JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE ARCHIVEDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.
Listen to Paper Chase!


Legal news from Friday, October 22, 2010




Haiti report finds officers killed 12 unarmed detainees during prison uprising: NYT
Zach Zagger on October 22, 2010 4:36 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Haitian prison officers are alleged to have killed 12 detainees "deliberately and without justification," using "inappropriate, abusive and disproportionate force" during a January 19 prison uprising, according to an independent commission, the New York Times [media website] reported [text] Thursday. The Times obtained an exclusive copy of the commission's report, which said the incident involved "grave violations of human rights." The uprising occurred just days after Haiti was hit with a devastating earthquake [JURIST news archive], which killed more than 200,000 people and left some one million homeless. The commission found that 14 others were wounded when the officers fired into a crowd of unarmed detainees, and, although the commission could only confirm 12 deaths, more are believed to have been killed. The event was originally covered up by local authorities in Les Cayes, but a Times investigation caused a commission to be formed [JURIST report] to inquire into the incident. The commission found it difficult to confirm the deaths because of contradictory reports, because many of the bodies had been already been buried and because some of the prisoners involved were transferred and died from other causes. The commission warned that lessons must be learned from the incident and it is evidence of the poor conditions of Haitian prisons and lack of adequately trained prison officers.

The commission was funded by both the Haitian government and the UN and was composed of three foreign and two Haiti experts led by Lt. Gen. Salvatore Carra of Italy and Florence Elie, Haiti's ombudsman. The January earthquake strained the Haiti prison system and allowed many prisoners to escape. In February, the acting head of the UN Stabilization Mission in Haiti [official website] urged Haitians to turn in prisoners who escaped [JURIST reports] when the earthquake destroyed prisons and jails. The aftermath of the earthquake also placed a strain on detainees arrested since the disaster, as limited space and limited access to judges burdened the country's already tenuous criminal justice system.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Russia prosecutors seek 14-year sentence in second Khodorkovsky case
Zach Zagger on October 22, 2010 4:11 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Russian prosecutors asked Friday for a 14-year prison sentence in the second case against former oil executive Mikhail Khodorkovsky [defense website; JURIST news archive], though his sentence could be reduced based on time served for a prior conviction. Khodorkovsky and his business partner Platon Lebedev [defense website] are charged with embezzling [JURIST report] USD $25 billion worth of oil produced by their company Yukos. The men pleaded not guilty [JURIST report] and have maintained that the charges are politically motivated. The court could take weeks to deliver the verdict. The prosecutors asked that the court take into account time served, but it was unclear whether they meant from the time Khodorkovsky was first detained in 2003 or from the new charges filed in 2007.

Khodorkovsky was once Russia's richest man and large political campaign contributor. He and Lebedev are currently serving eight-year prison sentences after being convicted [JURIST report] in 2005 on fraud and tax evasion charges stemming from an attempt to embezzle and strip their Yukos [JURIST news archive] oil company of valuable assets. Earlier this year, former Russian prime minister Mikhail Kasyanov [BBC profile] testified that former president Vladimir Putin [official website; JURIST news archive] ordered the arrest [JURIST report] of Khodorkovsky because he had funded the Communist Party [party website, in Russian] without first getting approval to do so from the president.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


UN rights office says Guinea security forces committed abuses in election demonstrations
Aman Kakar on October 22, 2010 3:15 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The UN Office of High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) [official website] expressed concern on Friday that security forces in Guinea "committed serious human rights violations" [press release] in subduing demonstrations that took place this week ahead of the run-off presidential election scheduled for Sunday. The OHCHR stated that security forces indiscriminately shot unarmed civilians, broke into private homes and severely beat young men who were not offering resistance. Security forces allegedly illegally detained and held a number of people in undisclosed locations without access to legal representation. The press release expressed specific concern that members of the Force Speciale de Securisation du Processus Electoral (FOSSEPEL), a special police unit that was formed to secure the electoral process, were among the security forces. The OHCHR called on political leaders to restrain their supporters in security forces and the general population and respect the right of people to assemble and protest peacefully. Guinea's new election chief, General Toumany Sangare, on Friday stated that the run-off election will not be held on Sunday [BBC Report]. Sangare cited lack of preparation as a reason for the delay, and he did not announce another date.

This is the third time the runoff election has been postponed. The first election, scheduled for July 18, was canceled due to allegations of misconduct during balloting [BBC report]. The second election, scheduled for September 19, was canceled amid violence [BBC Report] sparked by the election fraud conviction [JURIST report] of two senior election officials. The votes have divided primarily along ethnic lines, with all candidates running on a similar platform of economic expansion and the rule of law. The presidential election is seen as the first free election in Guinea since attaining independence in 1958. In May, the International Criminal Court (ICC) sent a delegation from the Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) [official websites] to Guinea to further investigate the killing [JURIST report] of more than 150 pro-democracy protesters in Conakry [BBC backgrounder] in September 2009. The protesters had rallied against Guinean military leader Moussa Dadis Camara [BBC profile], who announced in October that he intended to push elections forward three months and stand for election, breaking a promise not to run made shortly after he took power. An assassination attempt on Camara two months later eventually drove him into exile.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Canada Supreme Court broadens journalists' rights to protect sources
Julia Zebley on October 22, 2010 2:08 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Supreme Court of Canada [official website] on Friday expanded [judgment, PDF] journalists' rights to protect sources while testifying.The decision, delivered by Justice Louis LeBel, expanded a May Supreme Court ruling that denied journalists the overarching ability to guarantee anonymity [JURIST report] during testimony, instead limiting source disclosure to a case-by-case basis. Friday's decision did not apply a broad rule to protection of sources, but cautioned judges against forcing journalists to reveal source identity when not in the public interest, especially in civil proceedings:
If relevant information is available by other means and, therefore, could be obtained without requiring a journalist to break the undertaking of confidentiality, then those avenues ought to be exhausted. The necessity requirement, like the earlier threshold requirement of relevancy, acts as a further buffer against fishing expeditions and any unnecessary interference with the work of the media. Requiring a journalist to breach a confidentiality undertaking with a source should be done only as a last resort.
The Supreme Court's decision concerned a lawsuit brought against The Globe and Mail journalist Daniel LeBlanc over his reporting on a federal sponsorship scandal that allegedly damaged Le Groupe Polygone Editeurs [CBC profile]. During cross-examination, LeBlanc refused to reveal his anonymous source. The Globe and Mail's report [text] on the proceedings declared the decision, "a significant victory for The Globe and Mail and other media outlets because it creates strong protection for journalists who are asked to reveal their anonymous sources." The original suit has been remanded to the Quebec Superior Court, where the identity of LeBlanc's source will be reviewed for relevance to the proceedings before he is questioned again.

Protection for journalists [JURIST news archive] and their sources continues to be a worldwide concern. In April, Germany announced plans to enact legislation [JURIST report] meant to increase freedom of the press. In February, the Icelandic Parliament [official website, in Icelandic] began considering measures [JURIST report] aimed at increasing protections for journalists and promoting freedom of speech and transparency in government. Last December, the US Senate Judiciary Committee [official website] approved a bill [JURIST report] that would protect journalists' abilities to shield sources in federal court proceedings. Reporters Without Borders [advocacy website] ranked Iceland number one in press freedom in 2009 [2009 rankings], while ranking Germany eighteenth, Canada nineteenth, and the US twentieth. Their profile of Canada [materials] notes LeBlanc's case.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Dutch court dismisses judges for bias in politician's trial for anti-Islam statements
LaToya Sawyer on October 22, 2010 2:03 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A Dutch court panel on Friday dismissed the presiding judges in the trial of right-wing politician Geert Wilders [personal website; JURIST news archive] in response to claims of judicial bias. Earlier this month, the court rejected Widlers' claims of judicial bias that were fueled by his accusation [JURIST reports] that a judge's remarks cast him in a negative light to the jury. The panel considered these previous accusations, along with the judges' recent postponement [RNW report] of a decision on the defense request to re-call a witness, finding an indication of bias and dismissing the judges. The replacement judges will subject Wilder to a new trial because the new judges were not in attendance at the previous hearings. If convicted on the charges of making anti-Islamic statements, Wilders faces a maximum sentence of one year in jail.

Wilders is known for calling Islam "fascist," comparing the Quran to Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf and advocating prohibiting Muslims from immigrating to the Netherlands. Earlier this month, he announced [JURIST report] that the Dutch government will attempt to ban the burqa [JURIST news archive] and other full Islamic veils to secure the support of his Freedom Party in forming a coalition government. An Amsterdam trial court ruled in February held that it had jurisdiction to try Wilders for anti-Islamic statements. The court rejected [JURIST report] Wilders' claim that he should be tried by the Supreme Court as a member of parliament, finding that his alleged crime was committed outside his capacity as an MP. Wilders claimed that his right of freedom of speech was guaranteed to him as a Dutch man first, not a politician.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Indonesia admits responsibility for detainee torture video
Drew Singer on October 22, 2010 12:59 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Indonesian officials on Friday admitted to their soldiers' involvement in the torture of Papuan detainees, which garnered international outrage after a video of the torture surfaced [CNN report; WARNING: readers may find the video disturbing] this week. Security Affairs Minister Djoko Suyanto [website, in Bahasa] said that the solders "overreacted," and promised a thorough investigation [AFP report]. The admission comes four months after Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] urged the Indonesian government to release secession activists and adhere to international standards of free speech [report materials; press release]. The report, "Prosecuting Political Aspiration: Indonesia's Political Prisoners," criticized the Indonesian government for its treatment of people imprisoned for peaceful political expression related to the Papuan [Economist backgrounder] and Moluccan [GlobalSecurity backgrounder] secession movements. According to HRW, these prisoners are subjected to torture, poor prison conditions and the denial of medical services and are transferred to prisons distant from their homes [JURIST report] in order to isolate them from their families .

The Indonesian government has also faced criticism over other human rights issues. Earlier this month, the Indonesian Constitutional Court [official website, in Bahasa] overturned a law [JURIST report] that has allowed the Indonesian government to ban books it deemed controversial for nearly 50 years. The court found that giving the Attorney General the authority to ban books violated the Indonesian Constitution [text] by denying basic human rights without due process of the law. In April, the Constitutional Court voted 8-1 to uphold [JURIST report] a controversial anti-blasphemy law enacted in 1965 by the first Indonesian president. In 2008, HRW called for Indonesia to protect freedom of religion [JURIST report] and reverse a decree that provides for the prosecution of members of a controversial Islamic sect and to uphold its commitments under the ICCPR.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


France court to try 2 officers over teen deaths that sparked 2005 riots
Matt Glenn on October 22, 2010 12:39 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Two French police officers who chased three teens into a power substation, resulting in two of their deaths from electrocution, will stand trial on criminal charges, lawyers said Friday. The officers are charged with "non-assistance to a person in danger" [CP report] under Article 223-6 of the French penal code [text] for failing to alert anyone that the teens had entered the substation while running from officers. The officers, one of whom was on the scene and the other of whom was listening to radio reports from a command post, claim they were not aware that the teens had entered the substation. The teens' deaths set off riots in France [JURIST news archive] that lasted three weeks. Investigating judges decided to press forward with the charges, despite last month's recommendation from prosecutors [JURIST report] that the charges be dropped due to lack of evidence that the officers knew the teens had entered the substation. If convicted, each officer faces up five years in prison and fines that could reach nearly USD $100,000.

Officials first charged the officers for failure to assist in 2007. In 2006, an internal police investigation found that the officers had pursued the youths [JURIST report], a charge the officers originally denied, and that the officers acted with a "lack of thought" in not calling the power company to have the substation shut down immediately. Also In 2006, French Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin [JURIST news archive] promised to strengthen anti-vandalism laws [JURIST report] in France after a man was injured in violence marking the one-year anniversary of the 2005 riots. In 2006, France began to deport [JURIST report] some of the foreign rioters. In early 2006, France lifted its state of emergency [JURIST report] implemented during the riots. The riots began in late October 2005 and continued into November [JURIST report] of that year.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Pentagon limits 'Don't Ask Don't Tell' discharge authority
Ashley Hileman on October 22, 2010 11:16 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] US Defense Secretary Robert Gates [official profile] issued a memorandum on Thursday limiting the authority to discharge openly gay service members [press release] to five senior Department of Defense (DOD) officials. The memo is seen as a response to the uncertain future of the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (DADT) [10 USC § 654; JURIST news archive] policy, arising from the recent injunction [JURIST report] by the US District Court for the Central District of California [official website] and the subsequent temporary stay [JURIST report] issued Wednesday by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website]. According to the memo, the decision to expel can now result only from a consultation between one of the three relevant service secretaries, the Pentagon's legal counsel Jeh Johnson and the undersecretary for personnel Clifford Stanley [official profiles]. Previously, the decision could be made by a larger number of less senior military and civilian officials. The legal uncertainty of the policy has also led DOD officials to caution service members not to alter their conduct at this time, with Stanley issuing a warning that changing their status because of the injunction "may have adverse consequences for themselves or others depending upon the state of the law." The appeals court decision [press release] as to whether the Pentagon will be able to continue to enforce the law could come as early as next week. The Ninth Circuit Court requested that the Log Cabin Republicans (LCR) [advocacy website], the conservative gay activist organization that brought the suit [LCR backgrounder], submit their opposition to the order after which the court will decide whether to issue a stay that will last until February when it hears the case.

Since the enactment of DADT in 1993, approximately 13,000 servicemen and women have been discharged from the armed forces as a result of the policy. In September, the Senate [official website] rejected a cloture motion [JURIST report] on a defense appropriations bill that would have repealed the policy. In May, the House of Representatives [official website] and the Senate Armed Services Committee voted to repeal the policy after President Barack Obama and Gates agreed to a compromise [JURIST reports] that would prevent the repeal from taking effect until the completion of a review to determine what effects the repeal would have on military effectiveness, soldier retention and family readiness. In March, Gates announced changes to the enforcement [JURIST report] of the policy to make it more difficult to expel openly gay service members from the military. The changes including raising the level of who can initiate and conduct investigations and revisions both to what constituted credible information to initiate an investigation, as well as to what constituted a "reliable person" for initiating an investigation.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Sri Lanka government defends war crimes commission
Megan McKee on October 22, 2010 9:46 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Sri Lankan government on Thursday continued to defend the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC), a government mandated probe into alleged rights violations committed during the end of the nation's civil war [JURIST new archive], against widespread criticism. The commission is accused of lacking objectivity [IRIN report], showing favor for the ruling party, failing to protect witnesses and having a narrow mandate that prevents it from effectively investigating crimes. The LLRC has been further criticized [HRW press release] as a superficial attempt to stave off an international investigation into accusations of widespread and severe human rights abuses by government forces during the war. Earlier this year, Sri Lanka declined to allow a panel of UN experts entry to examine alleged violations of human rights and humanitarian law in the final stages of the civil war. The government has said that it plans to submit [Daily Mirror report] the LLRC's final report to the UN Secretary-General and the international community and plans to take remedial measures based on the recommendations of the report.

Last week, international human rights groups Human Rights Watch (HRW), Amnesty International (AI) and the International Crisis Group (ICG) [advocacy websites] publicly declined an invitation [joint letter; JURIST report] to testify before the LLRC. In rejecting Sri Lanka's invitation, the groups stated that they would welcome the opportunity to appear before the commission if they felt it was a genuine and credible effort to pursue accountability and reconciliation. The rights groups criticized the commission's failure "to meet basic international standards for independent and impartial inquiries" and "government failure to address impunity and continuing human rights abuses". The groups went on to state that the LLRC's mandate, composition, procedures and the nation's human rights environment make it impossible to carry out a free and independent inquiry into war crimes. AI is particularly concerned about the suitability of a number of former officials serving on the commission who have defended Sri Lanka against war crimes accusations, and the lack of witness protection provisions. In the recent past, the advocacy groups have accused [JURIST report; JURIST report] Sri Lanka of carrying out various human rights violations during the final months of the 30-year civil war.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Cuba activist awarded top EU human rights prize
Daniel Makosky on October 22, 2010 7:42 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The European Parliament [official website] on Thursday named Cuban activist Guillermo Farinas [press release] as the recipient of its 2010 Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought [official website]. Farinas has undergone multiple hunger strikes in support of political prisoners and to protest conditions in Cuba, and was the publisher of the now-defunct Cubanacan Press, which sought to raise awareness of the former's statuses. Earlier this year, Farinas staged a 135-day hunger strike that helped persuade Cuba to agree to the release of 52 political prisoners [JURIST report] in an arrangement negotiated with the Roman Catholic Church [church website] Five additional prisoners were approved for release [AFP report] upon the announcement of Farinas' nomination. A ceremony to award Farinas the prize is scheduled for December in France.

The Prize was established in 1988 to honor individuals or organizations for their efforts on behalf of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Named after Russian physicist Andrei Sakharov [EP profile], winner of the 1975 Nobel Peace Prize and referred to as the father of the Soviet hydrogen bomb, the award is given to "exceptional individuals or organizations fighting against oppression, intolerance and injustice." Past winners include the Russian human rights group Memorial [advocacy website, in Russian; JURIST report], Hu Jia, Alexander Milinkevich [JURIST reports], former UN secretary-general Kofi Annan [official profile], Nelson Mandela [Nobel Peace Prize profile] and Oswaldo Jose Paya Sardinas [official website, in Spanish], one of Cuba's most prominent dissidents.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


US lawyer to face charges of genocide denial in Rwanda
Megan McKee on October 22, 2010 7:08 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Rwandan Prosecutor General Martin Ngoga said Wednesday that US lawyer and JURIST Forum [website] contributor Peter Erlinder [professional profile; JURIST news archive] will be summoned to face charges of genocide denial in Rwanda. Erlinder, a defense lawyer at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) [official website], contends that it is incorrect to place the blame for the 1994 Rwandan genocide [HRW backgrounder; JURIST news archive] on one side. Ngoga made the announcement [CP report] from Arusha, Tanzania, home of the ICTR. Erlinder has made no comment on the statement, but he has previously said that he believes his contact with the US embassy shortly before his detention saved his life. He has also claimed to be on a reported hit list consisting of the opponents of Rwandan President Paul Kagame [official website; BBC profile].

The appeals chamber of the ICTR released a decision [text, PDF; JURIST report] earlier in October that allowed the Rwandan government to pursue charges against Erlinder. In a reversal of a previous statement [JURIST report], the ICTR decided that Erlinder was charged for actions committed outside the scope of his ICTR employment as a defense lawyer. Therefore, the Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations [text, PDF], a treaty to which Rwanda is a party that prevents legal action of any kind against UN employees working in an official capacity, does not apply, and Erlinder is not immune from the prosecution. Rwandan Justice Minister Tharcisse Karugarama praised the ICTR decision, emphasizing the country's reverence for the immunities treaty and announcing that Rwanda will continue with the prosecution. Erlinder returned to the US in June after spending 21 days in a Rwandan prison following his arrest [JURIST reports] on charges that he denied the genocide. The High Court of Rwanda [GlobaLex backgrounder] a week earlier had released Erlinder on bail due to persisting medical problems from what Rwandan officials say was a suicide attempt [JURIST reports].




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST OP-ED

Is Egypt's Stance on the Blue Nile Dam Legally Justified?
DOMESTIC
Zeray Yihdego
University of Aberdeen School of Law

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

SYNDICATION

Add Paper Chase legal news to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to Paper Chase by e-mail. JURIST offers a free once-a-day digest [sample]. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.


R|mail e-mails individual Paper Chase posts through the day. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.

PUBLICATION

Join top US law schools, federal appeals courts, law firms and legal organizations by publishing Paper Chase legal news on your public website or intranet.

JURIST offers a news ticker and preformatted headline boxes updated in real time. Get the code.

Feedroll provides free Paper Chase news boxes with headlines or digests precisely tailored to your website's look and feel, with content updated every 15 minutes. Customize and get the code.

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org