JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE ARCHIVEDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.
Listen to Paper Chase!


Legal news from Friday, August 6, 2010




New York City subway plot suspect pleads not guilty
Daniel Richey on August 6, 2010 4:28 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Suspected terrorist Adis Medunjanin [JURIST news archive] pleaded not guilty Friday in the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York [official website] to charges of participating in a plot to detonate a bomb inside the New York City Subway. In January, Medunjanin pleaded not guilty [JURIST report] to charges that he received terrorist training conspired with Najibullah Zazi [JURIST news archive] last year to hatch the subway bomb plot. Medunjanin, a naturalized American citizen, was arrested [FBI release] earlier this year in connection with an ongoing investigation of Zazi, who allegedly traveled with Medunjanin [Reuters report] and one other individual to Pakistan in 2008 to receive al Qaeda [CFR backgrounder; JURIST news archive] training, according to prosecutors. He was indicted on additional charges in July.

Mendunjanin was indicted [NYT report] in January. His lawyer has accused authorities of holding and questioning his client without access to his family or legal counsel for 36 hours. Last month, the Department of Justice (DOJ) [official website] announced charges [JURIST report; press release] against five members of al Qaeda in connection with the plot, broadening the scope of the case to include high-ranking members of the terrorist organization such as Adnan El Shukrijumah, a leader of al Qaeda's external operations program, who is charged with organizing the New York plot for Zazi and his alleged conspirators. Zazi is a native of Afghanistan who was arrested [BBC report] by FBI agents in Colorado. He was originally charged with making false statements to the FBI. In September, he was indicted [indictment PDF; JURIST report] and originally pleaded not guilty [JURIST report] to charges of conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction. In February, he changed his plea to guilty to three criminal charges of conspiring to use weapons of mass destruction in the US and to commit murder in a foreign country, as well as providing material support to al Qaeda.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Florida AG responds to motion to dismiss health care lawsuit
Dwyer Arce on August 6, 2010 2:35 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum [official website] on Friday filed a response [text, PDF; press release] urging a federal court not to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the newly enacted health care reform law [HR 3590 text; JURIST news archive]. The lawsuit was filed in March and has been joined by 19 other states and the National Federation of Independent Businesses (NFIB) [JURIST reports]. It challenges the individual mandate provision of the law, which requires every American to buy health insurance. The response comes after a motion to dismiss [text, PDF] was filed by the Obama administration in June and asserts that the challenge is ripe for adjudication. Even though the individual mandate does not take effect until 2014, McCollum argues that because states would have to begin expending resources to ensure compliance with the mandate, the lawsuit should be allowed to proceed. Additionally, he argues that the states have standing to sue over the mandate because it undermines state police power reserved to them by the Tenth Amendment [Cornell LII backgrounder]. Due to the "manifestly unconstitutional" nature of the individual mandate, and its inability to be severed from the rest of the legislation, the health care reform bill in its entirety should be struck down as unconstitutional, the response states. Further, it went on to detail the reasons why the individual mandate is unconstitutional, explaining:
No enumerated power of Congress permits this assertion of top-down centralized economic power; nor can the Necessary and Proper Clause expand congressional power to support the mandate. Congress's commerce power extends to regulation of activities having a substantial relation to interstate commerce, but does not allow it to compel inactive individuals to enter a marketplace against their will. Likewise, Congress's power to tax does not authorize it to compel persons to buy specific insurance products. By exerting such sweeping authority over Americans' individual decisions, Congress has seized powers denied it under the Tenth Amendment, in violation of the Constitution's federalist structure and individual rights under the Fifth and Ninth Amendments.
The US District Court for the Northern District of Florida [official website] will hold a hearing on the motion to dismiss September 14.

The response cited Monday's decision refusing to dismiss another lawsuit [JURIST report] against the individual mandate filed by Virginia in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia [official website]. The court found that Virginia had standing to bring the case because the federal health care law directly contradicted a state law [JURIST report] purporting to prevent the enforcement of a federal mandate, which the state has an interest in defending. The court also held that the lawsuit was "ripe for adjudication" because the effects of the law will be felt in the near future. The Obama administration urged for dismissal in both cases on similar grounds, arguing that even if the states had standing, the law is a constitutional exercise of the Commerce Clause [Cornell LII backgrounder].




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Ex-Khmer Rouge leader hires new counsel ahead of appeal
Daniel Richey on August 6, 2010 2:17 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Former Khmer Rouge [BBC backgrounder] official Kaing Guek Eav [case materials; JURIST news archive], also known as "Duch," has hired Cambodian lawyer Kang Ritheary to replace his previous lawyer, according to documents [text, PDF] released by the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) [official website] Friday. Kaing fired [press release; JURIST report] his international co-counsel, Maitre Roux, in early July after sending a letter to ECCC President Nil Nonn, saying that he had "lost confidence" in the French lawyer. Ritheary joins Kar Savuth, Kaing's original co-counsel, also a Cambodian. Last month, the ECCC convicted Kaing [JURIST report] of crimes against humanity and of violating the 1949 Geneva Conventions, sentencing him to 35 years in prison. He plans to appeal [JURIST report].

Kaing unexpectedly asked to be released [JURIST report] at the close of his trial in November. His request was a complete departure from his previous conduct, as he had cooperated with the trial and repeatedly apologized to his victims and their families, mitigating conduct that earned him a reduced sentence from the 40 years prosecutors originally sought. His lawyers took different approaches in their closing remarks, with one stating that his client was not guilty and the other asking for clemency. In March 2009, Kaing accepted responsibility and apologized [JURIST report] for his conduct at the detention facility. He is the first of eight ex-Khmer Rouge officials expected to be tried before the ECCC. In April, the pre-trial chamber of the ECCC dismissed appeals by three other former Khmer Rouge officials [JURIST report] to block the extension of their provision detention. The three prisoners, Ieng Thirith, Ieng Sary and Khieu Samphan, were arrested in November 2007 and face charges of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, murder, torture and religious persecution.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Failure of European Muslims to integrate fuels terror recruitment: report
Dwyer Arce on August 6, 2010 11:57 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The US State Department [official website] warned Thursday that the alienation of European Muslim communities through various laws and policies could fuel recruitment for terror groups. The Country Reports on Terrorism 2009 [text], an annual report the State Department is required to publish under federal law [22 USC § 2656f text], is meant to provide a full accounting of terrorist activities in certain countries for the previous year. It cites the significant Muslim populations of several European countries, comprising both recent immigrants and second- or third-generation who face ongoing problems integrating into European society, as providing "fertile recruitment ground" for extremists. The report states that al Qaeda [GlobalSecurity backgrounder] remains the largest threat to the US. The organization has continued to spread through connections with other like-minded groups in Yemen and Somalia [JURIST news archives], where an absence of law and order have provided these groups with room to operate. Terrorist organizations are also gaining significant assistance from state sponsors, the largest of which is Iran [JURIST news archive], which has provided significant funding and operational support to Hamas and Hezbollah [GlobalSecurity backgrounders]. The State Department also pointed to the rise in US citizens involved in both domestic and international terrorist acts as cause for concern.

In July, the Council of Europe's European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) [official website] reported that violence and rhetoric targeting Muslims has risen [JURIST report] in Europe during 2009, following the recent economic crisis. The ERCI specifically pointed to the recent trend in some parts of Europe toward banning the wearing of the burqa [JURIST news archive], noting that the legislation is targeted towards Muslims, and called on countries to encourage religious diversity and acceptance. In order to combat the rising incidents of racism, ERCI is urging the 29 Council of Europe members that have not yet ratified Protocol 12 to the European Convention on Human Rights [materials], which prohibits racial discrimination, to do so. They are also advising countries to enforce existing laws against racism and to enact new laws in order to "fill the legal gaps that still exist."




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


CIA removed terror suspects from Guantanamo to avoid due process: AP
Daniel Richey on August 6, 2010 11:24 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) [official website] transferred several high-profile prisoners to Guantanamo Bay to await trial in 2003, only to transfer them back into the CIA's network of secret prisons [JURIST news archives] so they would not be entitled to lawyers and access to US courts, the Associated Press reported [text] Friday. Among the suspects reportedly on the September 2003 flight were prominent al Qaeda [CFR backgrounder] members Ramzi Binalshibh and Mustafa al-Hawsawi, who aided in the planning of the 9/11 attacks, and Abd al-Nashiri, who planned the 2000 USS Cole bombing [JURIST news archives]. A commercial jetliner operated by one of the CIA's several airline front companies removed al-Hawsawi from the "Salt Pit" in Kabul, Afghanistan, transferred alleged 9/11 conspirator Khalid Sheikh Mohammed [JURIST news archive] to "Britelite" in Bucharest, Romania, and picked up the others at a facility in Rabat, Morocco, before landing in Guantanamo Bay. The prisoners were transferred to await trial by a military tribunal, but US officials subsequently became concerned that the Supreme Court's impending ruling in Rasul v. Bush [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] would require the government to grant access to lawyers and US courts to foreign-born terror suspects. In March 2004, the CIA transferred the prisoners back into various overseas prisons, allowing the agency to interrogate them without legal protections for two more years until then-president George W. Bush ordered the prisoners back to Guantanamo under pressure from media scrutiny of the extraordinary rendition program [JURIST news archive].

Also Friday, Warsaw-based human rights group Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights (HFHR) [advocacy website, in Polish] released documents [text, PDF; part 2, text, PDF] from the Polish Border Guard Office [official website, in Polish] detailing arrival, departure and passenger information for several flights by CIA front companies into and out of cities in Poland. HFHR reports [press release, PDF] that it secured records for seven flights in total spanning a period from December 2002 to September 2003, when the AP says the five-stop flight to Guantanamo Bay took place:

[B]etween 5 December 2002 and 22 September 2003 seven planes which are commonly associated with CIA front companies landed at Szymany airport. Five of them came to Poland with passengers, but at the time of departure only crew was present on board. The last plane noted flew to Szymany empty, and left Poland with five people on board
That entry, dated September 22, 2003, shows a flight arriving with no passengers in Szymany, reportedly site of the CIA prison where Mohammad had been held, according to the AP. It then departed with five passengers for Romania, home of "Britelite," the prison to which the AP reports Mohammad was transferred around that time.

The US has come under fire for its use of CIA-operated secret detention facilities. In December, a Lithuanian parliamentary committee confirmed that the CIA had established two secret prisons for al Qaeda suspects, prompting a dispute that led to the resignation [JURIST reports] of the country's foreign minister. On his third day in office last year, US President Barack Obama ordered the closure [JURIST report] of all CIA secret prisons. The European Parliament voted [JURIST report] in February 2007 to approve a report that condemned member states for cooperating with the CIA in operating secret prisons. In January 2007, the UK admitted knowledge of the CIA prison network, and then-president George W. Bush publicly acknowledged [JURIST reports] in September 2006 that these types of facilities existed. In June 2006, the Council of Europe released [JURIST report] a report [text, PDF] that 14 European countries collaborated with the CIA by taking an active or passive role in a "global spider's web" of secret prisons and rendition flights. The existence of CIA prisons in Europe was first reported in November 2005.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


US Senate fails to approve minority farmer settlement
Dwyer Arce on August 6, 2010 10:33 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The US Senate [official website] on Thursday failed to authorize a settlement between the US government and minority farmers for alleged discrimination. The $4.6 billion settlement would be distributed between several hundred thousand minority farmers. Among that group are Native American farmers claiming that the US Department of the Interior (DOI) [official website] failed to pay them royalties on natural resources for the last century. The rest of the group receiving the settlement consists of African Americans who missed the filing deadline in the 1999 class action lawsuit Pigford v. Glickman [BFAA backgrounder] that resulted in more than $1 billion being paid to farmers. The settlement, approved by the House of Representatives [official website] in July, failed in the Senate after members of the Republican party objected to a unanimous consent motion [CNN report] proposed by Democratic members. Republican members cited concerns over the federal deficit in their decision. It is the seventh time that the Senate has failed to approve the settlement, which the Obama administration is under court order to resolve [AP report].

In February, the USDA and Department of Justice (DOJ) [official website] announced a $1.25 billion settlement [JURIST report] for African American farmers claiming they suffered racial discrimination in USDA loan programs. The settlement arises from the Pigford case, which was reopened to those who missed the filing deadline after the passage of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 [HR 6124 materials; JURIST report]. Under the terms of the new settlement, individual farmers may demonstrate their entitlement to relief through a non-judicial claims process. In 1997, black farmers alleged in the Pigford case that they were being denied USDA farm loans or forced to wait longer for loan approval than were non-minority farmers.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Mexico high court upholds Mexico City same-sex marriage law
Dwyer Arce on August 6, 2010 8:46 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Supreme Court of Mexico [official website, in Spanish] on Thursday ruled [judgment, PDF; in Spanish] 8-2 that a Mexico City law allowing same-sex marriage [JURIST news archive] is constitutional. The law, passed last year [JURIST report], was challenged by Mexican Attorney General Arturo Chavez [official website, in Spanish], who had argued that allowing same-sex marriages violates the guarantee of familial integrity under the Mexican Constitution [text, PDF]. It was also challenged by the state governments of Jalisco and Baja California, which argued that the same-sex marriage law had a negative impact on them. The court rejected their arguments, finding that the constitution did not specify what constituted a family. The court found that the regulation of marriage licenses was a state function. The court will rule next week on the issue of adoption [El Universal report, in Spanish] by same-sex couples, which was allowed under the Mexico City law, and whether the marriages must be recognized nationwide.

In December, Mexico City's legislative assembly [official website, in Spanish] approved the same-sex marriage law. The legislation allows for marriage, adoption, inheritance and other economic and social rights. The provisions also seeks to end discrimination based on sexual orientation. The state of Chihuahua is currently the only state in Mexico that recognizes same-sex civil unions [JURIST news archive]. Last month, Argentine President Cristina Fernandez [official website, in Spanish] signed a same-sex marriage bill into law after the bill was approved by the legislature [JURIST reports], making Argentina the first Latin American country to legalize same-sex marriage nationwide. On Wednesday, a US federal judge ruled that the California state ban on same-sex marriage violated the US Constitution [JURIST report]. Same-sex marriage is also recognized in Canada, Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal, Sweden, Norway, Iceland and South Africa [JURIST reports].




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


DOJ charges 14 with aiding Somalia-based terror organization al-Shabaab
Ann Riley on August 6, 2010 7:38 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The US Department of Justice (DOJ) [official website] on Thursday announced that 14 individuals have been charged [press release] with providing money, personnel and services to the Somalia-based Islamic terrorism organization al-Shabaab [CFR backgrounder]. Prosecutors in the Southern District of Alabama, the Southern District of California and the District of Minnesota [official websites] unsealed four separate indictments accusing the 14 individuals of terrorism violations. Also Thursday, two of the defendants, Amina Farah Ali and Hawo Mohamed Hassan—both naturalized US citizens—were arrested. Announcing the arrests and charges, Attorney General Eric Holder [official profile] stated [text]:
[T]hese arrests and charges should serve as an unmistakable warning to others considering joining or supporting terrorist groups like al-Shabaab: if you choose this route you can expect to find yourself in a U.S. jail cell or a casualty on the battlefield in Somalia. As demonstrated by the charges unsealed today, we are seeing an increasing number of individuals - including U.S. citizens - who have become captivated by extremist ideology and have taken steps to carry out terrorist objectives, either at home or abroad. It's a disturbing trend that we have been intensely investigating in recent years and will continue to investigate and root out. But we must also work to prevent this type of radicalization from ever taking hold.
The unsealed September 2009 three-count indictment [text, PDF] charges US citizen Omar Hammami with providing "material support and resources ... services and personnel, including himself" to the foreign terror association al-Shabaab in violation of 18 USC §§ 2332a(b), 2339A, and 2339B [texts]. US citizen Jehad Mostafa was separately charged for providing material support to al-Shabaab in the unsealed October 2009 indictment [text, PDF]. Currently, Hammami and Mostafa, who both could potentially face 15 years in prison for each count, are not in custody and are believed to be in Somalia. Ali and Hassan were charged in an unsealed July 2010 indictment [text, PDF] with conspiracy to provide material support to al-Shabaab between September 17, 2008 and July 19, 2010. Communicating with people in Somalia, Ali and Hassan allegedly solicited funds under false pretenses to support al-Shabaab. Prosecutors in the District of Minnesota also unsealed a July 2010 third superseding indictment [text, PDF] that charges 10 individuals, including three US citizens, with conspiracy to provide material and financial support to al-Shabaab and conspiracy to kill and injure individuals abroad. The 10 defendants, of which seven have previously charged by an indictment or criminal complaint, are not in custody and are believed to be overseas. To date, in connection with the al-Shabaab investigation, 19 defendants have been charged in Minnesota, with nine arrests and five guilty pleas.

Thursday's indictments highlight a growing concern of US citizens' involvement with extremist groups and homegrown terrorists. In June, a Pakistani anti-terrorism court sentenced five Americans [JURIST report] from the DC-area to 10 years in prison for plotting attacks on Pakistan. That same week, Pakistani-born US citizen Faisal Shahzad [BBC profile] pleaded guilty to 10 counts of terrorism and weapons charges [JURIST reports] relating to May's attempted car bombing in New York City's Times Square. In April, Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] criticized [JURIST report] the violent and repressive conditions in southern Somalia that have been implemented by al-Shabaab.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST OP-ED

In Alabama, "Back Door" Restrictions on Abortion and Roe
DOMESTIC
LaJuana Davis
Cumberland School of Law

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

SYNDICATION

Add Paper Chase legal news to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to Paper Chase by e-mail. JURIST offers a free once-a-day digest [sample]. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.


R|mail e-mails individual Paper Chase posts through the day. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.

PUBLICATION

Join top US law schools, federal appeals courts, law firms and legal organizations by publishing Paper Chase legal news on your public website or intranet.

JURIST offers a news ticker and preformatted headline boxes updated in real time. Get the code.

Feedroll provides free Paper Chase news boxes with headlines or digests precisely tailored to your website's look and feel, with content updated every 15 minutes. Customize and get the code.

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org