ninth Circuit. The Log Cabin Republicans expressed disappointment [press release] with Friday's ruling:
With the likelihood of Congress repealing "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" fading with each passing day, judicial relief continues to be perhaps the most viable avenue for ending this unconstitutional policy. We and Log Cabin Republicans will continue to fight on to protect the constitutional rights of all Americans who want to serve in our military without regard to their sexual orientation.
The attorney said the group will ask the Ninth Circuit to expedite the government's appeal.

Since the enactment of DADT in 1993, approximately 13,000 servicemen and women have been discharged from the armed forces as a result of the policy. On Sunday, Defense Secretary Robert Gates called on the 112th Congress to repeal DADT [JURIST report]. In October, Gates issued a memorandum limiting the authority to discharge openly gay service members [JURIST report] to five senior Department of Defense officials. In September, a federal judge for the US District Court for the Western District of Washington [official website] ordered [JURIST report] a US Air Force officer to be reinstated after being previously discharged under DADT. Also in September, the US Senate [official website] rejected a cloture motion [JURIST report] on a defense appropriations bill that would have repealed the policy. In May, the US House of Representatives and the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) [official websites] voted to repeal the policy after Obama and Gates agreed to a compromise [JURIST reports] that would prevent the repeal from taking effect until the completion of a review to determine what effects the repeal would have on military effectiveness, soldier retention and family readiness.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Rwanda high court orders opposition leader to remain jailed for duration of trial
John Paul Putney on November 12, 2010 2:43 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Rwandan high court ruled Friday that opposition leader Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza [campaign website; JURIST news archive] will remain jailed for the duration of her trial on charges of forming a terrorist organization. Judge Johnstone Busingyi indicated that his decision was based on Ingabire's threat to state security [AP report]. The ruling follows an appeal of Tuesday's decision to deny bail and hold Ingabire for 30 days [AP report]. Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] has accused Rwanda of silencing dissent leading up to the presidential elections [HRW report] in August, which were marred by a series of attacks on outspoken government critics. In addition to Ingabire, Bernard Ntaganda, president of the opposition PS-Imberakuri party, was arrested in June and detained while awaiting trial. HRW has also called for an independent autopsy [HRW report] of Andre Kagwa Rwisereka, vice president of the opposition Democratic Green Party, after his body was found in July with his head severed and unusual marks on his body.

Ingabire has been subject to multiple arrests since returning to Rwanda in January after being exiled for 16 years. In October, Ingabire was arrested [JURIST report] on charges of being involved in the formation of a terrorist organization. Ingabire was implicated, authorities say, during investigations [AP report] into the activities of Joseph Ntawangundi, an aid to Ingabire, who was accused of commanding a Hutu militia group operating in neighboring Congo. In April, Ingabire was arrested [JURIST report] on accusations of denying the 1994 Rwandan genocide [HRW backgrounder; JURIST news archive]. Authorities cited Ingabire's call for the prosecution [AFP report] of those who killed Hutus during the genocide, in which over 800,000 people, mostly Tutsis, were slain, as evidence of her denial of the genocide. In May, Rwandan authorities arrested [JURIST report] US lawyer and JURIST Forum [website] contributor Peter Erlinder [professional profile; JURIST news archive] on charges of genocide denial while he was in Rwanda to prepare his defense of Ingabire. Erlinder returned to the US [JURIST report] in June after spending 21 days in a Rwandan prison.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


ACLU files suit over military discharge pay policy
Ashley Hileman on November 12, 2010 1:51 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) [advocacy website] filed a class action lawsuit [complaint, PDF; press release] Wednesday over a US military policy that cuts the separation pay of honorably discharged gay and lesbian service members in half. The ACLU filed the lawsuit on behalf of all service members involuntarily discharged in the last six years who were otherwise eligible to receive full separation pay, but instead received only half as a result of the separation pay policy. In the complaint, filed in the US Court of Federal Claims [official website], the ACLU challenged the policy, which the Department of Defense [official website] adopted in 1991, two years before Congress enacted the "Don't Ask Don't Tell Policy" (DADT) [10 USC § 654; JURIST news archive]. The plaintiffs contend the pay policy discriminates against homosexuals because, under federal law [10 USC § 1174], all service members are entitled to separation pay if they have been involuntarily discharged after completing at least six years of service. Joshua Block, staff attorney with the ACLU Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Project stated, "[b]y denying servicemen and women full separation pay, the military is needlessly compounding the discrimination perpetuated by 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell." The separation pay policy, unlike DADT, can be changed without congressional approval.

The Obama administration filed a brief [text, PDF; JURIST report] Wednesday asking the US Supreme Court [official website] not to rescind the stay preventing suspension of DADT. The filing is in response to a petition filed last week [text; JURIST report] by the Log Cabin Republicans [advocacy website] asking the court to overturn the indefinite extension [order, PDF; JURIST report] of a temporary stay [JURIST report] issued by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website]. The government asked the court not to interrupt the policy while it is being considered in lower courts. The filing noted that President Barack Obama and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates oppose the policy, but also stressed their support for the repeal of the policy through legislative measures, citing the need for deliberation, advance planning and training before transitioning from the 17-year-old policy. Since the enactment of DADT in 1993, approximately 13,000 servicemen and women have been discharged from the armed forces as a result of the policy.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Kenya rights group accuses official of interfering with ICC election investigation
Julia Zebley on November 12, 2010 1:40 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Kenya National Commission on Human Rights (KNCHR) [advocacy website] on Friday accused former Cabinet minster William Ruto of interfering with the International Criminal Court (ICC) [official website] investigation into the 2007 post-election violence [JURIST news archive], denying accusations of bribing witnesses. Two witnesses, Ken Braziz Wekesa and William Kepkemboi Rono, claimed Tuesday that they were bribed by the KNCHR [Daily Nation], a government-funded human rights group, to testify to the ICC against Ruto, the former higher education minister. Rono and Wekesa claimed they were bribed by KNCHR commissioner Hassan Omar Hassan [KNCHR profile] with money, entry into safe houses and an eventual promise to be moved out of Kenya. The KNCHR, admitting they housed the prospective witnesses [Daily Nation], requested an investigation into Ruto's influence on the witnesses to change their testimonies. The KNCHR also wants the police to arrest Wekesa and Rono and charge them with perjury. Although the two witnesses gave statements to the ICC, they were not slated to testify at the tribunal. The ICC announced a month ago that it would present two cases against the six individuals most responsible for causing the post-election violence, down from the initial 20 officials [JURIST reports] the ICC prosecutor initially accused. It has not been revealed if Ruto will be among those charged, although he was implicated in the initial report on the violence [text, PDF] compiled by the KNCHR.

In September, a businessman challenged the legality of the ICC investigation, claiming it was made illegal by Kenya's recently ratified constitution [JURIST reports]. However, Justice and Constitutional Affairs Minister Mutula Kilonzo [official website], said the government supports the investigation [JURIST report]. The ICC began conducting an investigation in March after the Kenyan parliament rejected [JURIST reports] conducting their own in February. The Kenyan presidential election of 2007 [JURIST report] left at least 1,000 people dead and 500,000 displaced in Kenya after protests erupted from allegations that President Mwai Kibaki [official profile] committed voter fraud.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


ACLU calls on AG to investigate Bush for torture
Drew Singer on November 12, 2010 1:02 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) [advocacy website] on Thursday published an open letter [text, PDF] to US Attorney General Eric Holder [official profile, JURIST news archive], urging him to investigate former president George W. Bush [JURIST news archive] for violation of the federal statute prohibiting torture [text]. In his recently published memoirs [Random House summary], Bush admitted to authorizing the use of waterboarding [JURIST news archive] on suspects Khalid Sheik Mohammed and Abu Zubaydah, which the ACLU says has historically been prosecuted as a crime in the US. The letter also argues that failure to investigate Bush would harm the US's ability to advocate for human rights in other countries. Assistant US Attorney General John Durham is currently investigating the allegations that the US practiced torture during the Bush Era, but is not investigating the former president himself. The letter said:
The ACLU acknowledges the significance of this request, but it bears emphasis that the former President's acknowledgement [sic] that he authorized torture is absolutely without parallel in American history. The admission cannot be ignored. In our system, no one is above the law or beyond its reach, not even a former president. That founding principle of our democracy would mean little if it were ignored with respect to those in whom the public most invests its trust. It would also be profoundly unfair for Mr. Durham to focus his inquiry on low-level officials charged with implementing official policy but to ignore the role of those who authorized or ordered the use of torture.
The letter comes days after Amnesty International [advocacy website] made a similar declaration [press release], saying that Bush's admissions "highlight once again the absence of accountability for the crimes under international law of torture and enforced disappearance committed by the USA."

In July, former head of the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) [official website] and federal judge Jay Bybee [official profile] denied approving a number of interrogation techniques used by the CIA [JURIST report]. Bybee was questioned by the committee in May in a closed-door hearing about controversial memos written by the OLC during the Bush administration, which asserted the legality of certain enhanced interrogation techniques [JURIST news archive]. The CIA subsequently used the enhanced interrogation techniques on prisoners at the Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] prison facility. According to Bybee, a number of the techniques, including repetitive waterboarding, extended isolation, the use of blackout goggles and daily beatings, were not authorized by the OLC memos. Bybee admitted to authorizing limited use of waterboarding when performed in a specific way, but he contended that the manner in which the CIA used the technique went beyond the recommendations made in the memos.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


DRC court begins trial over death of rights activist Chebeya
Brian Jackson on November 12, 2010 12:51 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The trial of eight men accused of killing Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) [BBC backgrounder] human rights activist Floribert Chebeya began in the capital city of Kinshasa on Friday. The eight accused men are all DRC policemen, but only five are currently before the court [Reuters report], as three are still at-large. The eight men face charges of abduction, assassination, terrorism and conspiracy. Cherbeya, a prominent rights activist and member of the activist group Voice of the Voiceless, was found dead in his own car [BBC report] in June 2. Soon after Cherbeya's death, national police chief John Numbi was suspended [JURIST report], and the eight accused men were arrested. Numbi does not face charges in Cherbeya's death, but members of Cherbeya's activist group are petitioning the DRC government to move the case to a military court [BBC report] with the rank to try him for Cherbeya's death.

The alleged assassination of a prominent rights activist by law enforcement is merely the latest in the ongoing human rights issues facing the DRC. In early October, Human Rights Watch called for the DRC government [JURIST report] to arrest general Bosco Ntaganda pursuant to an outstanding warrant for war crimes issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) [official website]. Earlier that same week French authorities arrested a leader [JURIST report] of the Democratic Force for the Liberation of Rwanda for crimes committed by that group in the DRC. Earlier in October, UN peacekeeping forces and the DRC government arrested Mai Mai Cheka [JURIST report] for allegedly leading a rebel group responsible for mass rapes in the country.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Lebanon military court convicts cleric on terrorism charges
Megan McKee on November 12, 2010 10:03 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A Lebanese military court on Friday convicted cleric Omar Bakri Mohammed of terrorism and sentenced him to life in prison. Bakri was found guilty [CP report] of belonging to an armed group that plotted to carry out terrorist acts against Lebanese soldiers and was sentenced along with 54 others who fought in clashes with the Lebanese army in 2007. Tried and convicted in absentia, Bakri was reportedly surprised when his lawyer informed him of the verdict. He claims to have never received a summons or an arrest warrant. As Bakri lives openly in Tripoli, a city in the north of Lebanon, and appears regularly on television, it is not immediately clear why he was not arrested. Bakri maintains that the charges are fabricated and has refused to turn himself in.

After living in the UK for 20 years, Bakri fled to Lebanon in 2005 after being named in an investigation by British authorities for allegedly making remarks in support of the London bombers [JURIST reports]. Bakri also reportedly praised insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan while vowing not to inform authorities of any information he learned about future terrorist attacks. In 2005, he denied talking about the bombings and said he planed to return to London. While living in Britain, Bakri headed the now-dissolved Islamist group al-Muhajiroun.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Azerbaijan court partially overturns journalist's convictions
Daniel Makosky on November 12, 2010 9:10 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Azerbaijani Supreme Court [official website, in Azeri] on Thursday partially overturned the convictions of imprisoned Azeri journalist Enyulla Fatullayev. The court vacated [RFE/RL report] Fatullayev's convictions for committing defamation and inciting terror and ethnic hatred and ruled that his sentence for tax evasion is complete. The ruling comes one month after the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) [official website] affirmed [APA report] its prior decision [judgment text; JURIST report] ordering Fatullayev's release because his convictions and eight-and-a-half-year prison sentence contravene Article 10, Freedom of Speech and Information, and Article 6, Right to a Fair Trial, of the European Convention on Human Rights [text, PDF]. Fatullayev will remain in prison, however, as the court found that the ECHR order does not apply to a separate two-and-a-half-year drug sentence that many regard as an attempt to prolong [CPJ reports] his incarceration. Elchin Sadiqov, Fatullayev's lawyer, announced his intentions to appeal for his client's immediate release.

In 2009, Fatullayev received, in absentia, one of Committee to Project Journalist's (CPJ) prestigious International Press Freedom Awards [press release; video] and AI's Award for Journalism Under Threat [BBC report]. Fatullayev, who was editor-in-chief of the Realny Azerbaijan and Gundalik Azerbaijan newspapers until his imprisonment, formerly worked with well-known Azeri journalist Elmar Huseynov [BBC backgrounder] on the Monitor magazine until Huseynov was murdered [BBC report] in 2005. CPJ reported recently that Fatuallyev's imprisonment could be related to his attempts to solve [report] his colleague's murder. Azerbaijan's incumbent president Ilham Aliyev has been accused by members of the press of heavy-handed repression of the media [JURIST report].




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


EU digital chief calls existing 'net neutrality' regulations sufficient
Daniel Makosky on November 12, 2010 8:22 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] European Commissioner for Digital Agenda Neelie Kroes [official website] on Thursday said that existing regulations to ensure net neutrality [backgrounder; JURIST news archive] are adequate for the time being [press release]. Kroes spoke following a four-month fact-finding period on net neutrality, a concept by which the open flow of information over the Internet is protected regardless of the amount of revenue generated by accessing the information. She stressed that maintaining the competitive nature of the European telecommunications market, transparency of service plans and ability to readily change between providers are all crucial to ensuring universal access to the Internet. According to Kroes, additional legislation might compromise the telecommunication industry's growth, though may be considered should current laws fail to sufficiently protect consumers. Such regulations may be implemented in the event that operators attempt to artificially spur sales by reducing services in basic packages or blocking access to particular web sites.

Net neutrality remains a controversial issue. In the US, Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC) [official website] introduced legislation [JURIST report] in July intended to block the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) [official website] from implementing its National Broadband Plan [official website; materials]. The FCC opened a new proceeding [JURIST report] a month earlier to identify the legal approach that will best support its efforts to develop universal access to "high quality" Internet broadband services after the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia [official website] ruled [JURIST report] in April that the commission lacks authority to require broadband providers to treat all Internet traffic equally. Telecommunications companies Verizon, AT&T and Comcast [corporate websites] argue that net neutrality would inhibit their ability to effectively manage Internet traffic.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST OP-ED

The War on Terror and the Need for Muslim Support
DOMESTIC
Faisal Kutty
Valparaiso University Law School

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

SYNDICATION

Add Paper Chase legal news to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to Paper Chase by e-mail. JURIST offers a free once-a-day digest [sample]. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.


R|mail e-mails individual Paper Chase posts through the day. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.

PUBLICATION

Join top US law schools, federal appeals courts, law firms and legal organizations by publishing Paper Chase legal news on your public website or intranet.

JURIST offers a news ticker and preformatted headline boxes updated in real time. Get the code.

Feedroll provides free Paper Chase news boxes with headlines or digests precisely tailored to your website's look and feel, with content updated every 15 minutes. Customize and get the code.

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org