JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE ARCHIVEDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.
Listen to Paper Chase!


Legal news from Wednesday, October 6, 2010




Supreme Court hears arguments on military funeral protests
Jaclyn Belczyk on October 6, 2010 2:33 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [day call, PDF; merit briefs] Wednesday in the highly controversial case of Snyder v. Phelps [oral arguments transcript, PDF; JURIST report] on protests at military funerals. Reverend Fred Phelps and members of the Westboro Baptist Church [WARNING: readers may find material at this church website offensive; JURIST news archive] have been traveling around the country picketing military funerals in recent years, claiming US soldiers have been killed because America tolerates homosexuals. The suit was brought [JURIST report] by the family of Marine Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder after Phelps and members of his church picketed his funeral. A federal judge awarded the family [JURIST report] almost $11 million in damages, but the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed, holding [opinion, PDF] that Phelps' speech was protected under the First Amendment [text]. Counsel for the petitioner, Albert Snyder, opened his argument by stating:
We are talking about a funeral. If context is ever going to matter, it has to matter in the context of a funeral. Mr. Snyder simply wanted to bury his son in a private, dignified manner. When the Respondent's behavior made that impossible, Mr. Snyder was entitled to turn to the tort law of the State of Maryland.
Counsel for the church argued that, because Snyder had turned his son's funeral into a public event, the church's actions were protected because they were speaking on a matter of public concern.

In Connick v. Thompson [oral arguments transcript, PDF; JURIST report], the court heard arguments on whether imposing failure-to-train liability on a district attorney's office for a single Brady violation contravenes the rigorous culpability and causation standards or undermines prosecutors' absolute immunity. Prosecutors hid exculpatory evidence in violation of defendant John Thompson's rights under Brady v. Maryland [opinion text]. The US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana entered a judgment [text, PDF] in favor of Thompson, and the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied the motion for a new trial. Counsel for the petitioners argued that the district court misapplied the Supreme Court's rule, ignoring the "distinction between a single incident and pattern liability." Counsel for Thompson argued that court should not "write into section 1983 a per se rule that the only way ... a civil rights victim can ever establish the deliberate indifference of a district attorney is if he can prove a prior significant history of assistant prosecutors violating other citizens' constitutional rights."




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Federal judge bars key witness in trial of ex-Guantanamo detainee
Sarah Miley on October 6, 2010 1:30 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A federal judge on Wednesday barred key US government witness Hussein Abebe from testifying in the trial against former Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] detainee Ahmed Ghailani [GlobalSecurity profile; JURIST news archive]. Judge Lewis Kaplan of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) [official website] held that prosecutors could not use Abebe's testimony because it was the product of statements made by Ghailani to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) [official website] under duress. While being detained by the CIA, Ghailani was subjected [AFP report] to what the government refers to "enhanced interrogation," which Ghailani's lawyers have described as torture. Kaplan postponed the trial until Tuesday to allow the prosecutors time to appeal his decision.

In July, Kaplan refused to dismiss charges [JURIST report] against Ghailani ruling that his Sixth Amendment [text] right to a speedy trial was not violated. Ghailani's lawyers had sought a dismissal of charges, arguing that he was denied the right to a speedy trial [JURIST reports] while being detained for nearly five years in CIA secret prisons and later at Guantanamo Bay. Earlier that month, Kaplan ruled that Ghailani is not suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and is therefore fit to stand trial [JURIST report]. The issue of Ghailani's psychological state arose after he requested to be exempt [JURIST report] from prison strip searches because it triggers his PTSD, which he allegedly acquired while being interrogated at an overseas CIA detention camp. In May, Kaplan refused to dismiss criminal charges [JURIST report] against Ghailani, despite his lawyer's claims that he had been tortured in prison. Ghailani was the first Guantanamo detainee to be brought to the US for prosecution. Having been held at the Guantanamo facility since 2006, Ghailani was transferred [JURIST report] to the SDNY in June to face 286 separate counts, including involvement in the bombings and conspiring with Osama bin Laden and other members of al Qaeda to kill Americans worldwide. He pleaded not guilty [JURIST report] at his initial appearance.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Suu Kyi files challenge to Myanmar dissolution of opposition party
Sarah Miley on October 6, 2010 1:01 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi [BBC profile; JURIST news archive] filed an appeal Tuesday in Myanmar's Supreme Court challenging the dissolution of her opposition National League for Democracy (NLD) [party website] under a controversial election law [JURIST report]. Suu Kyi is asking the court to annul the part of the election law that bars political prisoners [JURIST report] from participating in elections and also to establish a parliament of lawmakers who won in the 1990 elections. Myanmar's military government formally abolished [BBC report] the NLD in May for failing to register for elections, which will take place in November. Suu Kyi originally filed suit with the court in April, but her claim was rejected [JURIST report]. The NLD is boycotting the upcoming elections on the basis of corruption.

In March, the NLD announced that it would not take part in the nation's first elections in 20 years after the Myanmar Supreme Court rejected [JURIST reports] a lawsuit brought by the NLD to repeal the election laws preventing Suu Kyi from participating. Myanmar also faced a bevy of criticism that month, with the UN Human Rights Council [official website] adopting a resolution [A/HRC/13/L.15 materials] condemning the country for rights violations and urging [JURIST report] the ruling junta to conduct fair and free elections. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon [official website] said that Myanmar's election laws do not meet international standards [JURIST report], and Human Rights Watch [advocacy website] has said [press release] "[the new law] continues the sham political process that is aimed at creating the appearance of civilian rule with a military spine."




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Ethiopia opposition leader released from prison
Andrea Bottorff on October 6, 2010 11:15 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Ethiopian government on Wednesday released former judge and political opposition leader Birtukan Mideksa [Reuters profile] from an Addis Ababa prison where she had been serving a life sentence. The Ethiopian Justice Ministry said that Mideksa, leader of Unity for Democracy and Justice [party website], asked the government for a pardon last month, a claim that she later confirmed in an interview [Bloomberg report]. Mideksa's release comes one day after the Ethiopian House of Representatives [official website] re-elected incumbent Prime Minister Meles Zenawi [BBC profile] for another five-year term in office [press release]. Critics argue that the announcement is meant to address international criticism [Al Jazeera report] of the country's spring elections, which prompted opposition parties to file suit claiming illegal use of intimidation and voter fraud [JURIST report]. Mideksa was originally jailed for protesting against the government.

Both the US and EU criticized the results following Zenawi's election in May. The US State Department (DOS) [official website] noted that Ethiopian election laws heavily favor the party in power [press briefing] and that Ethiopia must take direct, concrete steps to further democracy if its relationship with the US is to progress. An EU spokesman stated that the election process failed to meet international standards [BBC report] and that the ruling party clearly had an advantage in the election process. The 2005 Ethiopian elections were also marred by allegations of fraud, which led to violent demonstrations [JURIST reports]. The National Electoral Board (NEB) [official website] ordered new elections [JURIST report] in 20 districts after an investigation into the fraud allegations found evidence of abuse at more than 100 polling stations. Several Ethiopian opposition members were convicted and sentenced for their roles in the protests, although many asked for and eventually received pardons [JURIST reports].




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


UN forces arrest rebel leader for DRC mass rapes
Ann Riley on October 6, 2010 9:19 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Commander of the rebel Mai Mai Cheka [GlobalSecurity backgrounder] Lieutenant Colonel Sadoke Kokunda Mayele was arrested [UN News Centre Report] Tuesday by UN peacekeepers and Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) [BBC backgrounder; JURIST news archive] government forces for allegedly leading rebel groups in mass rapes in the DRC. The UN Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO) [official website] arrested Mayele under the mandate [materials] of the mission to support the DRC in bringing justice to humanitarian crimes. Mayele has been charged with crimes against humanity, rape and looting [press release]. UN Special Representative for Sexual Violence in Conflict Margot Wallstrom [EU profile], who is currently visiting the DRC, called for a swift, rigorous and open process of justice:
This is very good news for the people of the Democratic Republic of Congo. It is a victory for justice, especially for the many women who have suffered rapes and other forms of sexual violence. The numerous criminal acts committed under 'Lt. Col' Mayele's command cannot be undone, but let his apprehension be a signal to all perpetrators of sexual violence that impunity for these types of crimes is not accepted and that justice will prevail.
UN representatives allege that armed Congolese rebel groups Mai Mai Cheka, the Democratic Liberation Force of Rwanda (FDLR) [GlobalSecurity backgrounder], and rebels close to leaders previously connected to the National Congress for the Defense of the People (CNDP) [website, in French] raped between 150 and 200 women and children [NYT report] in a small cluster of villages in eastern DRC between July 30 and August 3 of this year. The attackers allegedly blocked all communication [BBC report] from the villages, preventing villagers from alerting UN peacekeepers stationed nearby.

Last week, the UN released a report on war crimes [text, PDF; JURIST report] and human rights abuses in the DRC. The report, originally expected to be released in September [JURIST report], lists 617 of the most serious violations of human rights, including violence against children, genocide and mass rape, committed between 1993 and 2003. Last month, the UN Security Council [official website] issued a statement condemning the recent mass rapes [text; JURIST report] and calling for justice for the victims. Also last month, the UN Special Representative for Sexual Violence in Conflict called for perpetrators of mass rapes, including heads of DRC militias, to face war crimes charges [JURIST report]. In August, members of the Security Council expressed "outrage" [JURIST report] over the recent mass rapes calling for justice for the victims. In December, HRW urged the UN Organization Mission in DR Congo (MUNOC) [official website] to stop funding military groups [JURIST report] in the country that are committing human rights abuses. In December 2008, AI reported that rape and sexual warfare have been employed [JURIST report] by both the DRC military and by rebel forces.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


East Timor rights situation improving despite abuses: UN report
Dwyer Arce on October 6, 2010 8:23 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The human rights situation in East Timor has continued to improve over the last year, despite the need for further reform, according to a report [text, PDF; press release] released Tuesday by the UN Integrated Mission In Timor-Leste (UNMIT) [official website]. The report, Facing the Future, chronicles the human rights situation in the country between July 2009 and June 2010. In it, UNMIT pointed out several areas in which the Timorese security forces and judiciary have improved in accountability and respect for human rights, despite the need to improve to fully meet international standards. UNMIT also pointed to several pieces of recently enacted legislation to emphasize the improvement in the rights situation, including that against domestic violence, providing for the protection of witnesses and creating commissions to deal with corruption and children's rights. The report also lauded the conduct of Timorese authorities during the trials of those accused of staging attacks against the president and prime minister in 2008, which "conformed to human rights standards and upheld the rights of the defendants," despite highlighting several weaknesses in the process. In describing the human rights situation in East Timor, the press release stated:
Timor-Leste was doing far better than average in a number of human rights areas and that continues to be the case. For example, we recorded no cases of torture or enforced or involuntary disappearances during this reporting period. This is something that all citizens, including members of the security forces and the national human rights institution, ... can be proud of. ... The challenge remains of ensuring effective accountability for the small percentage of police officers and military personnel who continue to use excessive force against their fellow citizens.
Despite these improvements, the report also found several areas that still require improvement, including the ongoing reliance on international officials in running the judiciary and the continued issue of bringing to account those responsible for gross human rights abuses while East Timor was under Indonesian control. Additionally, UNMIT cited the slow progress of cases against members of the security forces for rights abuses and the limited ability of victims to bring the perpetrators of past violations to justice.

In March, a Timorese court sentenced 24 individuals [JURIST report] for the attempted assassination of the country's president and prime minister in 2008. The individuals, former government and military officials displaced after civil unrest resulted in a change in government in 2006, had been accused of attacking President Jose Ramos-Horta and Prime Minister Xanana Gusmao [BBC profiles]. The attempted assassinations led to the declaration of a state of emergency [JURIST report] in the country, in an attempt to quell the long-standing tension between the government and former members of the military. Much of the conflict within East Timor stems from the country's attempts to gain independence from Indonesia in 1999, following a 25-year occupation. In August 2009, Horta, who won the 1996 Nobel Peace Prize for his work in attempting to resolve the Timor-Indonesian conflict, rejected a call for a criminal tribunal [JURIST report] to investigate abuses during the Timorese bid for independence, saying that such a tribunal would harm reconciliation between the two nations.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Canada military judge sentences soldier for killing injured Afghan
Dwyer Arce on October 6, 2010 7:18 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Canadian military officer Captain Robert Semrau was sentenced Tuesday by a Canadian military judge for the killing of an unarmed Afghan insurgent, avoiding a possible five-year prison sentence. At his sentencing, the judge decided against prison time, but demoted Semrau [Montreal Gazette report] and ordered him to be discharged from the military within 30 days. Semrau was convicted on charges of disgraceful conduct [BBC report] under the National Defence Act [text] for shooting, with the intent to kill, an unarmed Afghan male in the Helmand province of Afghanistan in October 2008. Testimony during the trial established that the insurgent had been part of an attack on Semrau's unit and was near death at the time of the shooting. The incident was described as a mercy killing by witnesses, an action that the judge described as illegal under Canadian and international law [AFP report]. Semrau has 30 days to appeal the sentence.

In January, the Canadian Forces National Investigation Service (CFNIS) [official backgrounder] charged Semrau with second-degree murder [JURIST report], of which he was acquitted in July. Semrau was stationed with the Operational Mentor and Liaison Team, which works with and trains the Afghan Army. The facts of the case raise questions concerning the timeliness of the charges. Human rights advocates have cited the delay between the alleged incident and the charges as a significant concern.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST OP-ED

The War on Terror and the Need for Muslim Support
DOMESTIC
Faisal Kutty
Valparaiso University Law School

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

SYNDICATION

Add Paper Chase legal news to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to Paper Chase by e-mail. JURIST offers a free once-a-day digest [sample]. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.


R|mail e-mails individual Paper Chase posts through the day. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.

PUBLICATION

Join top US law schools, federal appeals courts, law firms and legal organizations by publishing Paper Chase legal news on your public website or intranet.

JURIST offers a news ticker and preformatted headline boxes updated in real time. Get the code.

Feedroll provides free Paper Chase news boxes with headlines or digests precisely tailored to your website's look and feel, with content updated every 15 minutes. Customize and get the code.

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org