 |
|

Legal news from Wednesday, October 6, 2010 |
 |
|


Supreme Court hears arguments on military funeral protests
Jaclyn Belczyk on October 6, 2010 2:33 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [day call, PDF; merit briefs] Wednesday in the highly controversial case of Snyder v. Phelps [oral arguments transcript, PDF; JURIST report] on protests at military funerals. Reverend Fred Phelps and members of the Westboro Baptist Church [WARNING: readers may find material at this church website offensive; JURIST news archive] have been traveling around the country picketing military funerals in recent years, claiming US soldiers have been killed because America tolerates homosexuals. The suit was brought [JURIST report] by the family of Marine Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder after Phelps and members of his church picketed his funeral. A federal judge awarded the family [JURIST report] almost $11 million in damages, but the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed, holding [opinion, PDF] that Phelps' speech was protected under the First Amendment [text]. Counsel for the petitioner, Albert Snyder, opened his argument by stating:We are talking about a funeral. If context is ever going to matter, it has to matter in the context of a funeral. Mr. Snyder simply wanted to bury his son in a private, dignified manner. When the Respondent's behavior made that impossible, Mr. Snyder was entitled to turn to the tort law of the State of Maryland. Counsel for the church argued that, because Snyder had turned his son's funeral into a public event, the church's actions were protected because they were speaking on a matter of public concern.
In Connick v. Thompson [oral arguments transcript, PDF; JURIST report], the court heard arguments on whether imposing failure-to-train liability on a district attorney's office for a single Brady violation contravenes the rigorous culpability and causation standards or undermines prosecutors' absolute immunity. Prosecutors hid exculpatory evidence in violation of defendant John Thompson's rights under Brady v. Maryland [opinion text]. The US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana entered a judgment [text, PDF] in favor of Thompson, and the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied the motion for a new trial. Counsel for the petitioners argued that the district court misapplied the Supreme Court's rule, ignoring the "distinction between a single incident and pattern liability." Counsel for Thompson argued that court should not "write into section 1983 a per se rule that the only way ... a civil rights victim can ever establish the deliberate indifference of a district attorney is if he can prove a prior significant history of assistant prosecutors violating other citizens' constitutional rights."


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal judge bars key witness in trial of ex-Guantanamo detainee
Sarah Miley on October 6, 2010 1:30 PM ET

[JURIST] A federal judge on Wednesday barred key US government witness Hussein Abebe from testifying in the trial against former Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] detainee Ahmed Ghailani [GlobalSecurity profile; JURIST news archive]. Judge Lewis Kaplan of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) [official website] held that prosecutors could not use Abebe's testimony because it was the product of statements made by Ghailani to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) [official website] under duress. While being detained by the CIA, Ghailani was subjected [AFP report] to what the government refers to "enhanced interrogation," which Ghailani's lawyers have described as torture. Kaplan postponed the trial until Tuesday to allow the prosecutors time to appeal his decision.
In July, Kaplan refused to dismiss charges [JURIST report] against Ghailani ruling that his Sixth Amendment [text] right to a speedy trial was not violated. Ghailani's lawyers had sought a dismissal of charges, arguing that he was denied the right to a speedy trial [JURIST reports] while being detained for nearly five years in CIA secret prisons and later at Guantanamo Bay. Earlier that month, Kaplan ruled that Ghailani is not suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and is therefore fit to stand trial [JURIST report]. The issue of Ghailani's psychological state arose after he requested to be exempt [JURIST report] from prison strip searches because it triggers his PTSD, which he allegedly acquired while being interrogated at an overseas CIA detention camp. In May, Kaplan refused to dismiss criminal charges [JURIST report] against Ghailani, despite his lawyer's claims that he had been tortured in prison. Ghailani was the first Guantanamo detainee to be brought to the US for prosecution. Having been held at the Guantanamo facility since 2006, Ghailani was transferred [JURIST report] to the SDNY in June to face 286 separate counts, including involvement in the bombings and conspiring with Osama bin Laden and other members of al Qaeda to kill Americans worldwide. He pleaded not guilty [JURIST report] at his initial appearance.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UN forces arrest rebel leader for DRC mass rapes
Ann Riley on October 6, 2010 9:19 AM ET

[JURIST] Commander of the rebel Mai Mai Cheka [GlobalSecurity backgrounder] Lieutenant Colonel Sadoke Kokunda Mayele was arrested [UN News Centre Report] Tuesday by UN peacekeepers and Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) [BBC backgrounder; JURIST news archive] government forces for allegedly leading rebel groups in mass rapes in the DRC. The UN Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO) [official website] arrested Mayele under the mandate [materials] of the mission to support the DRC in bringing justice to humanitarian crimes. Mayele has been charged with crimes against humanity, rape and looting [press release]. UN Special Representative for Sexual Violence in Conflict Margot Wallstrom [EU profile], who is currently visiting the DRC, called for a swift, rigorous and open process of justice:This is very good news for the people of the Democratic Republic of Congo. It is a victory for justice, especially for the many women who have suffered rapes and other forms of sexual violence. The numerous criminal acts committed under 'Lt. Col' Mayele's command cannot be undone, but let his apprehension be a signal to all perpetrators of sexual violence that impunity for these types of crimes is not accepted and that justice will prevail. UN representatives allege that armed Congolese rebel groups Mai Mai Cheka, the Democratic Liberation Force of Rwanda (FDLR) [GlobalSecurity backgrounder], and rebels close to leaders previously connected to the National Congress for the Defense of the People (CNDP) [website, in French] raped between 150 and 200 women and children [NYT report] in a small cluster of villages in eastern DRC between July 30 and August 3 of this year. The attackers allegedly blocked all communication [BBC report] from the villages, preventing villagers from alerting UN peacekeepers stationed nearby.
Last week, the UN released a report on war crimes [text, PDF; JURIST report] and human rights abuses in the DRC. The report, originally expected to be released in September [JURIST report], lists 617 of the most serious violations of human rights, including violence against children, genocide and mass rape, committed between 1993 and 2003. Last month, the UN Security Council [official website] issued a statement condemning the recent mass rapes [text; JURIST report] and calling for justice for the victims. Also last month, the UN Special Representative for Sexual Violence in Conflict called for perpetrators of mass rapes, including heads of DRC militias, to face war crimes charges [JURIST report]. In August, members of the Security Council expressed "outrage" [JURIST report] over the recent mass rapes calling for justice for the victims. In December, HRW urged the UN Organization Mission in DR Congo (MUNOC) [official website] to stop funding military groups [JURIST report] in the country that are committing human rights abuses. In December 2008, AI reported that rape and sexual warfare have been employed [JURIST report] by both the DRC military and by rebel forces.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

East Timor rights situation improving despite abuses: UN report
Dwyer Arce on October 6, 2010 8:23 AM ET

[JURIST] The human rights situation in East Timor has continued to improve over the last year, despite the need for further reform, according to a report [text, PDF; press release] released Tuesday by the UN Integrated Mission In Timor-Leste (UNMIT) [official website]. The report, Facing the Future, chronicles the human rights situation in the country between July 2009 and June 2010. In it, UNMIT pointed out several areas in which the Timorese security forces and judiciary have improved in accountability and respect for human rights, despite the need to improve to fully meet international standards. UNMIT also pointed to several pieces of recently enacted legislation to emphasize the improvement in the rights situation, including that against domestic violence, providing for the protection of witnesses and creating commissions to deal with corruption and children's rights. The report also lauded the conduct of Timorese authorities during the trials of those accused of staging attacks against the president and prime minister in 2008, which "conformed to human rights standards and upheld the rights of the defendants," despite highlighting several weaknesses in the process. In describing the human rights situation in East Timor, the press release stated:Timor-Leste was doing far better than average in a number of human rights areas and that continues to be the case. For example, we recorded no cases of torture or enforced or involuntary disappearances during this reporting period. This is something that all citizens, including members of the security forces and the national human rights institution, ... can be proud of. ... The challenge remains of ensuring effective accountability for the small percentage of police officers and military personnel who continue to use excessive force against their fellow citizens. Despite these improvements, the report also found several areas that still require improvement, including the ongoing reliance on international officials in running the judiciary and the continued issue of bringing to account those responsible for gross human rights abuses while East Timor was under Indonesian control. Additionally, UNMIT cited the slow progress of cases against members of the security forces for rights abuses and the limited ability of victims to bring the perpetrators of past violations to justice.
In March, a Timorese court sentenced 24 individuals [JURIST report] for the attempted assassination of the country's president and prime minister in 2008. The individuals, former government and military officials displaced after civil unrest resulted in a change in government in 2006, had been accused of attacking President Jose Ramos-Horta and Prime Minister Xanana Gusmao [BBC profiles]. The attempted assassinations led to the declaration of a state of emergency [JURIST report] in the country, in an attempt to quell the long-standing tension between the government and former members of the military. Much of the conflict within East Timor stems from the country's attempts to gain independence from Indonesia in 1999, following a 25-year occupation. In August 2009, Horta, who won the 1996 Nobel Peace Prize for his work in attempting to resolve the Timor-Indonesian conflict, rejected a call for a criminal tribunal [JURIST report] to investigate abuses during the Timorese bid for independence, saying that such a tribunal would harm reconciliation between the two nations.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Canada military judge sentences soldier for killing injured Afghan
Dwyer Arce on October 6, 2010 7:18 AM ET

[JURIST] Canadian military officer Captain Robert Semrau was sentenced Tuesday by a Canadian military judge for the killing of an unarmed Afghan insurgent, avoiding a possible five-year prison sentence. At his sentencing, the judge decided against prison time, but demoted Semrau [Montreal Gazette report] and ordered him to be discharged from the military within 30 days. Semrau was convicted on charges of disgraceful conduct [BBC report] under the National Defence Act [text] for shooting, with the intent to kill, an unarmed Afghan male in the Helmand province of Afghanistan in October 2008. Testimony during the trial established that the insurgent had been part of an attack on Semrau's unit and was near death at the time of the shooting. The incident was described as a mercy killing by witnesses, an action that the judge described as illegal under Canadian and international law [AFP report]. Semrau has 30 days to appeal the sentence.
In January, the Canadian Forces National Investigation Service (CFNIS) [official backgrounder] charged Semrau with second-degree murder [JURIST report], of which he was acquitted in July. Semrau was stationed with the Operational Mentor and Liaison Team, which works with and trains the Afghan Army. The facts of the case raise questions concerning the timeliness of the charges. Human rights advocates have cited the delay between the alleged incident and the charges as a significant concern.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|