JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE NEWSBURSTDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.


Thursday, November 18, 2010

Georgia lawmaker introduces bill banning illegal immigrants from public universities
Aman Kakar at 2:08 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A member of the Georgia House of Representatives [official website] introduced legislation on Wednesday to ban enrollment of illegal immigrants [HB 25 text; materials] in public post-secondary education institutions. The bill, introduced by Rep. Tom Rice (R) [official website], amends Title 50, Chapter 36 [text, PDF] of the Georgia code to include post-secondary education among the public benefits that require a verification of lawful presence in the US. Last month, the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia [official website], adopted a policy under which five Georgia universities were effectively barred from admitting illegal immigrants [AP report] starting fall 2011. The legislation will be considered by the state legislators in January.

The issue of illegal immigration [JURIST news archive] has been the subject of legislation and lawsuits across the country. On Tuesday, the California Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] that illegal immigrants are eligible to receive in-state tuition benefits at California's public colleges and universities. The court concluded that the California law did not violate federal immigration law because the exemption was not based on formal legal residency. Last month, a judge for the US District Court for the District of Arizona [official website] denied motions to dismiss a class action lawsuit [JURIST reports] challenging the constitutionality of the controversial Arizona immigration law [SB 1070 materials; JURIST news archive]. Under the law, it is designated a crime to be in the country illegally, and immigrants unable to verify their legal status could be arrested and jailed for six months and fined $2,500. In September, the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit [official website] ruled that two ordinances passed by the city of Hazleton, Pennsylvania, making it more difficult for illegal immigrants to live or work in the town are unconstitutional [JURIST report].




Link |  | print | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST LEGAL NEWS

 African leaders to request Kenyan leaders be tried domestically
3:03 PM ET, May 24

 Nokia files patent infringement suit against HTC
12:38 PM ET, May 24

 Tenth Circuit hears Hobby Lobby appeal of health care ruling
11:51 AM ET, May 24

 click for more...

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

LATEST FORUM

The War on Terror and the Need for Muslim Support
DOMESTIC
Faisal Kutty
Valparaiso University Law School

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org