 |
|

Legal news from Sunday, August 22, 2010 |
 |
|


Bangladesh court rules against mandatory religious clothing
Erin Bock on August 22, 2010 4:50 PM ET

[JURIST] The Bangladeshi Supreme Court [official website] ruled Sunday that workplaces and schools cannot force individuals to wear religious clothing such as veils and skull caps. The court found that wearing religious clothing is an individual choice and cannot be made mandatory [AFP report], and requiring individuals to wear religious clothing is a human rights violation [AsiaNews report] in contravention of the Bangladeshi Constitution [text]. The ruling comes after an incident in Northern Bangladesh where a college principal was forcing female students to wear veils. In April, the high court ruled that educational institutions could not force female employees to wear veils. The ruling came after an incident where a government official chastised a female headmistress for not wearing a scarf or veil during a staff meeting. Bangladeshi human rights groups applauded this most recent decision, while others argued it is an attack on Islamic values.
The Bangladeshi high court's decision comes in the midst of other countries attempting to formally ban Islamic burqas [JURIST news archive] and other full face veils. Last month, the French National Assembly [official website, in French] voted 336-1 to approve a bill [JURIST report] that would make it illegal to wear burqas in public. The bill would require women who choose to wear the veil in public to show police their face and, if they refuse, they can be forced to attend citizenship classes or be charged a $185 USD fine. Spain's lower house of parliament, the Congress of Deputies [official website, in Spanish] rejected a similar proposal [JURIST report] to ban the burqa by a vote of 183-162 last month. UK Immigration Minister Damian Green [official profile] indicated last month that Britain's coalition government would not seek to support a similar ban in the UK [JURIST report]. In May, Australian state lawmakers voted 26-3 against a ban [JURIST report]. In April, the Belgian House of Representatives [official website, in French] voted 136-0 to approve a burqa ban [JURIST report]. European Parliament Vice President Silvana Koch-Mehrin [official website, in German] expressed her support for a continent-wide ban [JURIST report] in May, calling the face coverings a "mobile prison."


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Iraqi convicted of killing UK aid worker escapes prison
Daniel Makosky on August 22, 2010 3:29 PM ET

[JURIST] Iraqi Deputy Justice Minister Busho Ibrahim disclosed Sunday that Ali Lutfi Jassar al-Rawi, convicted [JURIST report] last year of the 2004 kidnapping and murder of British aid worker Margaret Hassan [Times Online obituary; JURIST news archive], escaped custody last September. An investigation confirmed earlier this month that al-Rawi fled [Reuters report] almost one year ago from Abu Ghraib [JURIST news archive], where he was serving a life sentence. The inquiry was conducted after several attempts to convene al-Rawi's retrial, secured on appeal, were rescheduled when authorities were unable to locate him. The trial, most recently set to begin Sunday, has now been postponed until September 19. The court may consider trying al-Rawi in absentia if he is not captured.
Hassan, who had Irish, British and Iraqi citizenship, was the director of the Iraq office of CARE International [advocacy website], where she worked with combating public health issues. After being kidnapped, a videotape surfaced [JURIST report] that appeared to show her being shot to death. Her body has not been found. In 2006, Mustafa Salman was charged, convicted and sentenced to life in prison for aiding and abetting [JURIST report] Hassan's kidnappers after her personal effects were found in his home.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|